| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @Clear Falls (3-3) 1637 |
92% (+24) | W 49-3 | 2703 | +19.3 | −28.9 | +0.33 | — |
| 2 | Katy Paetow (2-4) 1511 |
97% (+32) | W 38-14 | 2068 | +12.0 | −10.8 | +0.19 | — |
| 3 | @Pasadena Dobie (2-4) 1248 |
> 98% (+39) | W 49-10 | 2177 | +17.3 | −9.8 | +0.11 | — |
| 4 | Pearland Dawson (3-4) 1551 |
97% (+34) | W 48-14 | 2232 | +17.2 | −12.0 | +0.17 | — |
| 5 | Pasadena Memorial (3-4) 1123 |
> 98% (+49) | W 49-0 | 2276 | +8.9 | −22.2 | +0.04 | — |
| 6 | #28Manvel (5-1) 2101 |
64% (+6) | W 41-21 | 2820 | +30.0 | −22.8 | +0.79 | — |
| 7 | @Alvin (0-6) 678 |
> 98% (+68) | W 59-7 | 2054 | +12.3 | −9.9 | +0.01 | — |
| 9 | Pasadena Sam Rayburn (1-6) 637 |
> 98% (+70) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | 68% (+7) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 11 | Brazoswood (3-3) 1292 |
> 98% (+44) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#12
was #11
Record
7-0
5-0 district
Elo
2385
#12 of 249
OVR Grade
90
#12 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
86.8
#28 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
89.1
#22 of 249 in 6A
Perf
2333
#21 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 19-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Pearland’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2010
16-0
Rating 800 (99th)
#2 · 2025
11-1
Rating 720 (95th)
#3 · 2013
14-2
Rating 716 (95th)
#4 · 2015
11-1
Rating 706 (94th)
#5 · 2008
12-1
Rating 688 (93rd)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.