← Back

CLASS 6A · District 27-6A

New Braunfels Canyon Cougars

Enrollment: 2,568 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4

Rank

#156

was #156

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1354

#156 of 249

OVR Grade

74.4

#156 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@San Antonio Madison (0-0) 1302	55% (+2)	—	—	—	—
2	New Braunfels	19% (-14)	—	—	—	—
3	@San Antonio Brandeis (0-0) 1625	24% (-11)	—	—	—	—
4	@San Antonio East Central (0-0) 1378	47% (-1)	—	—	—	—
5	San Marcos (0-0) 1583	28% (-9)	—	—	—	—
7	Schertz Clemens (0-0) 1372	48% (-1)	—	—	—	—
8	@Converse Wagner (0-0) 1169	68% (+7)	—	—	—	—
9	San Antonio Pieper (0-0) 1661	22% (-12)	—	—	—	—
10	@#17Cibolo Steele (0-0) 2273	2% (-37)	—	—	—	—
11	Converse Judson (0-0) 1481	37% (-5)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 27-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		17	Cibolo Steele (2) Knights	88.3 2273	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.8-0.2	> 98%	D1
2		83	San Antonio Pieper (8) Warriors	79 1661	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.6-2.5	87.7%	D2
3		97	San Marcos (6) Rattlers	77.9 1583	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-3	76.4%	D2
4		118	Converse Judson (5) Rockets	76.3 1481	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.4-3.6	54.5%	D1
5		148	San Antonio East Central (1) Hornets	74.8 1378	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.7-4.3	28.8%	—
6		151	Schertz Clemens (3) Buffaloes	74.7 1372	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.7-4.3	26.5%	—
7		156	New Braunfels Canyon (4) Cougars	74.4 1354	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.5-4.5	21.6%	—
8		185	Converse Wagner (7) Thunderbirds	71.6 1169	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.4-5.6	4.4%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how New Braunfels Canyon’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2013

7-4

Rating 592 (76th)

#2 · 2024

8-5

Rating 553 (63rd)

#3 · 2017

2-8

Rating 531 (55th)

#4 · 2012

3-7

Rating 526 (54th)

#5 · 2015

2-8

Rating 512 (49th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	5-6	1277	20.5	28.4	−7.8	1537	−5.5	+0.7	−6.2	1344	−3.40	+0.44	−3.85	482(37th)
2024	8-5	1715	33.2	29.2	+3.9	1478	+3.6	+1.0	+2.6	1566	−1.76	+1.40	−3.16	553(63rd)
2023	1-0	1501	32.0	28.0	+4.0	1683	+5.3	−6.6	+11.9	1798	+0.39	+0.39	0.00	—
2022	1-0	1361	35.0	32.0	+3.0	1959	+13.9	−3.8	+17.7	1942	+0.51	+0.51	0.00	—
2021	1-2	1216	26.3	33.3	−7.0	1800	+4.8	+0.7	+4.1	1603	−1.33	+0.13	−1.46	—
2019	0-10	1078	19.1	40.5	−21.4	1675	−5.2	+8.0	−13.2	1171	−5.71	0.00	−5.71	436(23rd)
2018	4-6	1487	29.5	37.3	−7.8	1619	+4.3	+7.1	−2.8	1429	−2.03	+0.32	−2.35	507(47th)
2017	2-8	1380	18.1	32.7	−14.6	1896	−2.5	−4.3	+1.8	1546	−2.94	+0.21	−3.16	531(55th)
2016	2-8	1344	15.4	30.5	−15.1	1810	−6.0	−5.7	−0.3	1494	−3.36	+0.25	−3.61	512(49th)
2015	2-8	1252	23.5	31.3	−7.8	1796	−0.2	−3.1	+2.9	1573	−4.11	+0.16	−4.27	512(49th)
2014	3-7	1433	14.5	26.7	−12.2	1628	−7.1	−0.9	−6.3	1344	−3.58	+0.59	−4.17	491(41st)
2013	7-4	1808	26.4	20.3	+6.1	1684	+0.9	−12.7	+13.6	1841	+0.56	+1.43	−0.87	592(76th)
2012	3-7	1529	25.1	30.0	−4.9	1669	+0.7	−0.5	+1.2	1531	−3.21	+0.31	−3.51	526(54th)
2011	4-0	1629	22.8	6.2	+16.5	1369	−3.9	−16.8	+12.9	1822	+0.71	+0.71	0.00	—
2010	3-1	1477	32.5	19.0	+13.5	1354	+3.8	−4.1	+8.0	1699	−0.12	+0.18	−0.30	—
2009	0-1	1274	2.0	69.0	−67.0	2078	−10.5	+34.2	−44.7	382	−0.68	0.00	−0.68	—
2008	0-1	1312	0.0	35.0	−35.0	1651	−12.4	+9.9	−22.3	943	−0.84	0.00	−0.84	—
2007	0-1	1426	21.0	28.0	−7.0	1454	−3.6	+1.4	−5.0	1374	−0.80	0.00	−0.80	—
2006	1-0	1494	23.0	21.0	+2.0	1685	+1.9	−7.7	+9.6	1739	+0.27	+0.27	0.00	—
2005	1-0	1434	27.0	10.0	+17.0	1364	+5.8	−12.7	+18.6	1964	+0.17	+0.17	0.00	—
2004	1-0	1272	7.0	0.0	+7.0	1433	−14.0	−20.2	+6.2	1654	+0.04	+0.04	0.00	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.