| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | El Paso Chapin |
89% (+20) | L 14-39 | 511 | −21.3 | +18.3 | — | −0.98 |
| 2 | @Midland Lee (4-3) 1669 |
7% (-24) | L 17-48 | 771 | −13.9 | +15.2 | — | −0.60 |
| 3 | @El Paso Andress |
67% (+7) | L 17-20 | 955 | −20.4 | +1.4 | — | −0.98 |
| 4 | El Paso Parkland |
84% (+16) | W 62-13 | 1839 | +16.3 | +2.7 | +0.01 | — |
| 6 | El Paso Socorro (2-3) 552 |
90% (+21) | W 37-13 | 1202 | −11.4 | +0.6 | +0.00 | — |
| 7 | @El Paso Montwood (0-7) 569 |
90% (+21) | W 37-6 | 1286 | −11.8 | −3.3 | +0.01 | — |
| 8 | El Paso Eastwood (5-2) 1614 |
12% (-19) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | @El Paso Eastlake (4-2) 1323 |
31% (-8) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | El Paso Pebble Hills (6-1) 1710 |
8% (-23) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | @El Paso Coronado (4-3) 1079 |
55% (+2) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#186
was #193
Record
3-3
2-0 district
Elo
1129
#186 of 249
OVR Grade
71
#186 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
67.7
#199 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
70.1
#173 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1094
#189 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 1-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance


Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how El Paso Franklin’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2012
10-2
Rating 614 (81st)
#2 · 2014
9-2
Rating 605 (79th)
#3 · 2018
9-3
Rating 589 (75th)
#4 · 2005
11-2
Rating 579 (71st)
#5 · 2004
10-2
Rating 565 (67th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.





