← Back
CLASS 6A · District 29-6A

San Antonio O’Connor Panthers

Enrollment: 2,456 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 7
Rank
#185
was #184
Record
3-3
2-2 district
Elo
1131
#185 of 249
OVR Grade
71
#185 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
70.6
#173 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
72.6
#150 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1272
#160 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
@San Antonio Brandeis (3-3) 1461
 7% (-25) L 28-35 1215 +0.3 +11.7 — −0.72
2
Converse Wagner (1-4) 1053
 33% (-7) W 21-14 1265 −15.4 −6.0 +0.05 —
4
San Antonio Holmes (1-5) 523
 89% (+20) W 36-20 995 −6.6 +13.6 +0.01 —
5
@#41San Antonio Brennan (5-1) 2028
 2% (-36) L 0-44 1273 −11.1 −2.1 — −0.33
6
San Antonio Stevens (2-5) 800
 80% (+13) W 44-0 1663 +0.9 −5.7 +0.01 —
7
@San Antonio Warren (4-3) 1317
 38% (-5) L 28-31 1219 −5.7 +5.6 — −0.92
8
San Antonio Marshall (1-5) 693
 86% (+18) — — — — — —
9
@San Antonio Harlan (5-1) 1927
 3% (-32) — — — — — —
10
San Antonio Taft (4-3) 1192
 44% (-2) — — — — — —
11
@San Antonio Sotomayor (5-2) 1586
 13% (-18) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 29-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 41
Bears
84.6
2028
 5-1 4-0 50.5 7.0 7.6-0.4 > 98% D1
2 53
Hawks
83
1927
 5-1 4-0 41.5 13.8 7.2-0.8 > 98% D1
3 102
Wildcats
77.9
1586
 5-2 4-1 26.7 17.1 5.9-2.1 > 98% D2
4 162
Warriors
73.8
1317
 4-3 3-2 29.4 30.4 4.9-3.1 97.9% D2
5 178
Raiders
72
1192
 4-3 2-3 24.9 29.4 3.7-4.3 2.1% —
6 185
Panthers
71
1131
 3-3 2-2 26.2 24.0 3.5-4.5 < 2% —
7 222
Falcons
66
800
 2-5 1-4 10.9 36.1 1.7-6.3 < 2% —
8 232
Rams
64.4
693
 1-5 0-4 12.8 45.2 1.2-6.8 < 2% —
9 241
Huskies
61.9
523
 1-5 0-4 13.7 33.7 0.4-7.6 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how San Antonio O’Connor’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2017
13-1
Rating 717 (95th)
#2 · 2016
8-2
Rating 658 (89th)
#3 · 2018
10-1
Rating 646 (87th)
#4 · 2012
12-3
Rating 645 (87th)
#5 · 2019
8-3
Rating 624 (83rd)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 4-7 1044 26.5 35.5 −9.0 1320 −6.5 +10.3 −16.8 1080 −4.64 +0.06 −4.69 426(21st)
2024 4-6 1056 21.0 32.3 −11.3 1245 −11.6 +9.4 −21.0 976 −4.70 +0.09 −4.79 414(18th)
2023 3-7 1105 23.7 34.0 −10.3 1325 −5.9 +10.0 −15.9 1102 −5.45 +0.05 −5.49 439(24th)
2022 4-6 1189 20.5 26.7 −6.2 1409 −9.0 +0.5 −9.5 1263 −3.72 +0.33 −4.05 460(30th)
2021 3-7 1517 21.8 32.4 −10.6 1529 −5.7 +2.5 −8.2 1294 −3.85 +0.65 −4.50 490(40th)
2020 1-3 1577 18.0 25.5 −7.5 1693 −5.8 −5.5 −0.3 1493 −2.28 +0.09 −2.36 —
2019 8-3 2043 33.3 17.9 +15.4 1536 +10.1 −6.5 +16.7 1916 +0.48 +1.53 −1.05 624(83rd)
2018 10-1 2201 29.5 14.9 +14.6 1556 +4.2 −12.2 +16.4 1910 +2.42 +2.81 −0.39 646(87th)
2017 13-1 2419 42.2 24.0 +18.2 1797 +18.9 −10.4 +29.3 2234 +5.38 +5.42 −0.04 717(95th)
2016 8-2 2136 36.8 19.3 +17.5 1706 +14.0 −11.0 +25.0 2124 +2.23 +2.49 −0.26 658(89th)
2015 8-4 1900 35.8 32.8 +3.0 1628 +10.3 +2.3 +7.9 1699 +1.02 +1.67 −0.64 580(72nd)
2014 8-3 1903 30.4 18.9 +11.5 1595 +4.4 −10.4 +14.9 1872 +1.31 +1.71 −0.40 615(81st)
2013 8-4 1736 34.1 23.9 +10.2 1489 +4.9 −4.0 +9.0 1724 −1.07 +0.71 −1.78 579(71st)
2012 12-3 2024 36.0 23.1 +12.9 1571 +9.8 −6.8 +16.6 1916 +2.23 +2.91 −0.68 645(87th)
2011 7-5 1528 25.8 23.4 +2.3 1479 0.0 −1.5 +1.5 1539 −1.91 +1.29 −3.20 541(59th)
2010 5-6 1521 25.5 31.4 −5.8 1446 −1.1 +5.8 −6.9 1327 −3.00 +0.48 −3.48 513(49th)
2009 5-6 1328 22.5 27.5 −5.0 1410 −4.2 +4.0 −8.2 1295 −3.80 +0.22 −4.02 479(36th)
2008 8-4 1799 32.2 23.3 +8.8 1465 +4.3 −2.8 +7.2 1679 −0.71 +0.76 −1.47 583(73rd)
2007 9-3 1754 32.3 20.2 +12.1 1456 +7.5 −3.1 +10.6 1766 −0.32 +1.28 −1.60 588(74th)
2006 8-4 1630 29.6 21.2 +8.4 1474 +4.1 −3.6 +7.7 1691 −0.65 +1.58 −2.23 561(66th)
2005 8-4 1651 29.7 17.2 +12.5 1442 +4.5 −6.1 +10.6 1766 −1.84 +0.90 −2.74 587(74th)
2004 10-2 1809 33.9 16.3 +17.6 1373 +7.2 −7.2 +14.4 1860 +0.53 +1.23 −0.70 613(81st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.