← Back

CLASS 6A · District 19-6A

Alvin Yellowjackets

Enrollment: 2,749 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4

Rank

#208

was #208

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

976

#208 of 249

OVR Grade

68.7

#208 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Fort Bend Clements (0-0) 718	75% (+10)	—	—	—	—
2	@Baytown Sterling	63% (+5)	—	—	—	—
3	@Pearland Dawson (0-0) 1843	3% (-35)	—	—	—	—
4	Pasadena Memorial (0-0) 1052	42% (-3)	—	—	—	—
5	@#33Manvel (0-0) 1985	< 2% (-40)	—	—	—	—
7	#16Pearland (0-0) 2282	< 2% (-52)	—	—	—	—
8	@Pasadena Sam Rayburn (0-0) 939	54% (+1)	—	—	—	—
9	#28Alvin Shadow Creek (0-0) 2095	< 2% (-45)	—	—	—	—
10	@Brazoswood (0-0) 1154	32% (-7)	—	—	—	—
11	Pasadena Dobie (0-0) 1430	13% (-18)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 19-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		16	Pearland (2) Oilers	88.4 2282	0-0	0-0	—	—	7.3-0.7	> 98%	D1
2		28	Alvin Shadow Creek (6) Sharks	85.6 2095	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.6-1.4	> 98%	D2
3		33	Manvel (9) Mavericks	83.9 1985	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.1-1.9	96.9%	D2
4		56	Pearland Dawson (5) Eagles	81.8 1843	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.5-2.5	90.3%	D1
5		141	Pasadena Dobie (1) Longhorns	75.5 1430	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.7-4.3	12.4%	—
6		189	Brazoswood (7) Buccaneers	71.4 1154	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.4-5.6	< 2%	—
7		202	Pasadena Memorial (3) Mavericks	69.8 1052	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.8-6.2	< 2%	—
8		208	Alvin (4) Yellowjackets	68.7 976	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.5-6.5	< 2%	—
9		214	Pasadena Sam Rayburn (8) Texans	68.1 939	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.3-6.7	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Alvin’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2004

6-4

Rating 531 (55th)

#2 · 2016

4-6

Rating 499 (44th)

#3 · 2015

6-4

Rating 493 (42nd)

#4 · 2005

5-6

Rating 490 (40th)

#5 · 2009

3-7

Rating 479 (36th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	3-7	1025	14.5	36.2	−21.7	1381	−16.4	+9.8	−26.2	845	−4.29	+0.07	−4.37	394(13th)
2024	3-7	958	21.7	36.9	−15.2	1331	−11.9	+11.0	−22.9	928	−5.05	+0.06	−5.11	399(15th)
2023	2-8	648	17.1	38.0	−20.9	1155	−16.4	+18.1	−34.5	637	−6.11	+0.01	−6.12	336(6th)
2022	4-6	1126	26.7	32.2	−5.5	1242	−7.0	+10.7	−17.7	1057	−3.79	+0.07	−3.85	428(21st)
2021	4-6	1200	23.0	33.2	−10.2	1470	−4.6	+7.2	−11.8	1204	−3.15	+0.20	−3.36	449(28th)
2020	1-8	844	10.1	33.8	−23.7	1551	−14.0	+7.0	−20.9	977	−5.29	+0.05	−5.35	383(12th)
2019	0-10	663	3.6	40.5	−36.9	1561	−23.1	+10.9	−34.0	651	−7.37	0.00	−7.37	329(5th)
2018	0-10	815	11.8	54.2	−42.4	1483	−18.6	+22.6	−41.2	471	−7.43	0.00	−7.43	319(4th)
2017	3-6	1221	24.9	32.3	−7.4	1488	−6.7	+2.3	−9.0	1275	−3.30	+0.09	−3.39	463(31st)
2016	4-6	1366	25.4	29.2	−3.8	1541	−1.0	+1.3	−2.3	1442	−2.86	+0.45	−3.31	499(44th)
2015	6-4	1357	29.9	25.2	+4.7	1289	−3.4	+0.1	−3.5	1414	−1.68	+0.16	−1.84	493(42nd)
2014	5-5	1289	31.7	31.5	+0.2	1298	−2.1	+5.2	−7.4	1316	−2.35	+0.17	−2.52	475(35th)
2013	2-8	982	19.8	27.7	−7.9	1324	−11.7	+4.1	−15.8	1106	−6.17	+0.03	−6.19	420(19th)
2012	4-6	1249	27.4	26.2	+1.2	1326	−5.9	+0.7	−6.6	1334	−4.17	+0.35	−4.52	475(35th)
2011	4-6	1176	23.6	31.1	−7.5	1438	−5.6	+5.2	−10.8	1230	−3.51	+0.27	−3.79	457(30th)
2010	1-9	1015	14.0	36.9	−22.9	1616	−11.7	+6.4	−18.1	1047	−6.25	+0.03	−6.28	419(19th)
2009	3-7	1368	19.9	27.3	−7.4	1442	−7.3	+2.1	−9.4	1266	−5.42	+0.35	−5.78	479(36th)
2008	2-7	1163	16.8	28.0	−11.2	1474	−7.6	+4.3	−11.9	1202	−4.98	+0.44	−5.42	452(28th)
2007	0-10	919	11.8	32.0	−20.2	1561	−10.9	+5.9	−16.9	1079	−7.25	0.00	−7.25	416(18th)
2006	2-8	1107	15.4	28.5	−13.1	1524	−9.3	+3.8	−13.0	1174	−5.88	+0.43	−6.31	446(26th)
2005	5-6	1397	14.2	20.5	−6.4	1444	−9.1	−1.2	−7.9	1302	−3.97	+0.62	−4.59	490(40th)
2004	6-4	1552	21.1	20.0	+1.1	1450	−3.4	−2.7	−0.6	1484	−1.85	+1.16	−3.02	531(55th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.