← Back
CLASS 6A · District 14-6A

Spring Westfield Mustangs

Enrollment: 2,145 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 8
Rank
#45
was #45
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1914
#45 of 249
OVR Grade
82.9
#45 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
Houston Heights (0-0) 1521
84% (+16)
2
@Richmond Randle
17% (-15)
3
#20Willis (0-0) 2169
26% (-10)
5 94% (+27)
6
@Spring (0-0) 955
> 98% (+38)
7
Aldine Nimitz (0-0) 1474
86% (+18)
8
@Aldine Davis (0-0) 1416
89% (+20)
9
@Aldine (0-0) 253
> 98% (+66)
10
Spring Dekaney (0-0) 1361
91% (+22)
11 > 98% (+48)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 14-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 45
Mustangs
82.9
1914
0-0 0-0 6.6-0.4 > 98% D2
2 126
Cougars
76.2
1474
0-0 0-0 4.9-2.1 89.7% D1
3 142
Falcons
75.3
1416
0-0 0-0 4.6-2.4 84% D1
4 154
Wildcats
74.5
1361
0-0 0-0 4.3-2.7 75% D2
5 175
Eagles
72.8
1248
0-0 0-0 3.7-3.3 44.8%
6 211
Lions
68.4
955
0-0 0-0 2.3-4.7 6%
7 236
Generals
64.9
724
0-0 0-0 1.4-5.6 < 2%
8 249
Mustangs
57.8
253
0-0 0-0 0.2-6.8 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Spring Westfield’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2005
11-1
Rating 751 (97th)
#2 · 2017
11-1
Rating 744 (97th)
#3 · 2006
13-1
Rating 741 (97th)
#4 · 2021
12-1
Rating 739 (97th)
#5 · 2022
12-2
Rating 739 (97th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 6-5 1702 25.5 16.8 +8.6 1511 −2.6 −10.1 +7.4 1686 −1.64 +0.42 −2.06 572(69th)
2024 8-3 2037 30.5 14.6 +15.9 1505 +4.6 −12.0 +16.6 1915 +0.58 +1.58 −1.00 638(86th)
2023 11-3 2336 45.4 23.9 +21.5 1573 +17.6 −7.5 +25.0 2126 +2.18 +2.50 −0.33 703(94th)
2022 12-2 2371 49.4 16.4 +32.9 1636 +23.3 −13.6 +36.9 2422 +3.53 +3.57 −0.04 739(97th)
2021 12-1 2420 46.4 11.8 +34.6 1586 +18.5 −18.1 +36.6 2416 +3.50 +3.56 −0.06 739(97th)
2020 8-2 2303 35.0 15.5 +19.5 1572 +8.8 −13.9 +22.8 2070 +1.25 +1.79 −0.54 680(91st)
2019 13-2 2385 36.7 11.5 +25.2 1659 +11.3 −19.7 +31.0 2276 +3.91 +4.01 −0.10 737(97th)
2018 12-2 2388 30.5 12.5 +18.0 1664 +5.2 −19.3 +24.5 2112 +3.79 +3.89 −0.10 708(95th)
2017 11-1 2408 37.7 8.4 +29.2 1619 +14.4 −18.8 +33.2 2331 +3.79 +3.98 −0.19 744(97th)
2016 10-4 2326 36.1 13.2 +22.9 1666 +13.2 −15.2 +28.4 2211 +2.16 +2.70 −0.54 716(95th)
2015 10-2 2398 36.1 18.5 +17.6 1928 +17.4 −17.8 +35.2 2380 +4.38 +4.55 −0.16 737(97th)
2014 13-2 2422 36.1 22.1 +13.9 1929 +15.9 −15.2 +31.2 2279 +5.50 +5.72 −0.23 737(97th)
2013 13-1 2474 38.9 18.1 +20.9 1789 +15.9 −15.7 +31.7 2292 +4.83 +4.84 −0.01 737(97th)
2012 12-1 2330 40.3 18.2 +22.1 1697 +13.3 −16.5 +29.8 2245 +4.00 +4.06 −0.07 707(95th)
2011 10-4 2048 31.5 25.9 +5.6 1835 +10.8 −7.4 +18.3 1957 +3.37 +5.68 −2.32 660(89th)
2010 6-4 1732 23.6 23.7 −0.1 1756 +2.5 −7.6 +10.1 1753 −0.12 +1.57 −1.69 581(72nd)
2009 8-4 1764 35.1 26.0 +9.1 1746 +11.8 −5.7 +17.6 1939 +0.12 +2.62 −2.50 617(82nd)
2008 5-4 1906 26.8 21.1 +5.7 1635 +4.8 −6.1 +10.9 1772 −0.66 +1.26 −1.92 595(76th)
2007 10-3 2268 33.2 15.8 +17.3 1720 +13.1 −13.2 +26.2 2156 +2.32 +3.63 −1.31 695(94th)
2006 13-1 2370 33.6 9.9 +23.8 1735 +12.3 −19.6 +32.0 2299 +4.65 +4.74 −0.09 741(97th)
2005 11-1 2340 39.2 10.9 +28.3 1685 +19.7 −16.1 +35.9 2397 +3.72 +4.07 −0.35 751(97th)
2004 13-2 2246 35.6 17.0 +18.6 1702 +15.5 −12.5 +28.0 2201 +3.41 +4.08 −0.66 715(95th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.