← Back
CLASS 6A · District 7-6A

Richardson Eagles

Enrollment: 2,659 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6
Rank
#179
was #175
Record
1-5
0-3 district
Elo
1192
#179 of 249
OVR Grade
72
#179 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
71.4
#161 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
64.9
#211 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1075
#190 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
@Wylie East (4-2) 1720
 38% (-5) L 20-31 1602 −4.9 −8.9 — −0.67
2
Garland Naaman Forest
 76% (+11) W 24-23 1244 −9.6 +0.6 +0.07 —
3
Mansfield Timberview
 41% (-4) L 7-60 384 −16.8 +27.8 — −0.74
4
Plano West (2-4) 1342
 47% (-1) L 20-52 621 −5.2 +30.0 — −0.86
5
Plano (2-4) 1451
 41% (-4) L 19-38 942 −8.5 +13.8 — −0.88
7
@Plano East (4-2) 1678
 13% (-18) L 35-39 1654 +14.2 +8.0 — −0.68
8
Richardson Berkner (2-4) 1624
 14% (-17) — — — — — —
9
@Richardson Pearce (0-6) 1004
 69% (+8) — — — — — —
10
#21Coppell (5-1) 2214
 < 2% (-41) — — — — — —
11
@Richardson Lake Highlands (4-2) 1695
 11% (-20) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 7-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 21
Cowboys
87.4
2214
 5-1 3-0 42.5 13.0 6.8-0.2 > 98% D1
2 86
Wildcats
79.6
1695
 4-2 3-0 30.5 26.5 5.5-1.5 > 98% D2
3 88
Panthers
79.3
1678
 4-2 2-1 32.2 18.7 4.3-2.7 87.2% D1
4 97
Rams
78.5
1624
 2-4 1-2 27.0 27.0 3.9-3.1 76.1% D2
5 133
Wildcats
75.9
1451
 2-4 2-1 22.2 28.5 3.5-3.5 33.9% —
6 157
Wolves
74.2
1342
 2-4 1-2 20.5 24.5 2.4-4.6 3.4% —
7 206
Mustangs
69.1
1004
 0-6 0-3 12.0 38.0 0.6-6.4 < 2% —
8 179
Eagles
72
1192
 1-5 0-3 20.8 40.5 1-6 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Richardson’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2025
8-4
Rating 569 (68th)
#2 · 2010
7-4
Rating 521 (52nd)
#3 · 2009
6-5
Rating 516 (50th)
#4 · 2024
7-5
Rating 490 (40th)
#5 · 2004
5-5
Rating 488 (39th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 8-4 1565 31.8 16.2 +15.7 1272 −0.9 −7.4 +6.4 1661 −1.91 +0.81 −2.73 569(68th)
2024 7-5 1348 28.8 25.8 +2.9 1277 −4.1 +2.2 −6.3 1342 −2.69 +0.67 −3.36 490(40th)
2023 4-6 1008 29.5 24.6 +4.9 1190 −5.5 +2.1 −7.6 1310 −4.42 +0.03 −4.45 457(30th)
2022 3-7 893 19.8 29.4 −9.6 1283 −13.5 +5.6 −19.1 1022 −4.77 +0.03 −4.80 402(15th)
2021 1-9 681 14.0 38.9 −24.9 1249 −20.8 +14.2 −35.0 626 −7.58 +0.02 −7.59 326(5th)
2020 5-6 1168 17.6 28.4 −10.7 1304 −15.0 +3.5 −18.5 1037 −3.68 +0.16 −3.83 420(19th)
2019 5-5 1140 26.6 24.4 +2.2 1234 −5.7 +2.6 −8.3 1293 −3.20 +0.10 −3.30 457(30th)
2018 5-5 1024 30.2 38.3 −8.1 1197 −5.0 +14.1 −19.1 1023 −3.35 +0.08 −3.44 411(17th)
2017 1-9 687 20.2 42.7 −22.5 1395 −11.7 +13.7 −25.4 864 −7.06 +0.01 −7.08 360(8th)
2016 0-10 692 6.6 31.2 −24.6 1407 −25.7 +4.1 −29.8 755 −7.87 0.00 −7.87 346(7th)
2015 1-9 944 23.4 43.9 −20.5 1468 −7.9 +13.5 −21.4 965 −6.84 +0.12 −6.96 396(14th)
2014 3-7 1207 20.3 38.2 −17.9 1449 −9.7 +10.0 −19.7 1006 −4.79 +0.24 −5.03 426(21st)
2013 3-7 1138 28.3 34.5 −6.2 1508 −1.8 +5.1 −6.9 1327 −3.71 +0.39 −4.11 464(31st)
2012 4-7 1362 29.1 44.9 −15.8 1701 +1.7 +10.8 −9.1 1273 −2.84 +0.26 −3.10 477(36th)
2011 5-5 1341 27.9 34.0 −6.1 1350 −2.6 +9.1 −11.7 1207 −2.90 +0.36 −3.25 469(33rd)
2010 7-4 1501 23.5 18.5 +5.0 1388 −6.0 −5.0 −1.0 1476 −1.11 +0.60 −1.71 521(52nd)
2009 6-5 1329 26.5 17.6 +8.9 1334 −3.1 −5.0 +1.9 1548 −2.52 +0.45 −2.97 516(50th)
2008 5-5 1167 22.6 20.7 +1.9 1308 −8.0 −2.0 −6.0 1350 −2.94 +0.47 −3.41 473(34th)
2007 0-10 766 8.3 41.9 −33.6 1739 −14.5 +9.8 −24.3 893 −5.80 0.00 −5.80 379(11th)
2006 0-10 893 8.0 44.4 −36.4 1679 −14.2 +13.7 −27.9 803 −6.70 0.00 −6.70 377(11th)
2005 2-8 1082 22.0 25.6 −3.6 1376 −7.9 +1.6 −9.4 1264 −6.25 +0.11 −6.36 456(29th)
2004 5-5 1297 22.4 24.0 −1.6 1385 −5.6 +0.8 −6.4 1340 −3.10 +0.60 −3.70 488(39th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.