← Back

CLASS 6A · District 16-6A

Cy Falls Golden Eagles

Enrollment: 2,958 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 7

Rank

#36

was #36

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1963

#36 of 249

OVR Grade

83.6

#36 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@Strake Jesuit (0-0) 1623	81% (+14)	—	—	—	—
2	New Caney	> 98% (+39)	—	—	—	—
3	@Fort Bend Travis (0-0) 1526	86% (+17)	—	—	—	—
5	Cy-Fair (0-0) 1710	74% (+10)	—	—	—	—
6	@Cy Creek (0-0) 1081	98% (+35)	—	—	—	—
7	Cy Lakes (0-0) 1481	88% (+19)	—	—	—	—
8	@Jersey Village (0-0) 827	> 98% (+45)	—	—	—	—
9	Langham Creek (0-0) 1612	81% (+14)	—	—	—	—
10	@Cy Ridge (0-0) 730	> 98% (+49)	—	—	—	—
11	Cy Woods (0-0) 1458	89% (+20)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 16-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		36	Cy Falls (7) Golden Eagles	83.6 1963	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.3-0.7	> 98%	D2
2		73	Cy-Fair (3) Bobcats	79.8 1710	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.2-1.8	93.3%	D1
3		89	Langham Creek (6) Lobos	78.3 1612	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.7-2.3	85.2%	D2
4		119	Cy Lakes (4) Spartans	76.3 1481	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-3	64.7%	D1
5		129	Cy Woods (1) Wildcats	76 1458	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.9-3.1	52.9%	—
6		198	Cy Creek (5) Cougars	70.3 1081	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.1-4.9	4.1%	—
7		225	Jersey Village (2) Falcons	66.4 827	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-6	< 2%	—
8		235	Cy Ridge (8) Rams	65 730	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.7-6.3	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Cy Falls’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2006

12-4

Rating 672 (91st)

#2 · 2011

10-2

Rating 643 (86th)

#3 · 2019

10-2

Rating 637 (85th)

#4 · 2007

9-3

Rating 634 (85th)

#5 · 2025

9-4

Rating 626 (84th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	9-4	1918	44.2	24.1	+20.2	1428	+13.6	−2.6	+16.3	1907	−0.64	+1.51	−2.15	626(84th)
2024	9-3	1859	36.2	17.6	+18.7	1339	+5.9	−6.8	+12.7	1816	−0.16	+1.23	−1.39	613(81st)
2023	8-3	1702	31.0	21.5	+9.5	1406	−0.4	−6.2	+5.8	1644	−0.31	+1.45	−1.76	565(67th)
2022	8-4	1649	29.8	24.2	+5.6	1438	−0.4	−3.9	+3.5	1587	−0.99	+1.37	−2.37	556(64th)
2021	4-6	1466	20.4	25.6	−5.2	1559	−5.9	−4.4	−1.5	1462	−2.83	+0.31	−3.14	508(47th)
2020	2-7	1383	22.9	39.0	−16.1	1662	−3.5	+4.7	−8.2	1295	−3.84	+0.05	−3.89	474(34th)
2019	10-2	1967	38.9	14.2	+24.7	1406	+10.3	−9.1	+19.4	1984	+1.59	+1.96	−0.37	637(85th)
2018	9-3	1601	29.6	13.6	+16.0	1402	+0.2	−11.2	+11.4	1785	−0.44	+1.73	−2.17	578(71st)
2017	5-5	1562	23.2	25.6	−2.4	1677	−0.3	−5.7	+5.4	1634	−1.39	+0.65	−2.04	542(59th)
2016	2-8	1330	16.7	28.7	−12.0	1646	−13.1	−8.0	−5.1	1373	−4.80	+0.26	−5.07	486(39th)
2015	10-3	1840	38.8	27.3	+11.5	1570	+9.0	−4.8	+13.8	1844	+1.37	+2.31	−0.94	605(79th)
2014	4-6	1331	32.4	33.2	−0.8	1569	+5.7	+2.8	+2.9	1571	−2.54	+0.92	−3.46	512(49th)
2013	2-8	1271	17.7	36.8	−19.1	1556	−7.4	+8.3	−15.6	1109	−5.26	+0.11	−5.37	447(27th)
2012	8-3	1833	41.5	24.1	+17.5	1484	+11.8	−4.3	+16.1	1901	−0.23	+1.54	−1.77	604(79th)
2011	10-2	1999	38.2	18.5	+19.7	1517	+10.0	−11.5	+21.5	2037	+2.03	+2.78	−0.75	643(86th)
2010	7-3	1608	37.1	21.2	+15.9	1405	+6.6	−5.6	+12.1	1803	−1.00	+0.98	−1.99	573(70th)
2009	5-6	1646	31.3	41.0	−9.7	1713	+8.7	+8.5	+0.2	1505	−1.34	+1.56	−2.90	536(57th)
2008	3-6	1435	28.3	42.0	−13.7	1545	+2.3	+12.7	−10.4	1241	−3.35	+0.29	−3.64	482(37th)
2007	9-3	1942	44.6	31.2	+13.3	1628	+20.4	+2.8	+17.5	1938	+1.00	+2.84	−1.84	634(85th)
2006	12-4	2133	31.0	23.3	+7.7	1742	+11.4	−7.4	+18.8	1970	+2.70	+4.52	−1.82	672(91st)
2005	9-5	1850	25.2	22.4	+2.8	1603	+4.5	−3.6	+8.1	1703	−0.56	+2.10	−2.65	601(78th)
2004	8-5	1727	27.1	20.1	+7.0	1510	+3.2	−3.2	+6.4	1659	−1.99	+1.52	−3.51	580(72nd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.