← Back

CLASS 6A · District 14-6A

Aldine Nimitz Cougars

Enrollment: 3,228 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 3

Rank

#126

was #126

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1474

#126 of 249

OVR Grade

76.2

#126 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@Barbers Hill (0-0) 1822	19% (-14)	—	—	—	—
2	Jersey Village (0-0) 827	94% (+26)	—	—	—	—
3	@#31Cy Ranch (0-0) 2039	9% (-23)	—	—	—	—
5	@Aldine (0-0) 253	> 98% (+49)	—	—	—	—
6	Spring Dekaney (0-0) 1361	62% (+5)	—	—	—	—
7	@#45Spring Westfield (0-0) 1914	14% (-18)	—	—	—	—
8	Aldine Eisenhower (0-0) 1248	72% (+9)	—	—	—	—
9	@Spring (0-0) 955	90% (+21)	—	—	—	—
10	@Aldine MacArthur (0-0) 724	96% (+30)	—	—	—	—
11	Aldine Davis (0-0) 1416	56% (+2)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 14-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		45	Spring Westfield (8) Mustangs	82.9 1914	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.6-0.4	> 98%	D2
2		126	Aldine Nimitz (3) Cougars	76.2 1474	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.9-2.1	89.7%	D1
3		142	Aldine Davis (2) Falcons	75.3 1416	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.6-2.4	84%	D1
4		154	Spring Dekaney (7) Wildcats	74.5 1361	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.3-2.7	75%	D2
5		175	Aldine Eisenhower (5) Eagles	72.8 1248	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.7-3.3	44.8%	—
6		211	Spring (6) Lions	68.4 955	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.3-4.7	6%	—
7		236	Aldine MacArthur (1) Generals	64.9 724	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.4-5.6	< 2%	—
8		249	Aldine (4) Mustangs	57.8 253	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.2-6.8	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Aldine Nimitz’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2012

7-4

Rating 551 (62nd)

#2 · 2024

7-4

Rating 545 (60th)

#3 · 2023

8-3

Rating 539 (59th)

#4 · 2025

8-3

Rating 532 (56th)

#5 · 2004

6-5

Rating 524 (54th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	8-3	1581	35.2	18.6	+16.5	1130	+1.4	+1.2	+0.2	1504	−1.49	+0.55	−2.04	532(56th)
2024	7-4	1540	38.3	23.3	+15.0	1262	+8.0	+2.5	+5.4	1635	−1.83	+0.38	−2.22	545(60th)
2023	8-3	1491	34.8	20.9	+13.9	1235	+1.6	−2.2	+3.8	1595	−0.52	+0.38	−0.91	539(59th)
2022	6-5	1354	33.5	28.5	+4.9	1318	+0.7	+5.1	−4.5	1388	−2.25	+0.67	−2.93	491(41st)
2021	4-7	1254	15.8	29.6	−13.8	1453	−15.1	+1.9	−17.0	1076	−3.47	+0.14	−3.61	437(24th)
2020	3-4	1150	22.9	29.9	−7.0	1400	−5.4	+6.1	−11.5	1213	−2.18	+0.09	−2.27	—
2019	3-7	948	16.4	31.4	−15.0	1362	−12.7	+6.4	−19.1	1023	−5.18	+0.15	−5.33	404(16th)
2018	4-6	1244	33.8	38.9	−5.1	1290	+1.7	+14.3	−12.5	1186	−4.04	+0.62	−4.67	453(29th)
2017	4-5	1225	20.8	24.9	−4.1	1392	−5.8	+1.1	−6.9	1327	−2.44	+0.81	−3.25	470(33rd)
2016	3-7	1007	11.1	27.1	−16.0	1364	−17.4	+2.9	−20.3	993	−4.51	+0.12	−4.64	406(16th)
2015	2-9	984	16.7	43.2	−26.5	1406	−12.5	+18.3	−30.8	731	−6.50	+0.04	−6.53	369(9th)
2014	2-8	866	19.7	32.3	−12.6	1377	−10.3	+9.6	−19.9	1003	−6.22	+0.08	−6.30	395(14th)
2013	4-7	1294	27.3	39.1	−11.8	1387	−1.0	+15.6	−16.6	1086	−5.34	+0.78	−6.12	446(26th)
2012	7-4	1565	31.7	18.5	+13.3	1355	+2.5	−4.6	+7.1	1679	−2.47	+0.51	−2.98	551(62nd)
2011	4-7	1498	18.1	26.5	−8.4	1531	−6.2	+1.7	−7.9	1302	−4.41	+0.65	−5.06	496(43rd)
2010	3-7	1155	14.1	26.5	−12.4	1415	−14.8	+0.2	−15.0	1124	−5.41	+0.20	−5.60	442(25th)
2009	4-6	1295	21.6	28.5	−6.9	1405	−3.1	+5.3	−8.5	1288	−4.11	+0.73	−4.84	475(35th)
2008	3-6	1238	21.4	24.1	−2.7	1480	−4.1	+0.3	−4.4	1389	−4.24	+0.32	−4.55	484(38th)
2007	6-4	1271	22.6	20.3	+2.3	1390	−4.5	−2.5	−2.1	1448	−2.51	+0.60	−3.11	497(43rd)
2006	6-4	1377	25.1	21.2	+3.9	1355	−3.0	−0.8	−2.2	1444	−2.42	+0.68	−3.10	506(47th)
2005	7-4	1490	21.6	17.5	+4.2	1351	−4.2	−2.8	−1.4	1465	−1.72	+1.33	−3.05	524(53rd)
2004	6-5	1479	23.1	20.3	+2.8	1414	−1.8	−1.5	−0.3	1492	−2.76	+0.91	−3.67	524(54th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.