← Back

CLASS 6A · District 20-6A

Houston Memorial Mustangs

Enrollment: 2,670 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6

Rank

#47

was #47

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1907

#47 of 249

OVR Grade

82.8

#47 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Katy Seven Lakes (0-0) 1275	93% (+25)	—	—	—	—
2	Clear Creek (0-0) 1136	96% (+31)	—	—	—	—
3	@Houston Bellaire (0-0) 757	> 98% (+46)	—	—	—	—
4	Alief Hastings (0-0) 975	> 98% (+37)	—	—	—	—
5	@Houston Stratford (0-0) 1414	89% (+20)	—	—	—	—
7	Houston Westside (0-0) 758	> 98% (+46)	—	—	—	—
8	@Alief Taylor (0-0) 1287	93% (+25)	—	—	—	—
9	Houston Lamar (0-0) 1805	61% (+4)	—	—	—	—
10	@Houston Heights (0-0) 1521	83% (+15)	—	—	—	—
11	Alief Elsik (0-0) 1019	98% (+36)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 20-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		47	Houston Memorial (6) Mustangs	82.8 1907	0-0	0-0	—	—	7.2-0.8	> 98%	D1
2		62	Houston Lamar (4) Texans	81.2 1805	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.8-1.2	> 98%	D1
3		108	Houston Heights (8) Bulldogs	76.9 1521	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.4-2.6	85.7%	D2
4		143	Houston Stratford (9) Spartans	75.3 1414	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.9-3.1	71.7%	D2
5		169	Alief Taylor (5) Lions	73.4 1287	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.2-3.8	35.8%	—
6		204	Alief Elsik (1) Rams	69.3 1019	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.6-5.4	4.7%	—
7		209	Alief Hastings (2) Bears	68.7 975	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.4-5.6	3.1%	—
8		232	Houston Bellaire (3) Cardinals	65.4 757	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.2-6.8	< 2%	—
9		231	Houston Westside (7) Wolves	65.4 758	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.2-6.8	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Houston Memorial’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2004

9-4

Rating 656 (88th)

#2 · 2010

9-6

Rating 636 (85th)

#3 · 2012

8-4

Rating 620 (82nd)

#4 · 2011

9-4

Rating 614 (81st)

#5 · 2013

8-5

Rating 607 (79th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	10-2	1770	38.9	18.3	+20.6	1370	+7.0	−7.2	+14.2	1855	+1.10	+1.41	−0.31	596(76th)
2024	4-7	1295	17.5	21.0	−3.5	1375	−12.1	−3.2	−8.9	1279	−4.81	+0.10	−4.91	476(35th)
2023	5-6	1351	29.7	25.2	+4.5	1216	−4.1	+2.7	−6.8	1330	−3.84	+0.30	−4.14	491(41st)
2022	8-4	1868	31.8	21.3	+10.5	1382	+0.2	−5.2	+5.4	1634	−0.14	+1.59	−1.73	581(72nd)
2021	7-5	1548	23.8	18.1	+5.8	1419	−6.0	−9.7	+3.6	1591	−2.20	+1.16	−3.36	546(61st)
2020	7-3	1577	21.7	15.6	+6.1	1363	−9.3	−8.5	−0.9	1478	−0.58	+0.54	−1.12	524(53rd)
2019	7-5	1580	21.7	18.2	+3.4	1500	−5.8	−8.3	+2.6	1564	−1.04	+0.92	−1.96	535(57th)
2018	4-6	1263	19.8	26.1	−6.3	1547	−5.9	−1.3	−4.6	1385	−3.25	+0.35	−3.59	481(37th)
2017	3-6	1213	19.7	26.7	−7.0	1550	−5.1	+1.6	−6.6	1335	−2.73	+0.05	−2.78	470(33rd)
2016	2-8	1226	13.4	31.0	−17.6	1576	−11.7	+4.8	−16.5	1087	−4.45	+0.03	−4.47	438(24th)
2015	5-6	1485	22.7	18.5	+4.3	1424	−6.6	−6.2	−0.5	1488	−3.13	+0.20	−3.33	516(50th)
2014	8-4	1853	22.9	20.8	+2.1	1462	−4.9	−5.3	+0.4	1509	−0.45	+1.03	−1.48	562(66th)
2013	8-5	1905	25.8	23.8	+2.0	1720	+4.1	−7.9	+12.0	1799	+0.28	+1.57	−1.29	607(79th)
2012	8-4	1884	29.7	21.5	+8.2	1679	+3.9	−12.4	+16.3	1908	+0.49	+1.87	−1.38	620(82nd)
2011	9-4	1903	23.1	18.0	+5.1	1676	+0.7	−11.9	+12.6	1815	+0.82	+2.29	−1.46	614(81st)
2010	9-6	1957	31.7	24.7	+6.9	1719	+6.8	−8.1	+14.9	1872	+0.31	+2.52	−2.22	636(85th)
2009	9-4	1680	24.8	17.7	+7.2	1430	−1.7	−6.5	+4.8	1620	−0.65	+1.37	−2.02	560(65th)
2008	7-2	1638	25.2	10.2	+15.0	1284	−2.0	−7.3	+5.3	1632	−0.63	+0.96	−1.59	574(70th)
2007	6-4	1588	14.6	13.4	+1.2	1514	−9.5	−11.2	+1.7	1543	−1.32	+1.53	−2.85	552(63rd)
2006	5-7	1615	15.8	19.2	−3.5	1569	−7.0	−6.0	−1.0	1476	−2.98	+0.69	−3.67	543(60th)
2005	7-4	1768	19.2	10.7	+8.5	1454	−6.2	−12.4	+6.2	1654	−1.07	+0.78	−1.85	591(75th)
2004	9-4	1933	28.5	11.1	+17.4	1536	+4.5	−13.1	+17.6	1939	−0.13	+2.00	−2.13	656(88th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.