← Back

CLASS 6A · District 27-6A

Converse Wagner Thunderbirds

Enrollment: 2,295 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 7

Rank

#185

was #185

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1169

#185 of 249

OVR Grade

71.6

#185 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Austin High (0-0) 1099	57% (+3)	—	—	—	—
2	@San Antonio O'Connor (0-0) 1010	66% (+6)	—	—	—	—
3	Del Rio (0-0) 733	86% (+17)	—	—	—	—
4	@#17Cibolo Steele (0-0) 2273	< 2% (-44)	—	—	—	—
5	Converse Judson (0-0) 1481	21% (-12)	—	—	—	—
7	@San Antonio East Central (0-0) 1378	29% (-8)	—	—	—	—
8	New Braunfels Canyon (0-0) 1354	32% (-7)	—	—	—	—
9	@Schertz Clemens (0-0) 1372	30% (-8)	—	—	—	—
10	@San Marcos (0-0) 1583	15% (-17)	—	—	—	—
11	San Antonio Pieper (0-0) 1661	11% (-20)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 27-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		17	Cibolo Steele (2) Knights	88.3 2273	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.8-0.2	> 98%	D1
2		83	San Antonio Pieper (8) Warriors	79 1661	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.6-2.5	87.7%	D2
3		97	San Marcos (6) Rattlers	77.9 1583	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-3	76.4%	D2
4		118	Converse Judson (5) Rockets	76.3 1481	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.4-3.6	54.5%	D1
5		148	San Antonio East Central (1) Hornets	74.8 1378	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.7-4.3	28.8%	—
6		151	Schertz Clemens (3) Buffaloes	74.7 1372	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.7-4.3	26.5%	—
7		156	New Braunfels Canyon (4) Cougars	74.4 1354	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.5-4.5	21.6%	—
8		185	Converse Wagner (7) Thunderbirds	71.6 1169	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.4-5.6	4.4%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Converse Wagner’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2009

8-3

Rating 601 (78th)

#2 · 2011

7-4

Rating 596 (76th)

#3 · 2010

7-7

Rating 591 (75th)

#4 · 2021

4-6

Rating 590 (75th)

#5 · 2020

4-4

Rating 582 (72nd)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	0-2	1282	6.5	53.5	−47.0	1999	−7.6	+15.4	−23.0	925	−1.08	0.00	−1.08	—
2024	1-1	1478	23.0	26.0	−3.0	1312	−12.0	+0.3	−12.3	1193	−0.42	+0.02	−0.45	—
2023	1-1	1440	38.0	26.0	+12.0	1505	+7.1	−4.5	+11.6	1790	−0.35	+0.03	−0.37	—
2022	1-1	1521	24.5	39.0	−14.5	1838	+3.3	−0.2	+3.5	1587	−0.16	+0.14	−0.30	—
2021	4-6	1723	32.7	21.4	+11.3	1641	+9.6	−6.6	+16.2	1904	−1.78	+0.83	−2.60	590(75th)
2020	4-4	1596	38.6	35.5	+3.1	1827	+17.6	+2.3	+15.3	1884	+0.16	+1.54	−1.37	582(72nd)
2019	0-1	1416	14.0	52.0	−38.0	2380	−0.8	+0.3	−1.1	1471	−0.07	0.00	−0.07	—
2018	1-0	1414	60.0	21.0	+39.0	1169	+30.2	+2.1	+28.1	2202	+0.07	+0.07	0.00	—
2017	4-6	1305	23.0	33.5	−10.5	1662	−0.2	+3.1	−3.3	1416	−1.66	+0.47	−2.13	489(40th)
2016	4-6	1333	25.6	30.3	−4.7	1693	+1.1	−1.7	+2.8	1571	−2.12	+0.34	−2.46	512(49th)
2015	2-8	1335	34.0	45.8	−11.8	1807	+11.0	+10.6	+0.5	1511	−3.17	+0.15	−3.33	512(49th)
2014	3-7	1295	17.8	26.7	−8.9	1649	−4.3	−1.7	−2.5	1437	−3.63	+0.24	−3.86	491(41st)
2013	0-9	1251	16.7	39.8	−23.1	1857	−7.0	+1.4	−8.4	1291	−5.32	0.00	−5.32	482(37th)
2012	6-5	1827	23.0	21.4	+1.6	1633	−0.9	−10.2	+9.3	1732	−0.57	+1.32	−1.90	580(72nd)
2011	7-4	1882	24.2	20.8	+3.4	1704	+2.5	−9.5	+11.9	1798	+0.67	+2.65	−1.98	596(76th)
2010	7-7	1774	22.9	22.1	+0.7	1704	+0.1	−8.1	+8.2	1705	−1.36	+1.75	−3.11	591(75th)
2009	8-3	1754	32.5	14.3	+18.2	1389	+3.9	−9.3	+13.3	1832	+0.14	+1.46	−1.33	601(78th)
2008	6-5	1546	31.0	26.0	+5.0	1432	+3.9	+2.1	+1.8	1544	−2.03	+0.36	−2.40	533(56th)
2007	4-6	1506	24.4	30.6	−6.2	1715	+1.4	−0.6	+2.1	1552	−2.36	+0.95	−3.31	532(56th)
2006	1-9	1176	15.2	35.0	−19.8	1687	−6.5	+5.5	−12.0	1199	−4.87	+0.02	−4.89	455(29th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.