← Back

CLASS 6A · District 4-6A

Keller Indians

Enrollment: 2,915 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 3

Rank

#98

was #98

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1583

#98 of 249

OVR Grade

77.9

#98 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@Burleson	88% (+19)	—	—	—	—
2	Midland (0-0) 1378	70% (+8)	—	—	—	—
3	McKinney Boyd (0-0) 1305	76% (+11)	—	—	—	—
4	@Keller Timber Creek (0-0) 1477	61% (+4)	—	—	—	—
5	@Fort Worth Boswell (0-0) 1376	70% (+8)	—	—	—	—
7	#30Byron Nelson (0-0) 2077	11% (-20)	—	—	—	—
8	@#9Southlake Carroll (0-0) 2444	3% (-34)	—	—	—	—
9	@Justin Northwest (0-0) 1333	74% (+10)	—	—	—	—
10	Keller Central (0-0) 1456	63% (+5)	—	—	—	—
11	Northwest Eaton (0-0) 1456	63% (+5)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 4-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		9	Southlake Carroll (6) Dragons	90.9 2444	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.7-0.3	> 98%	D2
2		30	Byron Nelson (2) Bobcats	85.3 2077	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.8-1.2	> 98%	D1
3		98	Keller (3) Indians	77.9 1583	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.5-3.5	66.1%	D1
4		123	Keller Timber Creek (4) Falcons	76.3 1477	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.8-4.2	39%	D2
5		130	Keller Central (8) Chargers	75.9 1456	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.6-4.4	32.7%	—
6		130	Northwest Eaton (1) Eagles	75.9 1456	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.6-4.4	31.7%	—
7		150	Fort Worth Boswell (7) Pioneers	74.7 1376	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.1-4.9	17.9%	—
8		158	Justin Northwest (5) Texans	74.1 1333	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.9-5.1	12.8%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Keller’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2018

8-3

Rating 607 (79th)

#2 · 2004

8-3

Rating 606 (79th)

#3 · 2022

10-3

Rating 604 (78th)

#4 · 2024

5-5

Rating 586 (74th)

#5 · 2019

7-4

Rating 583 (73rd)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	5-6	1634	33.0	38.7	−5.7	1774	+9.7	+4.2	+5.5	1637	−1.35	+0.86	−2.21	558(65th)
2024	5-5	1822	22.9	22.8	+0.1	1731	−2.1	−11.7	+9.6	1741	−0.80	+0.90	−1.70	586(74th)
2023	7-4	1702	31.1	27.5	+3.5	1531	+1.5	−4.8	+6.3	1658	−0.70	+0.61	−1.31	567(68th)
2022	10-3	1917	31.5	23.4	+8.1	1614	+3.7	−9.6	+13.2	1831	+1.58	+1.97	−0.39	604(78th)
2021	6-5	1591	31.0	24.6	+6.4	1666	+5.1	−8.6	+13.7	1842	−1.19	+1.11	−2.30	570(69th)
2020	3-6	1565	27.3	26.6	+0.8	1601	+0.6	−3.4	+4.0	1601	−3.80	+0.32	−4.12	531(56th)
2019	7-4	1858	23.8	20.2	+3.6	1620	+0.8	−9.4	+10.2	1754	−0.56	+1.22	−1.78	583(73rd)
2018	8-3	1827	35.3	21.3	+14.0	1598	+11.7	−6.1	+17.8	1945	+0.82	+2.03	−1.21	607(79th)
2017	5-6	1498	26.2	30.1	−3.9	1530	−0.1	+1.0	−1.1	1472	−2.84	+0.94	−3.79	514(49th)
2016	1-9	1062	20.3	36.1	−15.8	1536	−8.9	+4.7	−13.6	1160	−6.86	+0.04	−6.90	434(23rd)
2015	6-4	1654	34.3	32.9	+1.4	1696	+8.5	+0.1	+8.4	1710	−0.69	+1.26	−1.95	559(65th)
2014	4-6	1653	29.5	27.8	+1.7	1677	+2.8	−7.6	+10.5	1761	−2.02	+0.98	−3.00	567(68th)
2013	4-5	1468	22.2	25.2	−3.0	1654	−1.3	−4.8	+3.5	1588	−1.83	+1.08	−2.92	528(55th)
2012	3-7	1343	18.5	26.1	−7.6	1553	−6.3	−1.7	−4.5	1387	−4.05	+0.27	−4.32	490(41st)
2011	2-8	1143	23.5	28.6	−5.1	1709	+0.6	−0.9	+1.5	1538	−4.41	+0.06	−4.47	496(42nd)
2010	3-7	1204	22.2	32.0	−9.8	1593	−4.0	+2.9	−6.9	1327	−4.01	+0.11	−4.12	473(34th)
2009	6-5	1559	30.0	28.7	+1.3	1551	+3.4	+0.4	+3.0	1576	−2.07	+0.44	−2.51	537(58th)
2008	7-3	1577	28.2	22.0	+6.2	1543	+2.1	−5.1	+7.2	1680	−0.19	+0.88	−1.07	553(63rd)
2007	4-7	1249	21.6	28.3	−6.6	1652	−1.9	+0.8	−2.7	1432	−3.23	+0.47	−3.71	492(41st)
2006	3-7	1433	30.7	37.0	−6.3	1673	+7.1	+5.6	+1.5	1538	−3.61	+0.86	−4.47	523(53rd)
2005	3-7	1273	20.7	33.0	−12.3	1635	−5.7	+1.3	−7.0	1326	−4.20	+0.21	−4.41	482(37th)
2004	8-3	1739	35.3	22.2	+13.1	1607	+9.0	−7.9	+16.9	1922	−0.02	+1.25	−1.27	606(79th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.