← Back

CLASS 6A · District 20-6A

Alief Taylor Lions

Enrollment: 2,783 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 5

Rank

#169

was #169

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1287

#169 of 249

OVR Grade

73.4

#169 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Houston Westbury	83% (+15)	—	—	—	—
2	Pasadena Dobie (0-0) 1430	35% (-6)	—	—	—	—
3	@Houston Heights (0-0) 1521	27% (-9)	—	—	—	—
4	Alief Elsik (0-0) 1019	75% (+11)	—	—	—	—
5	@Houston Bellaire (0-0) 757	90% (+21)	—	—	—	—
6	Alief Hastings (0-0) 975	79% (+12)	—	—	—	—
7	@Houston Stratford (0-0) 1414	37% (-5)	—	—	—	—
8	#47Houston Memorial (0-0) 1907	7% (-25)	—	—	—	—
9	@Houston Westside (0-0) 758	90% (+21)	—	—	—	—
11	Houston Lamar (0-0) 1805	10% (-21)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 20-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		47	Houston Memorial (6) Mustangs	82.8 1907	0-0	0-0	—	—	7.2-0.8	> 98%	D1
2		62	Houston Lamar (4) Texans	81.2 1805	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.8-1.2	> 98%	D1
3		108	Houston Heights (8) Bulldogs	76.9 1521	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.4-2.6	85.7%	D2
4		143	Houston Stratford (9) Spartans	75.3 1414	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.9-3.1	71.7%	D2
5		169	Alief Taylor (5) Lions	73.4 1287	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.2-3.8	35.8%	—
6		204	Alief Elsik (1) Rams	69.3 1019	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.6-5.4	4.7%	—
7		209	Alief Hastings (2) Bears	68.7 975	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.4-5.6	3.1%	—
8		232	Houston Bellaire (3) Cardinals	65.4 757	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.2-6.8	< 2%	—
9		231	Houston Westside (7) Wolves	65.4 758	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.2-6.8	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Alief Taylor’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2016

9-2

Rating 658 (89th)

#2 · 2012

8-4

Rating 617 (82nd)

#3 · 2010

10-2

Rating 606 (79th)

#4 · 2015

8-3

Rating 606 (79th)

#5 · 2013

8-4

Rating 602 (78th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	4-6	1148	21.6	27.1	−5.5	1318	−11.1	+1.1	−12.2	1194	−4.36	+0.29	−4.65	451(28th)
2024	1-9	1012	21.1	32.5	−11.4	1392	−9.1	+7.9	−17.0	1074	−7.07	+0.02	−7.09	423(20th)
2023	4-6	1197	22.3	24.5	−2.2	1305	−7.2	+2.2	−9.3	1266	−3.85	+0.07	−3.92	469(33rd)
2022	5-6	1424	19.5	24.1	−4.6	1471	−8.3	−3.0	−5.3	1368	−3.09	+0.33	−3.41	496(42nd)
2021	6-5	1577	29.6	26.8	+2.8	1573	+4.4	−0.4	+4.9	1621	−1.23	+0.46	−1.69	539(59th)
2020	2-4	1507	18.7	26.0	−7.3	1765	−1.9	−4.9	+3.0	1575	−1.09	+0.21	−1.30	—
2019	3-7	1427	15.7	26.3	−10.6	1705	−6.5	−2.3	−4.2	1395	−2.39	+0.50	−2.90	497(43rd)
2018	3-7	1559	15.5	29.2	−13.7	1699	−8.2	−1.1	−7.2	1321	−2.52	+0.43	−2.95	500(44th)
2017	3-5	1622	26.6	27.8	−1.1	1536	+2.8	+1.8	+1.0	1524	−2.56	+0.66	−3.23	533(56th)
2016	9-2	2045	39.1	16.0	+23.1	1563	+14.8	−10.4	+25.2	2130	+2.27	+3.08	−0.80	658(89th)
2015	8-3	1689	30.6	10.4	+20.3	1387	+1.4	−13.8	+15.2	1879	−0.82	+0.98	−1.80	606(79th)
2014	6-5	1550	25.3	25.5	−0.2	1425	−3.2	−0.5	−2.7	1433	−2.72	+0.78	−3.50	514(49th)
2013	8-4	1852	25.5	17.9	+7.6	1618	+1.3	−10.1	+11.4	1785	+0.04	+1.61	−1.57	602(78th)
2012	8-4	1804	23.2	15.2	+8.0	1659	+1.1	−13.8	+14.9	1872	+0.48	+1.88	−1.40	617(82nd)
2011	7-5	1379	19.7	18.0	+1.7	1469	−6.9	−6.3	−0.5	1486	−2.21	+0.82	−3.04	522(53rd)
2010	10-2	1817	39.6	23.0	+16.6	1505	+11.7	−4.6	+16.3	1908	+0.72	+1.44	−0.71	606(79th)
2009	9-4	1645	31.2	20.4	+10.8	1340	+2.7	−2.7	+5.3	1633	−1.42	+1.14	−2.55	564(67th)
2008	6-4	1418	25.8	23.1	+2.7	1341	−1.1	+2.6	−3.7	1407	−1.71	+0.32	−2.03	503(45th)
2007	3-7	1086	18.4	23.3	−4.9	1521	−5.8	−0.5	−5.4	1366	−4.51	+0.28	−4.79	469(33rd)
2006	6-5	1469	16.4	19.9	−3.5	1506	−6.3	−3.9	−2.4	1439	−1.96	+0.54	−2.50	514(49th)
2005	3-6	1260	11.2	28.4	−17.2	1603	−10.3	+2.6	−12.9	1177	−3.18	+0.37	−3.55	462(31st)
2004	6-5	1517	23.1	21.5	+1.6	1594	+3.5	−2.4	+5.9	1646	−2.07	+1.60	−3.67	549(62nd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.