← Back
CLASS 6A · District 5-6A

Flower Mound Marcus Marauders

Enrollment: 3,004 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4
Rank
#81
was #81
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1680
#81 of 249
OVR Grade
79.3
#81 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
Justin Northwest (0-0) 1333
81% (+14)
2
@Arlington Martin (0-0) 1633
55% (+2)
3 87% (+18)
5
@#29Lewisville (0-0) 2080
16% (-16)
6 43% (-3)
7
@Flower Mound (0-0) 1430
74% (+10)
8
Denton Braswell (0-0) 1358
79% (+13)
9
@Little Elm (0-0) 1150
90% (+21)
10
@#11Denton Guyer (0-0) 2421
4% (-30)
11
Frisco Wakeland (0-0) 1507
67% (+7)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 5-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 11
Wildcats
90.5
2421
0-0 0-0 6.6-0.4 > 98% D2
2 29
Fighting Farmers
85.4
2080
0-0 0-0 5.6-1.4 > 98% D1
3 67
Hawks
80.4
1750
0-0 0-0 4.1-2.9 81.8% D1
4 81
Marauders
79.3
1680
0-0 0-0 3.7-3.3 69.9% D2
5 113
Wolverines
76.7
1507
0-0 0-0 2.7-4.3 25.4%
6 140
Jaguars
75.6
1430
0-0 0-0 2.3-4.7 14.6%
7 155
Bengals
74.5
1358
0-0 0-0 1.9-5.1 8.3%
8 190
Lobos
71.3
1150
0-0 0-0 0.9-6.1 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Flower Mound Marcus’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2011
10-2
Rating 688 (93rd)
#2 · 2015
10-2
Rating 685 (92nd)
#3 · 2010
8-3
Rating 671 (90th)
#4 · 2009
7-3
Rating 670 (90th)
#5 · 2020
9-1
Rating 661 (89th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 5-5 1696 28.7 28.0 +0.7 1588 +3.4 −1.7 +5.2 1629 −1.28 +0.59 −1.86 558(65th)
2024 6-4 1718 30.8 27.9 +2.9 1731 +4.8 −6.9 +11.7 1793 −0.22 +1.14 −1.35 583(73rd)
2023 4-7 1520 28.5 33.5 −4.9 1764 +4.8 −0.3 +5.2 1630 −2.44 +0.63 −3.08 550(62nd)
2022 6-5 1847 24.7 25.1 −0.4 1846 +2.6 −11.1 +13.6 1841 +0.21 +1.36 −1.14 609(80th)
2021 8-3 2072 32.8 21.5 +11.3 1665 +7.8 −12.0 +19.9 1997 +1.03 +2.63 −1.60 634(85th)
2020 9-1 2054 46.2 22.7 +23.5 1652 +19.7 −10.1 +29.8 2246 +2.79 +3.23 −0.44 661(89th)
2019 11-2 1925 35.5 21.5 +14.1 1522 +8.1 −7.2 +15.2 1881 +1.99 +2.97 −0.97 615(81st)
2018 5-5 1561 26.5 24.8 +1.7 1480 −1.3 −2.9 +1.6 1539 −2.00 +0.60 −2.60 528(55th)
2017 4-6 1571 18.7 21.8 −3.1 1853 −2.0 −12.3 +10.3 1756 −1.29 +1.70 −2.99 572(69th)
2016 5-5 1787 33.4 35.0 −1.6 1857 +10.9 −0.9 +11.8 1795 −0.47 +1.87 −2.34 596(76th)
2015 10-2 2121 33.5 21.8 +11.7 1870 +11.4 −14.6 +26.0 2149 +3.90 +4.08 −0.17 685(92nd)
2014 5-5 1699 24.0 24.9 −0.9 1879 +1.3 −11.9 +13.2 1831 −0.27 +1.15 −1.42 595(76th)
2013 2-9 1527 14.5 26.4 −11.9 1886 −4.7 −8.5 +3.9 1597 −3.12 +0.80 −3.92 551(62nd)
2012 4-7 1915 18.4 23.5 −5.2 1841 −0.9 −10.1 +9.3 1731 −1.42 +1.45 −2.87 600(77th)
2011 10-2 2144 37.6 22.2 +15.4 1787 +15.0 −12.0 +27.1 2177 +3.15 +3.50 −0.36 688(93rd)
2010 8-3 2061 36.5 25.0 +11.5 1857 +14.0 −11.2 +25.3 2131 +2.41 +3.48 −1.07 671(90th)
2009 7-3 2069 39.1 26.9 +12.2 1857 +15.5 −9.5 +25.0 2125 +1.73 +2.28 −0.56 670(90th)
2008 5-6 1901 27.9 23.5 +4.5 1879 +8.6 −10.4 +19.0 1975 +0.11 +1.89 −1.78 638(85th)
2007 9-3 1813 24.1 13.9 +10.2 1510 +0.2 −12.6 +12.8 1820 +0.48 +2.18 −1.69 608(80th)
2006 5-5 1403 24.8 23.5 +1.3 1523 −0.8 −3.0 +2.2 1554 −2.24 +0.87 −3.10 523(53rd)
2005 5-4 1590 22.9 20.9 +2.0 1642 +0.3 −7.8 +8.1 1702 −0.95 +0.79 −1.75 560(66th)
2004 3-7 1421 19.5 23.8 −4.3 1605 −4.6 −4.0 −0.6 1485 −4.24 +0.75 −4.99 518(52nd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.