← Back
CLASS 6A · District 5-6A

Frisco Wakeland Wolverines

Enrollment: 2,245 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 8
Rank
#113
was #113
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1507
#113 of 249
OVR Grade
76.7
#113 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
Richland
37% (-5)
2
@Justin Northwest (0-0) 1333
67% (+7)
3
Garland Rowlett (0-0) 1534
47% (-1)
5
@#11Denton Guyer (0-0) 2421
2% (-37)
6
#29Lewisville (0-0) 2080
8% (-23)
7
@Lewisville Hebron (0-0) 1750
27% (-10)
8
Flower Mound (0-0) 1430
58% (+3)
9
@Denton Braswell (0-0) 1358
65% (+6)
10
Little Elm (0-0) 1150
82% (+14)
11 33% (-7)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 5-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 11
Wildcats
90.5
2421
0-0 0-0 6.6-0.4 > 98% D2
2 29
Fighting Farmers
85.4
2080
0-0 0-0 5.6-1.4 > 98% D1
3 67
Hawks
80.4
1750
0-0 0-0 4.1-2.9 81.8% D1
4 81
Marauders
79.3
1680
0-0 0-0 3.7-3.3 69.9% D2
5 113
Wolverines
76.7
1507
0-0 0-0 2.7-4.3 25.4%
6 140
Jaguars
75.6
1430
0-0 0-0 2.3-4.7 14.6%
7 155
Bengals
74.5
1358
0-0 0-0 1.9-5.1 8.3%
8 190
Lobos
71.3
1150
0-0 0-0 0.9-6.1 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Frisco Wakeland’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2021 1-0 1590 55.0 7.0 +48.0 1234 +19.2 −15.9 +35.1 2377 +0.10 +0.10 0.00
2020 1-0 1512 35.0 7.0 +28.0 1404 −0.4 −29.2 +28.8 2220 +0.10 +0.10 0.00
2019 0-1 1421 22.0 31.0 −9.0 1349 −8.6 +3.0 −11.6 1211 −0.90 0.00 −0.90
2017 1-0 1551 41.0 6.0 +35.0 1514 +13.2 −23.0 +36.3 2406 +0.05 +0.05 0.00
2016 1-0 1511 54.0 28.0 +26.0 1081 +8.3 −1.0 +9.3 1731 +0.06 +0.06 0.00
2013 1-1 1452 37.5 25.5 +12.0 1229 +6.0 −1.6 +7.6 1689 −0.81 +0.14 −0.95
2012 2-0 1447 56.5 29.0 +27.5 1248 +16.9 −0.7 +17.5 1938 +0.18 +0.18 0.00
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.