| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 59% (+4) | W 31-30 | 2455 | +18.2 | −20.0 | +0.59 | — | |
| 2 | @Katy Tompkins (3-3) 1870 |
83% (+15) | W 35-7 | 2530 | +12.3 | −28.9 | +0.31 | — |
| 3 | #10Fort Bend Ridge Point (7-0) 2445 |
20% (-13) | L 35-56 | 1862 | +25.3 | +10.8 | — | −0.09 |
| 5 | 34% (-6) | W 31-14 | 2754 | +22.6 | −27.6 | +0.81 | — | |
| 6 | Cy Springs (2-4) 1559 |
91% (+23) | W 37-21 | 2128 | +8.0 | −17.2 | +0.27 | — |
| 7 | Richmond George Ranch (3-3) 1355 |
97% (+33) | W 49-8 | 2349 | +18.4 | −15.6 | +0.11 | — |
| 8 | 73% (+9) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 9 | Cy Park (1-5) 782 |
> 98% (+57) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | 74% (+10) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 11 | Richmond Foster (2-4) 1233 |
> 98% (+39) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#24
was #24
Record
5-1
3-0 district
Elo
2199
#24 of 249
OVR Grade
87.2
#24 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
87.3
#23 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
89
#23 of 249 in 6A
Perf
2346
#20 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 23-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Bridgeland’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2024
12-2
Rating 694 (93rd)
#2 · 2020
12-1
Rating 672 (90th)
#3 · 2021
11-3
Rating 649 (87th)
#4 · 2023
9-2
Rating 637 (85th)
#5 · 2025
7-4
Rating 629 (84th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.