← Back
CLASS 6A · District 7-6A

Plano Wildcats

Enrollment: 4,071 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4
Rank
#133
was #134
Record
2-4
2-1 district
Elo
1451
#133 of 249
OVR Grade
75.9
#133 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
70.9
#168 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
77.5
#101 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1427
#136 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
Midland Lee (4-3) 1669
27% (-10) L 33-41 1346 +2.1 +8.2 — −0.64
2
Garland Sachse (6-0) 1785
30% (-8) L 3-45 830 −20.3 +6.5 — −0.71
3
@Mansfield (2-4) 1536
29% (-9) L 28-31 1611 −0.4 −4.8 — −0.76
4 77% (+11) W 21-9 1268 −15.2 −6.0 +0.03 —
5
@Richardson (1-5) 1192
59% (+4) W 38-19 1536 −0.9 −2.4 +0.09 —
7
#21Coppell (5-1) 2214
4% (-30) L 10-26 1973 −0.3 −19.3 — −0.18
8
@Plano East (4-2) 1678
28% (-9) — — — — — —
9 26% (-10) — — — — — —
10
@Richardson Berkner (2-4) 1624
33% (-7) — — — — — —
11
Plano West (2-4) 1342
61% (+4) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 7-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 21
Cowboys
87.4
2214
5-1 3-0 42.5 13.0 6.8-0.2 > 98% D1
2 86
Wildcats
79.6
1695
4-2 3-0 30.5 26.5 5.5-1.5 > 98% D2
3 88
Panthers
79.3
1678
4-2 2-1 32.2 18.7 4.3-2.7 87.2% D1
4 97
Rams
78.5
1624
2-4 1-2 27.0 27.0 3.9-3.1 76.1% D2
5 133
Wildcats
75.9
1451
2-4 2-1 22.2 28.5 3.5-3.5 33.9% —
6 157
Wolves
74.2
1342
2-4 1-2 20.5 24.5 2.4-4.6 3.4% —
7 206
Mustangs
69.1
1004
0-6 0-3 12.0 38.0 0.6-6.4 < 2% —
8 179
Eagles
72
1192
1-5 0-3 20.8 40.5 1-6 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Plano’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2007
13-2
Rating 751 (97th)
#2 · 2005
13-1
Rating 719 (95th)
#3 · 2008
10-2
Rating 706 (94th)
#4 · 2013
7-4
Rating 660 (89th)
#5 · 2010
7-4
Rating 649 (87th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 7-4 1586 15.8 25.1 −9.3 1716 −8.5 −7.6 −0.8 1479 −0.01 +1.24 −1.25 528(55th)
2024 5-5 1529 29.6 27.7 +1.9 1528 +1.2 −2.7 +4.0 1599 −1.94 +0.63 −2.57 540(59th)
2023 2-8 1161 18.8 36.0 −17.2 1607 −7.8 +6.3 −14.0 1150 −4.75 +0.27 −5.01 450(28th)
2022 4-7 1413 21.8 31.5 −9.7 1709 −2.2 −2.1 −0.1 1497 −2.83 +0.74 −3.57 512(49th)
2021 2-8 1272 24.3 32.0 −7.7 1708 −1.1 −2.1 +1.0 1524 −4.75 +0.23 −4.98 499(44th)
2020 1-6 1355 28.1 43.0 −14.9 1747 +4.4 +8.5 −4.1 1398 −2.85 +0.66 −3.52 —
2019 5-5 1467 32.1 38.1 −6.0 1689 +8.4 +6.7 +1.7 1543 −1.63 +0.75 −2.38 520(52nd)
2018 5-5 1782 32.2 27.9 +4.3 1661 +6.0 −5.1 +11.1 1778 −1.06 +1.21 −2.27 580(72nd)
2017 7-4 1741 28.1 26.4 +1.7 1789 +5.1 −7.7 +12.8 1820 +0.67 +2.52 −1.85 589(75th)
2016 4-6 1711 29.1 25.6 +3.5 1747 +4.2 −8.0 +12.2 1804 −1.80 +0.86 −2.66 580(72nd)
2015 4-6 1759 22.7 29.5 −6.8 1791 +0.8 −4.9 +5.7 1641 −1.32 +1.10 −2.43 567(68th)
2014 7-4 1993 26.5 21.9 +4.5 1878 +4.0 −16.6 +20.6 2016 +1.46 +2.43 −0.97 647(87th)
2013 7-4 2060 23.0 14.5 +8.5 1804 +2.3 −19.1 +21.3 2033 +1.33 +2.20 −0.87 660(89th)
2012 5-6 1795 27.1 24.2 +2.9 1841 +5.0 −11.2 +16.3 1907 −0.96 +0.92 −1.88 613(81st)
2011 4-6 1727 30.4 24.6 +5.8 1719 +5.4 −8.9 +14.3 1857 −1.66 +0.35 −2.01 590(75th)
2010 7-4 2051 29.6 20.5 +9.1 1768 +6.3 −15.1 +21.4 2036 +1.26 +2.24 −0.98 649(87th)
2009 5-7 1879 21.0 27.6 −6.6 1881 −1.0 −8.9 +7.9 1698 −1.17 +2.19 −3.36 606(79th)
2008 10-2 2269 38.9 26.8 +12.2 1882 +18.0 −8.3 +26.3 2157 +3.71 +3.88 −0.17 706(94th)
2007 13-2 2375 32.7 14.8 +17.9 1840 +13.8 −17.9 +31.8 2294 +5.75 +5.90 −0.15 751(97th)
2006 4-6 1631 16.9 17.7 −0.8 1767 −4.1 −13.8 +9.7 1743 −1.87 +1.29 −3.16 577(71st)
2005 13-1 2303 34.1 14.4 +19.7 1756 +14.3 −15.9 +30.2 2256 +4.83 +4.86 −0.03 719(95th)
2004 4-6 1636 23.9 22.5 +1.4 1563 −0.2 −4.4 +4.2 1605 −3.09 +0.55 −3.64 554(63rd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.