← Back

CLASS 6A · District 29-6A

San Antonio Marshall Rams

Enrollment: 2,519 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 5

Rank

#239

was #239

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

670

#239 of 249

OVR Grade

64.1

#239 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	San Antonio Southwest Legacy (0-0) 948	24% (-11)	—	—	—	—
2	San Antonio Southwest (0-0) 920	26% (-10)	—	—	—	—
3	@San Antonio Warren (0-0) 1057	16% (-15)	—	—	—	—
5	#35San Antonio Harlan (0-0) 1967	< 2% (-52)	—	—	—	—
6	@San Antonio Taft (0-0) 1164	11% (-20)	—	—	—	—
7	@San Antonio Sotomayor (0-0) 1431	4% (-30)	—	—	—	—
8	@San Antonio O'Connor (0-0) 1010	19% (-14)	—	—	—	—
9	San Antonio Holmes (0-0) 629	54% (+2)	—	—	—	—
10	@#38San Antonio Brennan (0-0) 1958	< 2% (-52)	—	—	—	—
11	San Antonio Stevens (0-0) 925	26% (-10)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 29-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		35	San Antonio Harlan (1) Hawks	83.6 1967	0-0	0-0	—	—	7.3-0.7	> 98%	D1
2		38	San Antonio Brennan (2) Bears	83.5 1958	0-0	0-0	—	—	7.3-0.7	> 98%	D1
3		139	San Antonio Sotomayor (3) Wildcats	75.6 1431	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.4-2.5	92.3%	D2
4		187	San Antonio Taft (4) Raiders	71.5 1164	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.1-3.9	54%	D2
5		201	San Antonio Warren (6) Warriors	69.9 1057	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.5-4.5	26%	—
6		207	San Antonio O’Connor (7) Panthers	69.2 1010	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.2-4.8	17.2%	—
7		217	San Antonio Stevens (8) Falcons	67.9 925	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.7-5.3	9.4%	—
8		239	San Antonio Marshall (5) Rams	64.1 670	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.3-6.7	< 2%	—
9		242	San Antonio Holmes (9) Huskies	63.5 629	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.1-6.9	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how San Antonio Marshall’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2006

8-4

Rating 569 (68th)

#2 · 2005

6-4

Rating 544 (60th)

#3 · 2021

8-3

Rating 530 (55th)

#4 · 2020

4-4

Rating 510 (48th)

#5 · 2004

5-5

Rating 507 (47th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	1-9	629	11.0	47.0	−36.0	1309	−21.1	+21.6	−42.7	431	−6.91	+0.00	−6.91	302(3rd)
2024	4-6	1027	20.6	30.2	−9.6	1273	−12.3	+7.3	−19.6	1010	−4.67	+0.11	−4.79	416(18th)
2023	2-8	904	19.5	34.5	−15.0	1291	−12.3	+12.2	−24.5	887	−6.54	+0.09	−6.63	391(13th)
2022	2-8	1006	15.8	31.8	−16.0	1393	−14.0	+7.0	−21.0	976	−6.23	+0.02	−6.26	406(16th)
2021	8-3	1567	35.6	27.8	+7.8	1358	+4.3	+2.0	+2.3	1558	−0.51	+1.06	−1.57	530(55th)
2020	4-4	1352	36.1	27.2	+8.9	1355	+7.1	+3.6	+3.5	1587	−2.85	+0.23	−3.08	510(48th)
2019	2-8	1002	15.5	30.1	−14.6	1476	−8.9	+6.1	−15.0	1124	−5.16	+0.06	−5.22	422(20th)
2018	2-8	1035	20.3	32.6	−12.3	1516	−5.7	+6.9	−12.6	1184	−4.71	+0.46	−5.18	434(23rd)
2017	3-7	890	15.3	26.4	−11.1	1232	−16.7	+3.8	−20.5	988	−5.22	+0.07	−5.29	395(14th)
2016	2-8	776	17.7	40.4	−22.7	1260	−13.0	+18.8	−31.8	704	−6.06	+0.10	−6.15	347(7th)
2015	0-10	677	13.4	48.0	−34.6	1451	−16.5	+18.6	−35.1	622	−7.51	0.00	−7.51	327(5th)
2014	3-7	943	15.2	27.8	−12.6	1495	−9.1	+2.6	−11.8	1206	−4.17	+0.08	−4.25	429(22nd)
2013	1-9	956	19.3	34.7	−15.4	1368	−11.6	+9.6	−21.1	972	−6.78	+0.02	−6.79	400(15th)
2012	5-6	1208	21.2	34.7	−13.5	1507	−6.4	+5.9	−12.3	1192	−3.01	+0.33	−3.35	452(29th)
2011	1-9	859	11.8	31.6	−19.8	1412	−14.6	+8.4	−23.0	925	−6.61	+0.01	−6.62	387(12th)
2010	3-7	1112	10.1	25.0	−14.9	1400	−18.4	−0.1	−18.3	1042	−5.13	+0.26	−5.39	426(21st)
2009	1-9	917	12.5	28.9	−16.4	1433	−12.9	+5.6	−18.4	1039	−6.84	+0.30	−7.14	408(16th)
2008	2-8	993	16.1	36.0	−19.9	1444	−10.3	+11.6	−21.9	952	−6.07	+0.26	−6.33	404(16th)
2007	4-6	1257	17.3	21.9	−4.6	1367	−8.6	+1.8	−10.3	1242	−3.78	+0.65	−4.43	468(33rd)
2006	8-4	1688	29.3	19.9	+9.4	1449	+3.3	−4.8	+8.1	1704	−1.55	+1.31	−2.86	569(68th)
2005	6-4	1459	23.9	16.9	+7.0	1416	−1.0	−6.1	+5.0	1626	−2.35	+0.76	−3.11	544(60th)
2004	5-5	1374	24.4	23.3	+1.1	1393	−2.3	+0.5	−2.8	1429	−3.68	+0.30	−3.97	507(47th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.