← Back
CLASS 6A · District 29-6A

San Antonio Harlan Hawks

Enrollment: 3,016 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 1
Rank
#35
was #35
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1967
#35 of 249
OVR Grade
83.6
#35 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1 92% (+24)
2
@#26Dripping Springs (0-0) 2147
32% (-7)
3 > 98% (+42)
4 98% (+36)
5 > 98% (+52)
7
San Antonio Taft (0-0) 1164
97% (+32)
8 90% (+21)
9 > 98% (+38)
10 > 98% (+54)
11
#38San Antonio Brennan (0-0) 1958
51% (+0)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 29-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 35
Hawks
83.6
1967
0-0 0-0 7.3-0.7 > 98% D1
2 38
Bears
83.5
1958
0-0 0-0 7.3-0.7 > 98% D1
3 139
Wildcats
75.6
1431
0-0 0-0 5.4-2.5 92.3% D2
4 187
Raiders
71.5
1164
0-0 0-0 4.1-3.9 54% D2
5 201
Warriors
69.9
1057
0-0 0-0 3.5-4.5 26%
6 207
Panthers
69.2
1010
0-0 0-0 3.2-4.8 17.2%
7 217
Falcons
67.9
925
0-0 0-0 2.7-5.3 9.4%
8 239
Rams
64.1
670
0-0 0-0 1.3-6.7 < 2%
9 242
Huskies
63.5
629
0-0 0-0 1.1-6.9 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how San Antonio Harlan’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2025
11-1
Rating 637 (85th)
#2 · 2024
12-2
Rating 615 (81st)
#3 · 2023
12-1
Rating 612 (80th)
#4 · 2022
10-3
Rating 588 (75th)
#5 · 2021
6-5
Rating 516 (50th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 11-1 1984 48.8 19.2 +29.6 1237 +14.8 −5.0 +19.8 1996 +1.26 +1.39 −0.13 637(85th)
2024 12-2 1934 41.1 25.0 +16.1 1377 +9.8 −0.9 +10.8 1770 +1.11 +1.72 −0.61 615(81st)
2023 12-1 1857 39.4 20.2 +19.2 1310 +9.1 −3.2 +12.3 1808 +1.35 +1.46 −0.11 612(80th)
2022 10-3 1759 38.2 21.1 +17.1 1312 +8.3 −2.0 +10.3 1758 −0.18 +0.98 −1.16 588(75th)
2021 6-5 1450 27.4 24.9 +2.5 1462 −1.1 −2.4 +1.3 1533 −2.64 +0.56 −3.20 516(50th)
2020 5-3 1463 27.2 25.8 +1.5 1492 +0.8 −0.9 +1.7 1543 −0.98 +0.46 −1.44 514(50th)
2019 3-0 1355 32.7 11.7 +21.0 1126 −1.1 −6.2 +5.1 1628 +0.09 +0.09 0.00
2018 2-1 1211 21.7 18.3 +3.3 984 −12.1 +3.0 −15.0 1124 −0.92 +0.04 −0.96
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.