← Back
CLASS 6A · District 19-6A

Pearland Dawson Eagles

Enrollment: 2,640 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 5
Rank
#56
was #56
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1843
#56 of 249
OVR Grade
81.8
#56 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
Deer Park (0-0) 1800
54% (+2)
2
@Fort Bend Elkins (0-0) 1292
91% (+22)
3
Alvin (0-0) 976
97% (+35)
4
@#16Pearland (0-0) 2282
14% (-18)
5 98% (+36)
6
@#28Alvin Shadow Creek (0-0) 2095
26% (-10)
7
Brazoswood (0-0) 1154
95% (+28)
8
@Pasadena Dobie (0-0) 1430
85% (+17)
10 96% (+32)
11
@#33Manvel (0-0) 1985
36% (-6)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 19-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 16
Oilers
88.4
2282
0-0 0-0 7.3-0.7 > 98% D1
2 28
Sharks
85.6
2095
0-0 0-0 6.6-1.4 > 98% D2
3 33
Mavericks
83.9
1985
0-0 0-0 6.1-1.9 96.9% D2
4 56
Eagles
81.8
1843
0-0 0-0 5.5-2.5 90.3% D1
5 141
Longhorns
75.5
1430
0-0 0-0 3.7-4.3 12.4%
6 189
Buccaneers
71.4
1154
0-0 0-0 2.4-5.6 < 2%
7 202
Mavericks
69.8
1052
0-0 0-0 1.8-6.2 < 2%
8 208
Yellowjackets
68.7
976
0-0 0-0 1.5-6.5 < 2%
9 214
Texans
68.1
939
0-0 0-0 1.3-6.7 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Pearland Dawson’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2020
10-1
Rating 726 (96th)
#2 · 2019
10-2
Rating 651 (88th)
#3 · 2015
8-4
Rating 628 (84th)
#4 · 2021
8-4
Rating 608 (80th)
#5 · 2014
8-4
Rating 599 (77th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 7-4 1664 31.7 16.2 +15.5 1498 +2.7 −12.9 +15.6 1890 −0.14 +0.98 −1.12 596(77th)
2024 6-4 1487 39.1 35.6 +3.5 1468 +8.8 +7.3 +1.5 1537 −1.58 +0.39 −1.97 527(54th)
2023 6-5 1665 28.8 16.7 +12.1 1500 +3.3 −9.3 +12.6 1816 −1.62 +0.77 −2.39 590(75th)
2022 6-5 1747 27.5 22.4 +5.1 1586 +1.4 −6.9 +8.3 1707 −1.24 +0.91 −2.15 570(69th)
2021 8-4 1925 30.0 22.5 +7.5 1602 +5.6 −7.3 +12.8 1821 +0.68 +2.27 −1.59 608(80th)
2020 10-1 2319 38.1 11.7 +26.4 1696 +15.1 −19.2 +34.3 2357 +3.42 +3.42 −0.01 726(96th)
2019 10-2 2104 36.1 20.5 +15.6 1685 +12.2 −10.5 +22.7 2067 +3.09 +3.31 −0.22 651(88th)
2018 6-5 1475 27.5 29.8 −2.4 1658 +2.2 −0.6 +2.8 1570 −1.47 +1.06 −2.53 525(54th)
2017 6-4 1506 27.0 23.5 +3.5 1554 +1.7 −2.2 +3.9 1598 −1.33 +1.43 −2.76 532(56th)
2016 8-3 1753 37.5 29.9 +7.6 1532 +13.1 +2.7 +10.5 1762 +0.18 +1.87 −1.69 576(70th)
2015 8-4 1852 46.8 24.2 +22.5 1458 +16.7 −3.8 +20.5 2014 −0.49 +1.09 −1.58 628(84th)
2014 8-4 1801 42.2 25.5 +16.8 1495 +13.0 −3.0 +16.0 1899 +0.00 +1.18 −1.18 599(77th)
2013 2-0 1813 49.0 13.0 +36.0 1190 +15.9 −4.7 +20.6 2015 +0.14 +0.14 0.00
2012 2-0 1791 57.0 20.5 +36.5 1047 +20.2 +0.9 +19.3 1983 +0.17 +0.17 0.00
2011 3-0 1753 49.3 13.7 +35.7 1507 +20.0 −13.2 +33.1 2329 +0.80 +0.80 0.00
2010 1-2 1426 30.3 28.0 +2.3 1590 +3.3 −2.2 +5.5 1638 −1.28 +0.06 −1.34
2009 2-0 1514 36.5 10.5 +26.0 1154 +1.3 −8.7 +10.0 1750 +0.20 +0.20 0.00
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.