| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @El Paso Bel Air |
> 98% (+46) | W 65-13 | 1559 | +12.2 | +9.8 | +0.00 | — |
| 2 | Canutillo |
68% (+7) | W 49-17 | 2002 | +15.0 | −5.0 | +0.08 | — |
| 3 | @Corner Canyon (UT) |
< 2% (-39) | L 7-52 | — | — | — | — | −0.06 |
| 4 | @El Paso Americas |
92% (+23) | W 64-13 | 2202 | +24.5 | −3.5 | +0.02 | — |
| 5 | El Paso Eastlake (4-2) 1323 |
55% (+2) | W 42-0 | 2186 | −1.3 | −28.7 | +0.18 | — |
| 6 | @El Paso Pebble Hills (6-1) 1710 |
57% (+3) | L 31-35 | 1601 | +5.4 | +1.3 | — | −0.75 |
| 7 | El Paso Coronado (4-3) 1079 |
89% (+20) | W 45-14 | 1741 | +7.9 | −1.8 | +0.04 | — |
| 8 | @El Paso Franklin (3-3) 1129 |
88% (+19) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | El Paso Socorro (2-3) 552 |
> 98% (+43) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | @El Paso Montwood (0-7) 569 |
> 98% (+42) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#98
was #104
Record
5-2
2-1 district
Elo
1614
#98 of 249
OVR Grade
78.3
#98 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
82.5
#58 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
79
#83 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1882
#64 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 1-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how El Paso Eastwood’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2022
9-3
Rating 561 (66th)
#2 · 2021
8-5
Rating 553 (63rd)
#3 · 2015
9-3
Rating 552 (63rd)
#4 · 2025
10-2
Rating 534 (57th)
#5 · 2023
9-2
Rating 509 (48th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.