← Back
CLASS 6A · District 1-6A

El Paso Coronado Thunderbirds

Enrollment: 2,586 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 5
Rank
#196
was #195
Record
4-3
2-1 district
Elo
1079
#196 of 249
OVR Grade
70.2
#196 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
66.3
#210 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
68.5
#181 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1000
#200 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
El Paso El Dorado
23% (-12) L 21-28 984 −13.8 +6.8 — −0.95
2
@Odessa (2-5) 906
46% (-2) L 11-19 893 −21.5 +2.7 — −0.98
3
El Paso Burges
58% (+3) W 44-17 1285 −1.8 +6.8 +0.01 —
4
@El Paso Del Valle
13% (-18) W 28-14 1476 −7.5 −6.5 +0.10 —
5
@El Paso Socorro (2-3) 552
89% (+20) W 38-35 677 −10.4 +22.6 +0.00 —
6 89% (+20) W 27-24 586 −21.8 +14.7 +0.01 —
7
@El Paso Eastwood (5-2) 1614
11% (-20) L 14-45 1094 −10.1 +6.1 — −0.75
8
El Paso Eastlake (4-2) 1323
26% (-10) — — — — — —
9 7% (-25) — — — — — —
11
El Paso Franklin (3-3) 1129
45% (-2) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 1-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 84
Spartans
79.8
1710
6-1 3-0 37.6 22.6 5.8-0.1 > 98% D1
2 98
Troopers
78.3
1614
5-2 2-1 43.3 20.6 4.9-1.1 > 98% D2
3 160
Falcons
73.9
1323
4-2 0-2 34.7 41.3 3.4-2.6 88% D1
4 186
Cougars
71
1129
3-3 2-0 30.7 23.2 3-3 68.8% D2
5 196
Thunderbirds
70.2
1079
4-3 2-1 26.1 26.0 2.8-3.2 43.2% —
6 239
Bulldogs
62.3
552
2-3 0-2 30.2 31.8 0.5-5.5 < 2% —
7 238
Rams
62.5
569
0-7 0-3 15.1 43.4 0.6-5.4 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how El Paso Coronado’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2009
11-1
Rating 605 (79th)
#2 · 2010
8-4
Rating 573 (70th)
#3 · 2013
7-3
Rating 525 (54th)
#4 · 2018
7-4
Rating 515 (50th)
#5 · 2006
9-2
Rating 505 (46th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 3-7 834 24.2 38.4 −14.2 1005 −17.0 +16.8 −33.7 657 −6.30 +0.02 −6.32 351(7th)
2024 5-4 1092 30.1 23.6 +6.6 985 −10.8 +3.5 −14.3 1144 −3.52 +0.09 −3.61 440(24th)
2023 5-5 1013 24.3 21.8 +2.5 986 −15.5 +2.5 −18.0 1050 −4.21 +0.14 −4.35 423(20th)
2022 3-7 863 27.4 37.0 −9.6 1154 −9.6 +13.3 −22.9 928 −6.07 +0.06 −6.13 386(12th)
2021 1-9 829 6.3 33.4 −27.1 1347 −25.6 +9.1 −34.7 632 −7.61 +0.02 −7.63 340(6th)
2020 2-4 1022 16.8 32.5 −15.7 1264 −16.9 +8.5 −25.4 864 −3.29 +0.04 −3.33 —
2019 2-8 1055 20.4 30.0 −9.6 1295 −14.0 +3.7 −17.6 1059 −6.55 +0.03 −6.58 418(19th)
2018 7-4 1523 26.0 20.5 +5.5 1280 −5.8 −4.5 −1.3 1468 −2.27 +0.77 −3.04 515(50th)
2017 5-6 1290 28.2 35.4 −7.2 1373 −6.1 +5.6 −11.7 1207 −3.97 +0.31 −4.28 459(30th)
2016 3-7 1049 25.0 24.5 +0.5 1282 −12.7 −2.6 −10.1 1248 −5.67 +0.08 −5.75 444(26th)
2015 2-8 1110 22.7 33.1 −10.4 1410 −7.8 +4.6 −12.3 1191 −6.52 +0.08 −6.60 441(25th)
2014 4-5 1266 28.3 34.9 −6.6 1378 −3.3 +7.6 −10.9 1227 −3.13 +0.88 −4.01 460(31st)
2013 7-3 1452 37.3 25.2 +12.1 1298 +2.2 −0.9 +3.1 1576 −1.27 +0.89 −2.17 525(54th)
2012 4-5 1179 31.3 26.3 +5.0 1247 −1.5 +3.6 −5.1 1374 −3.62 +0.06 −3.68 474(35th)
2011 4-7 1175 24.5 24.8 −0.3 1256 −9.2 +1.6 −10.8 1230 −5.58 +0.06 −5.64 457(30th)
2010 8-4 1753 31.6 19.0 +12.6 1294 −0.1 −4.9 +4.8 1620 −1.50 +0.97 −2.47 573(70th)
2009 11-1 1818 35.7 15.8 +19.8 1278 +3.9 −6.8 +10.7 1767 +1.11 +1.33 −0.21 605(79th)
2008 7-4 1406 27.2 20.6 +6.5 1147 −7.0 +0.8 −7.8 1305 −2.99 +0.38 −3.37 488(40th)
2007 8-4 1390 32.2 23.9 +8.2 1257 +1.7 +7.1 −5.4 1364 −2.27 +0.54 −2.81 497(43rd)
2006 9-2 1373 30.3 18.5 +11.7 1197 −0.1 +2.8 −2.9 1428 −0.62 +1.18 −1.80 505(46th)
2005 7-4 1113 23.5 25.9 −2.4 1238 −6.2 +7.8 −14.0 1150 −2.84 +0.39 −3.23 444(26th)
2004 2-8 978 16.3 23.8 −7.5 1141 −15.5 +7.4 −22.9 928 −7.29 +0.05 −7.33 405(16th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.