← Back

CLASS 6A · District 19-6A

Brazoswood Buccaneers

Enrollment: 2,536 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 7

Rank

#189

was #189

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1154

#189 of 249

OVR Grade

71.4

#189 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Santa Fe	31% (-8)	—	—	—	—
2	@Galveston Ball	11% (-20)	—	—	—	—
3	Pasadena Sam Rayburn (0-0) 939	71% (+9)	—	—	—	—
4	@#28Alvin Shadow Creek (0-0) 2095	< 2% (-38)	—	—	—	—
6	Pasadena Dobie (0-0) 1430	24% (-11)	—	—	—	—
7	@Pearland Dawson (0-0) 1843	5% (-28)	—	—	—	—
8	Pasadena Memorial (0-0) 1052	61% (+4)	—	—	—	—
9	@#33Manvel (0-0) 1985	3% (-33)	—	—	—	—
10	Alvin (0-0) 976	68% (+7)	—	—	—	—
11	@#16Pearland (0-0) 2282	< 2% (-45)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 19-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		16	Pearland (2) Oilers	88.4 2282	0-0	0-0	—	—	7.3-0.7	> 98%	D1
2		28	Alvin Shadow Creek (6) Sharks	85.6 2095	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.6-1.4	> 98%	D2
3		33	Manvel (9) Mavericks	83.9 1985	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.1-1.9	96.9%	D2
4		56	Pearland Dawson (5) Eagles	81.8 1843	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.5-2.5	90.3%	D1
5		141	Pasadena Dobie (1) Longhorns	75.5 1430	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.7-4.3	12.4%	—
6		189	Brazoswood (7) Buccaneers	71.4 1154	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.4-5.6	< 2%	—
7		202	Pasadena Memorial (3) Mavericks	69.8 1052	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.8-6.2	< 2%	—
8		208	Alvin (4) Yellowjackets	68.7 976	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.5-6.5	< 2%	—
9		214	Pasadena Sam Rayburn (8) Texans	68.1 939	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.3-6.7	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Brazoswood’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2009

10-4

Rating 628 (84th)

#2 · 2006

11-2

Rating 606 (79th)

#3 · 2007

9-2

Rating 582 (72nd)

#4 · 2010

4-6

Rating 551 (62nd)

#5 · 2022

7-4

Rating 533 (56th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	4-6	1269	24.3	37.0	−12.7	1513	−6.7	+7.0	−13.7	1158	−2.88	+0.40	−3.27	456(30th)
2024	2-8	1239	24.7	45.3	−20.6	1524	−4.2	+15.6	−19.8	1005	−4.90	+0.18	−5.08	435(23rd)
2023	3-7	1032	24.2	31.9	−7.7	1323	−4.8	+9.2	−14.0	1149	−4.99	+0.04	−5.03	438(24th)
2022	7-4	1535	40.7	33.5	+7.2	1375	+12.4	+9.4	+3.0	1576	−0.65	+0.49	−1.14	533(56th)
2021	4-6	1074	21.7	29.7	−8.0	1461	−7.6	+0.9	−8.5	1288	−3.26	+0.29	−3.55	449(27th)
2020	1-8	775	10.8	34.4	−23.7	1474	−16.2	+8.6	−24.8	880	−5.62	+0.11	−5.74	364(9th)
2019	0-10	807	4.9	43.9	−39.0	1606	−20.0	+14.7	−34.7	634	−7.24	0.00	−7.24	339(6th)
2018	1-9	1065	13.4	37.6	−24.2	1556	−13.7	+8.8	−22.5	937	−6.00	+0.06	−6.06	404(16th)
2017	2-6	1129	17.6	32.4	−14.8	1503	−8.6	+6.2	−14.8	1131	−4.10	+0.11	−4.21	436(23rd)
2016	4-6	1285	16.5	23.8	−7.3	1462	−11.7	−3.3	−8.4	1289	−3.31	+0.30	−3.62	471(33rd)
2015	4-6	1273	26.0	31.8	−5.8	1565	−2.8	+1.3	−4.1	1397	−2.88	+0.71	−3.59	483(38th)
2014	4-6	1472	31.9	38.3	−6.4	1573	+5.9	+8.6	−2.7	1431	−3.33	+0.57	−3.90	507(47th)
2013	3-7	1230	27.8	32.5	−4.7	1464	−1.1	+6.1	−7.2	1319	−4.46	+0.34	−4.81	471(34th)
2012	6-5	1444	28.2	28.9	−0.7	1486	−0.8	+1.3	−2.1	1448	−2.41	+0.76	−3.16	508(47th)
2011	4-6	1449	22.5	27.9	−5.4	1553	−4.4	−0.6	−3.9	1403	−3.19	+0.56	−3.76	505(46th)
2010	4-6	1490	28.8	25.9	+2.9	1662	+3.6	−5.2	+8.8	1720	−3.15	+0.39	−3.54	551(62nd)
2009	10-4	1956	30.1	19.2	+10.9	1594	+5.5	−9.2	+14.7	1867	+0.11	+2.85	−2.75	628(84th)
2008	3-6	1474	21.3	24.0	−2.7	1480	−2.7	+0.1	−2.8	1430	−4.28	+0.25	−4.53	511(48th)
2007	9-2	1811	26.5	17.4	+9.2	1430	+2.2	−5.3	+7.5	1688	+0.22	+1.20	−0.98	582(72nd)
2006	11-2	1887	25.2	15.9	+9.2	1462	0.0	−8.4	+8.4	1710	+1.40	+2.45	−1.05	606(79th)
2005	4-6	1229	16.7	20.9	−4.2	1396	−8.2	+0.5	−8.6	1284	−3.73	+0.61	−4.34	473(34th)
2004	3-7	1305	13.4	22.0	−8.6	1480	−12.0	−1.8	−10.2	1245	−4.99	+0.21	−5.20	476(35th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.