← Back

CLASS 6A · District 20-6A

Houston Stratford Spartans

Enrollment: 2,452 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 9

Rank

#156

was #156

Record

2-4

2-2 district

Elo

1345

#156 of 249

OVR Grade

74.3

#156 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

70.8

#169 of 249 in 6A

DEF Grade

72.8

#146 of 249 in 6A

Perf

1286

#158 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	AOS	ADS	WQ	LQ
1	@#35Tomball (5-1) 2056	10% (-21)	L 0-38	1122	−16.0	−0.9	—	−0.41
2	@Langham Creek (5-1) 1754	21% (-13)	L 7-48	766	−10.9	+18.5	—	−0.64
3	@Alief Hastings (3-4) 1088	84% (+16)	W 33-6	1801	−0.1	−12.2	+0.02	—
5	Houston Memorial (6-0) 1946	9% (-22)	L 14-41	1183	−6.1	+6.6	—	−0.42
6	@Houston Westside (0-7) 464	98% (+36)	W 48-7	1267	−4.6	+4.7	+0.00	—
7	Alief Taylor (6-1) 1457	43% (-3)	L 28-29	1577	+2.2	−0.9	—	−0.85
8	@Houston Lamar (4-2) 1731	17% (-15)	—	—	—	—	—	—
9	Houston Heights (2-4) 1367	48% (-1)	—	—	—	—	—	—
10	@Alief Elsik (1-5) 920	86% (+17)	—	—	—	—	—	—
11	Houston Bellaire (1-6) 735	93% (+24)	—	—	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 20-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		51	Houston Memorial (6) Mustangs	83.3 1946	6-0	4-0	44.5	9.7	7.5-0.5	> 98%	D2
2		76	Houston Lamar (4) Texans	80.1 1731	4-2	4-0	31.8	18.4	6.9-1.1	> 98%	D1
3		132	Alief Taylor (5) Lions	76 1457	6-1	4-1	39.0	16.7	5.3-2.7	> 98%	D1
4		156	Houston Stratford (9) Spartans	74.3 1345	2-4	2-2	21.7	28.2	4.4-3.6	46.4%	D2
5		148	Houston Heights (8) Bulldogs	74.6 1367	2-4	2-2	24.3	23.2	4.3-3.7	45.8%	—
6		195	Alief Hastings (2) Bears	70.4 1088	3-4	2-3	22.4	27.7	3.7-4.3	8.3%	—
7		214	Alief Elsik (1) Rams	67.8 920	1-5	1-3	10.7	30.7	2.2-5.8	< 2%	—
8		231	Houston Bellaire (3) Cardinals	65.1 735	1-6	1-4	12.8	44.8	1.6-6.4	< 2%	—
9		243	Houston Westside (7) Wolves	61 464	0-7	0-5	7.1	47.4	0-8	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Houston Stratford’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2021

10-2

Rating 606 (79th)

#2 · 2006

10-2

Rating 601 (78th)

#3 · 2007

9-4

Rating 589 (75th)

#4 · 2022

8-3

Rating 588 (74th)

#5 · 2023

9-4

Rating 583 (73rd)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	5-7	1430	32.4	32.2	+0.2	1365	+0.4	+5.7	−5.3	1368	−4.31	+0.17	−4.48	510(48th)
2024	8-4	1650	43.8	26.0	+17.8	1353	+12.1	+2.0	+10.1	1753	−1.49	+0.78	−2.27	571(69th)
2023	9-4	1769	40.8	25.2	+15.6	1306	+8.5	+2.3	+6.2	1655	−0.77	+0.77	−1.54	583(73rd)
2022	8-3	1762	41.9	19.8	+22.1	1331	+8.1	−5.3	+13.4	1836	−0.35	+1.36	−1.71	588(74th)
2021	10-2	1749	37.1	15.2	+21.9	1327	+5.6	−8.7	+14.4	1859	+0.84	+1.37	−0.53	606(79th)
2020	6-4	1348	30.1	23.8	+6.3	1202	−2.4	+3.7	−6.2	1346	−2.10	+0.47	−2.56	477(36th)
2019	4-6	1227	17.8	25.3	−7.5	1422	−10.0	+1.4	−11.4	1215	−3.16	+0.56	−3.72	454(29th)
2018	4-6	1330	28.7	26.1	+2.6	1374	−1.9	+2.3	−4.2	1396	−3.68	+0.18	−3.86	488(40th)
2017	6-4	1779	21.6	20.9	+0.7	1574	−2.8	−5.5	+2.7	1569	−0.30	+0.76	−1.06	552(63rd)
2016	7-4	1730	20.9	19.3	+1.6	1502	−4.9	−7.0	+2.1	1553	−0.62	+0.98	−1.60	546(61st)
2015	2-0	1642	25.5	6.5	+19.0	1561	+5.0	−18.0	+23.0	2076	+0.74	+0.74	0.00	—
2014	0-2	1236	15.5	29.0	−13.5	1723	−7.6	+2.0	−9.6	1260	−1.36	0.00	−1.36	—
2013	0-2	1359	27.5	34.0	−6.5	1710	+3.4	+2.3	+1.0	1526	−1.33	0.00	−1.33	—
2012	1-1	1418	17.5	24.0	−6.5	1448	−7.4	−0.8	−6.7	1333	−0.43	+0.04	−0.46	—
2011	0-2	1408	14.0	40.0	−26.0	1775	−10.6	+5.3	−15.9	1103	−1.29	0.00	−1.29	—
2010	1-1	1674	25.5	27.0	−1.5	1660	−1.3	−5.6	+4.3	1607	−0.49	+0.19	−0.68	—
2009	8-3	1724	27.4	18.1	+9.3	1412	−1.2	−5.8	+4.5	1613	−0.07	+1.06	−1.13	559(65th)
2008	5-4	1498	18.3	16.8	+1.6	1379	−7.8	−2.9	−4.9	1378	−2.20	+0.39	−2.58	512(49th)
2007	9-4	1792	31.5	23.2	+8.3	1495	+6.1	−2.3	+8.4	1710	−0.81	+2.09	−2.90	589(75th)
2006	10-2	1817	29.8	16.7	+13.2	1450	+3.6	−7.7	+11.3	1783	+0.30	+1.31	−1.01	601(78th)
2005	5-5	1366	23.1	19.4	+3.7	1320	−3.8	+0.3	−4.1	1397	−3.19	+0.51	−3.69	500(44th)
2004	4-6	1433	13.0	13.0	0.0	1361	−13.7	−8.2	−5.5	1362	−3.66	+0.43	−4.09	518(51st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.