← Back

CLASS 6A · District 20-6A

Alief Elsik Rams

Enrollment: 3,924 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 1

Rank

#204

was #205

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1019

#204 of 249

OVR Grade

69.3

#204 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@New Caney West Fork	32% (-7)	—	—	—	—
2	@Spring Dekaney (0-0) 1361	19% (-14)	—	—	—	—
3	Houston Westside (0-0) 758	75% (+10)	—	—	—	—
4	@Alief Taylor (0-0) 1287	25% (-11)	—	—	—	—
5	Houston Lamar (0-0) 1805	4% (-31)	—	—	—	—
6	@Houston Heights (0-0) 1521	11% (-20)	—	—	—	—
8	Houston Bellaire (0-0) 757	75% (+10)	—	—	—	—
9	@Alief Hastings (0-0) 975	55% (+2)	—	—	—	—
10	Houston Stratford (0-0) 1414	16% (-16)	—	—	—	—
11	@#47Houston Memorial (0-0) 1907	2% (-36)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 20-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		47	Houston Memorial (6) Mustangs	82.8 1907	0-0	0-0	—	—	7.2-0.8	> 98%	D1
2		62	Houston Lamar (4) Texans	81.2 1805	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.8-1.2	> 98%	D1
3		108	Houston Heights (8) Bulldogs	76.9 1521	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.4-2.6	85.7%	D2
4		143	Houston Stratford (9) Spartans	75.3 1414	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.9-3.1	71.7%	D2
5		169	Alief Taylor (5) Lions	73.4 1287	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.2-3.8	35.8%	—
6		204	Alief Elsik (1) Rams	69.3 1019	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.6-5.4	4.7%	—
7		209	Alief Hastings (2) Bears	68.7 975	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.4-5.6	3.1%	—
8		232	Houston Bellaire (3) Cardinals	65.4 757	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.2-6.8	< 2%	—
9		231	Houston Westside (7) Wolves	65.4 758	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.2-6.8	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Alief Elsik’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2012

9-4

Rating 648 (87th)

#2 · 2015

7-4

Rating 561 (66th)

#3 · 2004

4-6

Rating 548 (61st)

#4 · 2014

9-2

Rating 540 (59th)

#5 · 2011

6-5

Rating 519 (52nd)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	2-8	1004	23.1	44.3	−21.2	1534	−3.8	+16.4	−20.2	995	−5.29	+0.13	−5.42	411(17th)
2024	2-9	1040	21.4	39.6	−18.3	1619	−5.2	+10.2	−15.3	1116	−5.66	+0.08	−5.74	431(22nd)
2023	4-6	861	17.8	26.3	−8.5	1257	−13.3	+5.0	−18.3	1042	−4.09	+0.09	−4.18	409(17th)
2022	1-9	731	15.1	35.1	−20.0	1318	−16.8	+11.8	−28.6	784	−6.76	+0.02	−6.78	355(8th)
2021	1-9	817	8.0	37.8	−29.8	1512	−19.5	+8.9	−28.4	789	−5.78	+0.02	−5.80	360(8th)
2020	1-7	948	10.9	42.0	−31.1	1596	−12.5	+14.4	−26.9	827	−4.27	+0.01	−4.28	372(10th)
2019	2-8	1171	14.4	36.7	−22.3	1620	−10.0	+7.8	−17.8	1054	−4.42	+0.25	−4.66	429(22nd)
2018	0-10	1001	11.0	44.6	−33.6	1642	−14.4	+13.4	−27.7	807	−6.69	0.00	−6.69	380(11th)
2017	3-5	1366	16.2	23.9	−7.6	1629	−6.9	−3.8	−3.0	1424	−1.90	+0.64	−2.54	496(43rd)
2016	1-9	1049	10.5	35.9	−25.4	1645	−13.1	+7.0	−20.1	996	−4.97	+0.26	−5.23	410(17th)
2015	7-4	1637	28.9	14.5	+14.4	1332	−1.2	−7.6	+6.4	1659	−1.80	+0.41	−2.21	561(66th)
2014	9-2	1593	33.9	19.4	+14.5	1255	+1.7	−2.3	+4.1	1601	−0.68	+0.88	−1.56	540(59th)
2013	3-6	1243	16.7	22.9	−6.2	1417	−12.1	−1.2	−10.9	1227	−4.57	+0.31	−4.88	460(30th)
2012	9-4	1998	25.2	13.4	+11.8	1598	+1.8	−15.7	+17.5	1937	+0.27	+2.45	−2.18	648(87th)
2011	6-5	1491	27.6	23.6	+4.0	1386	+0.7	+1.4	−0.6	1484	−2.76	+0.52	−3.27	519(52nd)
2010	4-7	1308	28.5	27.4	+1.2	1446	0.0	+1.4	−1.4	1465	−4.93	+0.43	−5.35	501(45th)
2009	6-5	1398	25.5	22.6	+2.9	1462	−1.6	−0.8	−0.8	1480	−2.20	+0.67	−2.87	510(48th)
2008	3-5	1239	23.6	25.5	−1.9	1306	−2.5	+7.1	−9.6	1260	−3.77	+0.15	−3.93	467(32nd)
2007	4-7	1391	24.5	33.5	−9.0	1546	+1.1	+6.8	−5.7	1357	−3.42	+0.74	−4.16	496(43rd)
2006	3-7	1451	27.7	30.9	−3.2	1527	+5.2	+7.0	−1.9	1454	−4.54	+0.34	−4.88	514(49th)
2005	2-7	1311	19.1	35.3	−16.2	1687	−0.2	+8.3	−8.5	1288	−3.79	+0.50	−4.29	480(37th)
2004	4-6	1597	22.3	25.2	−2.9	1630	+3.1	−0.3	+3.5	1586	−2.49	+0.62	−3.11	548(61st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.