| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @Midland (4-3) 1670 |
65% (+6) | W 31-17 | 2112 | +9.4 | −15.0 | +0.12 | — |
| 2 | @El Paso Chapin |
85% (+17) | W 35-14 | 1661 | −0.3 | −6.7 | +0.05 | — |
| 3 | El Paso Hanks |
95% (+29) | W 49-44 | 1015 | +8.8 | +28.2 | +0.02 | — |
| 4 | 17% (-15) | L 24-38 | 1800 | +6.4 | −5.6 | — | −0.36 | |
| 5 | @El Paso Montwood (0-7) 569 |
> 98% (+39) | W 44-7 | 1436 | −4.8 | −2.3 | +0.01 | — |
| 6 | El Paso Eastwood (5-2) 1614 |
43% (-3) | W 35-31 | 1969 | +10.9 | −7.9 | +0.31 | — |
| 7 | @El Paso Eastlake (4-2) 1323 |
76% (+11) | W 45-7 | 2086 | +1.7 | −21.7 | +0.12 | — |
| 9 | El Paso Coronado (4-3) 1079 |
93% (+25) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | @El Paso Franklin (3-3) 1129 |
92% (+23) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | El Paso Socorro (2-3) 552 |
> 98% (+46) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#84
was #91
Record
6-1
3-0 district
Elo
1710
#84 of 249
OVR Grade
79.8
#84 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
78.2
#90 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
78.8
#88 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1726
#88 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 1-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how El Paso Pebble Hills’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2022
10-2
Rating 588 (74th)
#2 · 2017
8-3
Rating 538 (58th)
#3 · 2025
7-4
Rating 517 (51st)
#4 · 2021
6-5
Rating 510 (48th)
#5 · 2023
8-3
Rating 508 (47th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.