← Back

CLASS 6A · District 20-6A

Alief Elsik Rams

Enrollment: 3,924 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 1

Rank

#214

was #213

Record

1-5

1-3 district

Elo

920

#214 of 249

OVR Grade

67.8

#214 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

60.9

#234 of 249 in 6A

DEF Grade

66.6

#196 of 249 in 6A

Perf

753

#224 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	AOS	ADS	WQ	LQ
1	@New Caney West Fork	32% (-7)	L 3-20	694	−32.6	−0.4	—	−0.94
2	@Spring Dekaney (3-3) 1327	16% (-16)	L 0-30	627	−23.6	+11.3	—	−0.89
3	Houston Westside (0-7) 464	76% (+11)	W 55-7	1442	+2.4	+4.7	+0.01	—
4	@Alief Taylor (6-1) 1457	8% (-23)	L 0-49	377	−25.8	+19.1	—	−0.77
5	Houston Lamar (4-2) 1731	4% (-30)	L 0-45	645	−20.3	+13.9	—	−0.64
6	@Houston Heights (2-4) 1367	18% (-14)	L 6-33	731	−20.5	+10.3	—	−0.90
8	Houston Bellaire (1-6) 735	68% (+7)	—	—	—	—	—	—
9	@Alief Hastings (3-4) 1088	33% (-7)	—	—	—	—	—	—
10	Houston Stratford (2-4) 1345	14% (-17)	—	—	—	—	—	—
11	@Houston Memorial (6-0) 1946	< 2% (-41)	—	—	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 20-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		51	Houston Memorial (6) Mustangs	83.3 1946	6-0	4-0	44.5	9.7	7.5-0.5	> 98%	D2
2		76	Houston Lamar (4) Texans	80.1 1731	4-2	4-0	31.8	18.4	6.9-1.1	> 98%	D1
3		132	Alief Taylor (5) Lions	76 1457	6-1	4-1	39.0	16.7	5.3-2.7	> 98%	D1
4		156	Houston Stratford (9) Spartans	74.3 1345	2-4	2-2	21.7	28.2	4.4-3.6	46.4%	D2
5		148	Houston Heights (8) Bulldogs	74.6 1367	2-4	2-2	24.3	23.2	4.3-3.7	45.8%	—
6		195	Alief Hastings (2) Bears	70.4 1088	3-4	2-3	22.4	27.7	3.7-4.3	8.3%	—
7		214	Alief Elsik (1) Rams	67.8 920	1-5	1-3	10.7	30.7	2.2-5.8	< 2%	—
8		231	Houston Bellaire (3) Cardinals	65.1 735	1-6	1-4	12.8	44.8	1.6-6.4	< 2%	—
9		243	Houston Westside (7) Wolves	61 464	0-7	0-5	7.1	47.4	0-8	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Alief Elsik’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2012

9-4

Rating 648 (87th)

#2 · 2015

7-4

Rating 561 (66th)

#3 · 2004

4-6

Rating 548 (61st)

#4 · 2014

9-2

Rating 540 (59th)

#5 · 2011

6-5

Rating 519 (52nd)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	2-8	1004	23.1	44.3	−21.2	1534	−3.8	+16.4	−20.2	995	−5.29	+0.13	−5.42	411(17th)
2024	2-9	1040	21.4	39.6	−18.3	1619	−5.2	+10.2	−15.3	1116	−5.66	+0.08	−5.74	431(22nd)
2023	4-6	861	17.8	26.3	−8.5	1257	−13.3	+5.0	−18.3	1042	−4.09	+0.09	−4.18	409(17th)
2022	1-9	731	15.1	35.1	−20.0	1318	−16.8	+11.8	−28.6	784	−6.76	+0.02	−6.78	355(8th)
2021	1-9	817	8.0	37.8	−29.8	1512	−19.5	+8.9	−28.4	789	−5.78	+0.02	−5.80	360(8th)
2020	1-7	948	10.9	42.0	−31.1	1596	−12.5	+14.4	−26.9	827	−4.27	+0.01	−4.28	372(10th)
2019	2-8	1171	14.4	36.7	−22.3	1620	−10.0	+7.8	−17.8	1054	−4.42	+0.25	−4.66	429(22nd)
2018	0-10	1001	11.0	44.6	−33.6	1642	−14.4	+13.4	−27.7	807	−6.69	0.00	−6.69	380(11th)
2017	3-5	1366	16.2	23.9	−7.6	1629	−6.9	−3.8	−3.0	1424	−1.90	+0.64	−2.54	496(43rd)
2016	1-9	1049	10.5	35.9	−25.4	1645	−13.1	+7.0	−20.1	996	−4.97	+0.26	−5.23	410(17th)
2015	7-4	1637	28.9	14.5	+14.4	1332	−1.2	−7.6	+6.4	1659	−1.80	+0.41	−2.21	561(66th)
2014	9-2	1593	33.9	19.4	+14.5	1255	+1.7	−2.3	+4.1	1601	−0.68	+0.88	−1.56	540(59th)
2013	3-6	1243	16.7	22.9	−6.2	1417	−12.1	−1.2	−10.9	1227	−4.57	+0.31	−4.88	460(30th)
2012	9-4	1998	25.2	13.4	+11.8	1598	+1.8	−15.7	+17.5	1937	+0.27	+2.45	−2.18	648(87th)
2011	6-5	1491	27.6	23.6	+4.0	1386	+0.7	+1.4	−0.6	1484	−2.76	+0.52	−3.27	519(52nd)
2010	4-7	1308	28.5	27.4	+1.2	1446	0.0	+1.4	−1.4	1465	−4.93	+0.43	−5.35	501(45th)
2009	6-5	1398	25.5	22.6	+2.9	1462	−1.6	−0.8	−0.8	1480	−2.20	+0.67	−2.87	510(48th)
2008	3-5	1239	23.6	25.5	−1.9	1306	−2.5	+7.1	−9.6	1260	−3.77	+0.15	−3.93	467(32nd)
2007	4-7	1391	24.5	33.5	−9.0	1546	+1.1	+6.8	−5.7	1357	−3.42	+0.74	−4.16	496(43rd)
2006	3-7	1451	27.7	30.9	−3.2	1527	+5.2	+7.0	−1.9	1454	−4.54	+0.34	−4.88	514(49th)
2005	2-7	1311	19.1	35.3	−16.2	1687	−0.2	+8.3	−8.5	1288	−3.79	+0.50	−4.29	480(37th)
2004	4-6	1597	22.3	25.2	−2.9	1630	+3.1	−0.3	+3.5	1586	−2.49	+0.62	−3.11	548(61st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.