← Back

CLASS 6A · District 20-6A

Alief Hastings Bears

Enrollment: 3,567 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 2

Rank

#209

was #209

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

975

#209 of 249

OVR Grade

68.7

#209 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@Cy Park (0-0) 764	71% (+8)	—	—	—	—
2	@Lamar Consolidated	20% (-13)	—	—	—	—
3	Houston Stratford (0-0) 1414	14% (-18)	—	—	—	—
4	@#47Houston Memorial (0-0) 1907	< 2% (-37)	—	—	—	—
5	Houston Westside (0-0) 758	71% (+9)	—	—	—	—
6	@Alief Taylor (0-0) 1287	21% (-12)	—	—	—	—
7	Houston Lamar (0-0) 1805	3% (-33)	—	—	—	—
8	@Houston Heights (0-0) 1521	9% (-22)	—	—	—	—
9	Alief Elsik (0-0) 1019	45% (-2)	—	—	—	—
10	@Houston Bellaire (0-0) 757	71% (+9)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 20-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		47	Houston Memorial (6) Mustangs	82.8 1907	0-0	0-0	—	—	7.2-0.8	> 98%	D1
2		62	Houston Lamar (4) Texans	81.2 1805	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.8-1.2	> 98%	D1
3		108	Houston Heights (8) Bulldogs	76.9 1521	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.4-2.6	85.7%	D2
4		143	Houston Stratford (9) Spartans	75.3 1414	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.9-3.1	71.7%	D2
5		169	Alief Taylor (5) Lions	73.4 1287	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.2-3.8	35.8%	—
6		204	Alief Elsik (1) Rams	69.3 1019	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.6-5.4	4.7%	—
7		209	Alief Hastings (2) Bears	68.7 975	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.4-5.6	3.1%	—
8		232	Houston Bellaire (3) Cardinals	65.4 757	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.2-6.8	< 2%	—
9		231	Houston Westside (7) Wolves	65.4 758	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.2-6.8	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Alief Hastings’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2018

7-5

Rating 599 (77th)

#2 · 2017

6-3

Rating 558 (65th)

#3 · 2007

6-4

Rating 535 (57th)

#4 · 2005

5-5

Rating 513 (49th)

#5 · 2009

5-5

Rating 509 (48th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	1-9	851	11.1	28.0	−16.9	1290	−21.7	+5.0	−26.7	834	−7.37	+0.04	−7.41	376(11th)
2024	3-7	1086	17.9	28.7	−10.8	1357	−13.2	+3.9	−17.2	1071	−5.17	+0.18	−5.36	430(22nd)
2023	2-8	990	17.7	34.7	−17.0	1410	−10.4	+9.1	−19.5	1012	−5.54	+0.03	−5.57	416(19th)
2022	1-9	881	11.6	45.8	−34.2	1533	−15.5	+16.5	−32.0	700	−5.77	+0.01	−5.79	357(8th)
2021	1-9	1036	4.6	35.0	−30.4	1602	−21.0	+5.9	−26.9	829	−5.80	+0.02	−5.81	384(12th)
2020	2-4	1333	17.3	31.7	−14.3	1542	−6.6	+5.7	−12.3	1192	−1.90	+0.05	−1.95	—
2019	4-6	1429	16.8	27.4	−10.6	1575	−8.4	+0.7	−9.1	1272	−3.16	+0.53	−3.69	480(37th)
2018	7-5	1881	32.8	26.4	+6.4	1596	+6.2	−4.6	+10.8	1769	−0.54	+1.77	−2.31	599(77th)
2017	6-3	1739	28.4	23.8	+4.7	1533	+2.1	−3.7	+5.7	1643	+0.14	+1.38	−1.23	558(65th)
2016	2-8	1192	21.4	35.0	−13.6	1582	−4.6	+5.9	−10.6	1236	−4.43	+0.29	−4.72	455(29th)
2015	1-9	804	7.7	36.1	−28.4	1442	−19.3	+11.8	−31.1	723	−6.73	+0.01	−6.75	351(7th)
2014	3-6	1086	12.7	26.6	−13.9	1375	−16.7	+2.5	−19.2	1021	−4.62	+0.09	−4.72	417(19th)
2013	4-7	1166	10.2	30.8	−20.6	1415	−17.6	+6.4	−24.0	900	−4.77	+0.35	−5.12	409(17th)
2012	1-9	876	9.3	27.3	−18.0	1491	−17.2	+1.2	−18.4	1041	−7.26	+0.07	−7.33	403(15th)
2011	1-9	861	6.6	29.1	−22.5	1420	−19.6	+6.9	−26.6	836	−7.25	+0.05	−7.30	376(11th)
2010	6-5	1421	22.4	25.0	−2.6	1410	−6.7	−0.3	−6.3	1342	−2.90	+0.47	−3.36	494(42nd)
2009	5-5	1539	27.9	28.1	−0.2	1405	+0.4	+5.2	−4.8	1380	−2.85	+1.17	−4.03	509(48th)
2008	3-5	1338	20.6	22.4	−1.8	1325	−5.0	+4.1	−9.1	1273	−3.60	+0.33	−3.93	478(36th)
2007	6-4	1465	23.1	19.3	+3.8	1506	−1.2	−5.2	+4.0	1600	−1.80	+0.80	−2.60	535(57th)
2006	4-6	1383	22.3	24.0	−1.7	1497	−1.7	+0.9	−2.6	1434	−3.37	+0.38	−3.75	506(46th)
2005	5-5	1460	22.5	29.0	−6.5	1560	+0.2	+2.9	−2.7	1431	−1.88	+0.58	−2.46	513(49th)
2004	2-8	1294	11.7	23.3	−11.6	1628	−7.8	−2.0	−5.9	1353	−4.84	+0.28	−5.12	489(40th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.