← Back
CLASS 6A · District 1-6A

El Paso Eastlake Falcons

Enrollment: 3,055 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 1
Rank
#183
was #183
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1179
#183 of 249
OVR Grade
71.8
#183 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
El Paso Del Valle
21% (-13)
2
@El Paso El Dorado
51% (+0)
3
Midland Lee (0-0) 1713
10% (-21)
4
@El Paso Bel Air
98% (+35)
5
@El Paso Eastwood (0-0) 1452
24% (-11)
7 19% (-14)
8
@El Paso Coronado (0-0) 877
78% (+12)
9
El Paso Franklin (0-0) 1400
28% (-9)
10
@El Paso Socorro (0-0) 593
92% (+23)
11 83% (+15)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 1-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 107
Spartans
76.9
1521
0-0 0-0 4.9-1.1 > 98% D1
2 133
Troopers
75.9
1452
0-0 0-0 4.6-1.4 97.9% D2
3 145
Cougars
75.1
1400
0-0 0-0 4.3-1.7 96.7% D2
4 183
Falcons
71.8
1179
0-0 0-0 3.3-2.7 81.9% D1
5 224
Thunderbirds
67.2
877
0-0 0-0 1.8-4.2 14.5%
6 227
Rams
66.1
806
0-0 0-0 1.5-4.5 8.7%
7 244
Bulldogs
62.9
593
0-0 0-0 0.7-5.3 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how El Paso Eastlake’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2021
10-2
Rating 537 (58th)
#2 · 2024
7-4
Rating 503 (45th)
#3 · 2022
6-5
Rating 459 (30th)
#4 · 2025
5-6
Rating 444 (26th)
#5 · 2023
5-5
Rating 391 (13th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 5-6 1173 37.0 36.6 +0.4 1209 −2.1 +12.7 −14.9 1129 −4.39 +0.10 −4.49 444(26th)
2024 7-4 1406 36.9 28.0 +8.9 1133 +0.6 +4.2 −3.7 1409 −2.82 +0.43 −3.25 503(45th)
2023 5-5 821 27.2 25.3 +1.9 986 −13.7 +8.6 −22.3 943 −4.32 +0.07 −4.39 391(13th)
2022 6-5 1257 22.0 21.9 +0.1 1175 −14.2 −2.7 −11.5 1211 −3.64 +0.15 −3.79 459(30th)
2021 10-2 1606 35.1 21.6 +13.5 1274 +1.3 −2.0 +3.4 1584 −0.46 +0.79 −1.25 537(58th)
2020 4-1 1495 44.0 29.6 +14.4 1298 +9.3 +3.5 +5.8 1645 −0.18 +0.53 −0.71
2019 1-2 1216 39.0 41.7 −2.7 1325 +2.9 +13.8 −11.0 1226 −1.72 +0.09 −1.81
2018 1-2 1287 14.3 27.0 −12.7 1360 −15.9 +2.0 −17.9 1053 −1.25 +0.32 −1.57
2017 1-0 1325 34.0 12.0 +22.0 1550 −4.5 −23.1 +18.7 1967 +0.33 +0.33 0.00
2016 0-1 1011 35.0 45.0 −10.0 1687 −1.9 +4.1 −6.0 1351 −0.73 0.00 −0.73
2015 0-1 995 49.0 70.0 −21.0 1622 +13.4 +29.8 −16.4 1090 −0.73 0.00 −0.73
2014 0-1 982 23.0 31.0 −8.0 1619 −11.0 −6.5 −4.5 1387 −0.85 0.00 −0.85
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.