← Back
CLASS 6A · District 7-6A

Plano East Panthers

Enrollment: 4,857 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 2
Rank
#88
was #88
Record
4-2
2-1 district
Elo
1678
#88 of 249
OVR Grade
79.3
#88 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
75
#122 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
81.8
#62 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1700
#90 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
@Mesquite Horn (0-6) 1116
26% (-10) W 55-21 1775 +0.8 −10.2 +0.26 —
2 49% (0) W 48-15 2309 +21.8 −10.5 +0.23 —
3 40% (-4) L 13-14 1602 −10.2 −14.3 — −0.57
4 62% (+5) L 14-21 1482 −11.3 −10.5 — −0.78
5
@Plano West (2-4) 1342
53% (+1) W 24-6 1871 −1.2 −16.0 +0.21 —
7
Richardson (1-5) 1192
87% (+18) W 39-35 1161 +0.1 +13.6 +0.06 —
8
Plano (2-4) 1451
72% (+9) — — — — — —
9
@Richardson Berkner (2-4) 1624
56% (+2) — — — — — —
10 94% (+27) — — — — — —
11
@#21Coppell (5-1) 2214
10% (-21) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 7-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 21
Cowboys
87.4
2214
5-1 3-0 42.5 13.0 6.8-0.2 > 98% D1
2 86
Wildcats
79.6
1695
4-2 3-0 30.5 26.5 5.5-1.5 > 98% D2
3 88
Panthers
79.3
1678
4-2 2-1 32.2 18.7 4.3-2.7 87.2% D1
4 97
Rams
78.5
1624
2-4 1-2 27.0 27.0 3.9-3.1 76.1% D2
5 133
Wildcats
75.9
1451
2-4 2-1 22.2 28.5 3.5-3.5 33.9% —
6 157
Wolves
74.2
1342
2-4 1-2 20.5 24.5 2.4-4.6 3.4% —
7 206
Mustangs
69.1
1004
0-6 0-3 12.0 38.0 0.6-6.4 < 2% —
8 179
Eagles
72
1192
1-5 0-3 20.8 40.5 1-6 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Plano East’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2006
10-3
Rating 698 (94th)
#2 · 2009
7-4
Rating 644 (86th)
#3 · 2011
6-5
Rating 641 (86th)
#4 · 2016
6-5
Rating 631 (85th)
#5 · 2015
7-4
Rating 622 (83rd)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 2-8 1325 20.6 37.1 −16.5 1717 −3.5 +2.6 −6.1 1347 −4.54 +0.27 −4.80 487(39th)
2024 6-4 1558 28.5 27.6 +0.9 1535 +0.1 −3.0 +3.2 1579 −1.09 +0.76 −1.85 540(59th)
2023 6-5 1620 27.5 27.2 +0.4 1513 −0.1 −0.8 +0.6 1516 −1.46 +0.98 −2.44 540(59th)
2022 3-7 1163 25.2 37.9 −12.7 1594 +0.1 +8.4 −8.3 1292 −4.05 +0.50 −4.55 462(31st)
2021 2-8 1240 24.4 34.3 −9.9 1775 0.0 −1.2 +1.2 1531 −3.82 +0.23 −4.05 502(45th)
2020 0-9 1152 24.4 46.3 −21.9 1886 +0.4 +7.4 −7.0 1325 −4.57 0.00 −4.57 473(34th)
2019 1-9 1327 18.9 32.8 −13.9 1734 −4.1 +0.4 −4.4 1389 −5.14 +0.13 −5.28 488(40th)
2018 8-3 1758 37.2 28.1 +9.1 1655 +11.1 −4.4 +15.5 1888 +0.76 +1.94 −1.18 592(76th)
2017 3-7 1553 32.4 43.4 −11.0 1921 +11.1 +6.0 +5.1 1628 −2.07 +0.93 −3.00 559(65th)
2016 6-5 1814 40.7 30.4 +10.4 1837 +17.2 −5.1 +22.3 2057 −0.74 +1.48 −2.22 631(85th)
2015 7-4 1895 31.3 29.0 +2.3 1848 +10.8 −6.3 +17.1 1927 +1.62 +2.51 −0.89 622(83rd)
2014 1-9 1389 18.9 33.3 −14.4 1847 −4.7 −4.0 −0.7 1482 −4.25 +0.12 −4.37 518(51st)
2013 5-5 1643 23.9 28.5 −4.6 1763 +2.8 −4.6 +7.3 1683 −0.92 +1.24 −2.16 560(66th)
2012 5-4 1661 29.9 32.4 −2.6 1805 +5.9 −2.4 +8.3 1706 −0.15 +1.95 −2.10 571(69th)
2011 6-5 1985 34.5 28.9 +5.6 1816 +12.6 −7.0 +19.6 1990 +0.60 +2.11 −1.51 641(86th)
2010 5-5 1890 31.3 28.9 +2.4 1767 +6.6 −7.9 +14.5 1863 +0.06 +1.46 −1.39 611(80th)
2009 7-4 2000 27.9 24.2 +3.7 1882 +5.8 −12.6 +18.4 1960 +2.01 +3.07 −1.06 644(86th)
2008 1-9 1480 18.1 42.3 −24.2 1991 −0.2 +3.6 −3.9 1404 −3.21 +0.10 −3.31 530(55th)
2007 6-4 1797 35.7 26.7 +9.0 1701 +13.4 −2.9 +16.4 1910 +0.08 +2.01 −1.93 606(79th)
2006 10-3 2131 29.6 14.5 +15.2 1833 +10.8 −17.7 +28.5 2213 +3.05 +3.97 −0.92 698(94th)
2005 6-6 1755 19.2 20.4 −1.2 1812 +0.4 −11.7 +12.2 1804 −0.49 +1.46 −1.95 600(78th)
2004 5-6 1631 23.1 30.1 −7.0 1776 +3.1 −0.5 +3.6 1590 −1.31 +1.16 −2.47 557(64th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.