← Back

CLASS 6A · District 5-6A

Flower Mound Jaguars

Enrollment: 3,393 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 3

Rank

#140

was #140

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1430

#140 of 249

OVR Grade

75.6

#140 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@McKinney Boyd (0-0) 1305	63% (+5)	—	—	—	—
2	@Keller Timber Creek (0-0) 1477	45% (-2)	—	—	—	—
3	Fort Worth Boswell (0-0) 1376	56% (+2)	—	—	—	—
5	Denton Braswell (0-0) 1358	57% (+3)	—	—	—	—
6	@Little Elm (0-0) 1150	76% (+11)	—	—	—	—
7	Flower Mound Marcus (0-0) 1680	26% (-10)	—	—	—	—
8	@Frisco Wakeland (0-0) 1507	42% (-3)	—	—	—	—
9	#29Lewisville (0-0) 2080	6% (-26)	—	—	—	—
10	@Lewisville Hebron (0-0) 1750	21% (-13)	—	—	—	—
11	#11Denton Guyer (0-0) 2421	< 2% (-40)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 5-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		11	Denton Guyer (6) Wildcats	90.5 2421	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.6-0.4	> 98%	D2
2		29	Lewisville (1) Fighting Farmers	85.4 2080	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.6-1.4	> 98%	D1
3		67	Lewisville Hebron (2) Hawks	80.4 1750	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.1-2.9	81.8%	D1
4		81	Flower Mound Marcus (4) Marauders	79.3 1680	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.7-3.3	69.9%	D2
5		113	Frisco Wakeland (8) Wolverines	76.7 1507	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.7-4.3	25.4%	—
6		140	Flower Mound (3) Jaguars	75.6 1430	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.3-4.7	14.6%	—
7		155	Denton Braswell (5) Bengals	74.5 1358	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.9-5.1	8.3%	—
8		190	Little Elm (7) Lobos	71.3 1150	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.9-6.1	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Flower Mound’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2010

7-4

Rating 640 (86th)

#2 · 2011

3-7

Rating 604 (78th)

#3 · 2021

5-6

Rating 602 (78th)

#4 · 2019

8-4

Rating 600 (77th)

#5 · 2008

6-4

Rating 598 (77th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	2-8	1327	18.4	33.2	−14.8	1690	−5.3	+1.7	−7.0	1325	−4.11	+0.08	−4.19	484(38th)
2024	5-5	1525	30.1	30.2	−0.1	1768	+4.9	−4.8	+9.7	1743	−1.21	+0.66	−1.87	562(66th)
2023	5-5	1553	28.3	29.9	−1.6	1605	+1.3	+0.4	+0.8	1521	−1.59	+0.86	−2.44	535(57th)
2022	3-7	1528	27.3	34.8	−7.5	1686	+3.4	+2.2	+1.2	1529	−3.46	+0.46	−3.92	526(54th)
2021	5-6	1709	31.0	30.7	+0.3	1882	+10.0	−5.4	+15.4	1886	−0.88	+1.46	−2.34	602(78th)
2020	4-6	1558	27.1	27.9	−0.8	1704	+2.1	−6.4	+8.4	1710	−2.47	+0.65	−3.12	545(60th)
2019	8-4	1835	40.7	27.9	+12.7	1579	+14.7	−0.9	+15.5	1888	+0.51	+1.92	−1.42	600(77th)
2018	8-3	1785	38.5	26.3	+12.2	1529	+12.4	−0.6	+13.0	1825	+0.34	+2.02	−1.68	587(74th)
2017	4-6	1671	24.5	22.7	+1.8	1650	+0.4	−7.6	+8.0	1699	−2.04	+0.80	−2.84	560(65th)
2016	4-6	1541	31.9	30.4	+1.5	1717	+5.4	−3.7	+9.1	1728	−2.29	+0.49	−2.77	552(63rd)
2015	1-9	1163	19.0	34.0	−15.0	1896	−1.6	−2.1	+0.5	1512	−4.42	+0.68	−5.10	506(46th)
2014	1-9	1235	19.9	38.0	−18.1	1882	−1.6	+1.3	−2.9	1428	−4.47	+0.16	−4.63	501(44th)
2013	2-8	1405	17.4	40.7	−23.3	1825	−1.8	+6.8	−8.6	1285	−3.17	+0.47	−3.65	492(41st)
2012	3-7	1461	18.5	28.5	−10.0	1821	−2.5	−4.4	+1.9	1548	−2.28	+0.87	−3.15	533(56th)
2011	3-7	1686	37.9	42.7	−4.8	1946	+17.8	+5.0	+12.7	1818	−1.34	+1.33	−2.67	604(78th)
2010	7-4	1840	48.8	46.6	+2.2	1946	+28.3	+9.0	+19.3	1983	+1.51	+3.24	−1.73	640(86th)
2009	6-5	1710	34.5	42.7	−8.2	1802	+11.4	+7.0	+4.4	1611	+0.08	+1.27	−1.19	564(67th)
2008	6-4	1717	30.2	20.2	+10.0	1681	+6.6	−9.9	+16.5	1911	−0.19	+1.35	−1.55	598(77th)
2007	6-5	1638	23.6	17.9	+5.7	1595	−0.9	−9.4	+8.6	1714	−1.53	+1.02	−2.55	568(68th)
2006	8-3	1842	27.6	16.8	+10.8	1514	+2.7	−8.0	+10.8	1769	+0.41	+2.24	−1.83	596(76th)
2005	6-4	1582	30.1	24.4	+5.7	1609	+7.0	−3.1	+10.1	1752	−0.95	+0.99	−1.94	567(68th)
2004	5-5	1456	23.1	27.6	−4.5	1604	−0.4	+0.7	−1.0	1474	−2.04	+0.92	−2.96	520(52nd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.