← Back

CLASS 6A · District 2-6A

Midland Bulldogs

Enrollment: 3,549 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4

Rank

#149

was #149

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1378

#149 of 249

OVR Grade

74.8

#149 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	El Paso Pebble Hills (0-0) 1521	35% (-6)	—	—	—	—
2	@Keller (0-0) 1583	30% (-8)	—	—	—	—
3	Amarillo	22% (-12)	—	—	—	—
4	@Bastrop	24% (-11)	—	—	—	—
5	@Harlingen (0-0) 1406	47% (-1)	—	—	—	—
6	Red Bluff (CA)	12% (-19)	—	—	—	—
7	@Odessa (0-0) 887	89% (+20)	—	—	—	—
9	Odessa Permian (0-0) 1752	17% (-15)	—	—	—	—
10	@San Angelo Central (0-0) 1528	35% (-6)	—	—	—	—
11	Midland Lee (0-0) 1713	20% (-13)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 2-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		66	Odessa Permian (1) Panthers	80.4 1752	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.1-0.9	> 98%	D1
2		71	Midland Lee (3) Rebels	79.8 1713	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.9-1.1	> 98%	D1
3		104	San Angelo Central (5) Bobcats	77 1528	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.2-1.8	97.4%	D2
4		149	Midland (4) Bulldogs	74.8 1378	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.6-2.4	91.8%	D2
5		223	Odessa (2) Bronchos	67.4 887	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.2-3.8	11.8%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Midland’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2005

10-3

Rating 667 (90th)

#2 · 2010

11-2

Rating 651 (88th)

#3 · 2016

9-3

Rating 615 (81st)

#4 · 2004

10-3

Rating 596 (76th)

#5 · 2024

8-4

Rating 583 (73rd)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	2-8	1261	28.6	33.4	−4.8	1597	−4.5	0.0	−4.6	1386	−4.44	+0.02	−4.47	486(39th)
2024	8-4	1671	39.5	29.3	+10.2	1474	+5.8	−4.1	+9.9	1747	−1.23	+0.69	−1.92	583(73rd)
2023	9-3	1606	36.8	23.8	+13.1	1374	+2.8	−5.7	+8.5	1714	−0.11	+1.10	−1.21	566(67th)
2022	5-5	1370	30.5	28.3	+2.2	1408	−2.6	−2.1	−0.5	1489	−2.70	+0.46	−3.16	507(47th)
2021	2-8	1190	28.8	37.0	−8.2	1591	+1.2	+5.5	−4.3	1392	−5.11	+0.28	−5.40	474(34th)
2020	1-8	1107	22.9	45.9	−23.0	1592	−5.5	+14.5	−19.9	1002	−5.26	+0.04	−5.30	410(17th)
2019	2-8	1218	13.5	42.9	−29.4	1651	−13.1	+8.8	−22.0	951	−4.44	+0.17	−4.61	419(19th)
2018	4-7	1443	31.7	38.6	−6.9	1597	+5.3	+5.5	−0.3	1493	−4.01	+0.59	−4.61	512(49th)
2017	3-8	1455	26.2	37.0	−10.8	1670	−2.5	+2.0	−4.5	1386	−3.99	+0.48	−4.47	499(44th)
2016	9-3	1878	43.1	31.6	+11.5	1662	+13.4	−3.0	+16.3	1908	+1.32	+2.04	−0.72	615(81st)
2015	4-7	1622	21.0	37.5	−16.5	1685	−3.7	+3.3	−7.0	1325	−2.38	+0.92	−3.30	505(46th)
2014	5-6	1620	28.5	25.0	+3.5	1736	+4.8	−7.6	+12.4	1810	−1.32	+1.49	−2.81	572(69th)
2013	5-5	1480	33.1	38.4	−5.3	1544	+2.2	+5.3	−3.1	1422	−2.42	+0.80	−3.22	507(47th)
2012	5-5	1645	27.2	25.6	+1.6	1580	+2.0	−2.9	+5.0	1624	−1.64	+0.38	−2.02	550(62nd)
2011	6-5	1740	31.5	24.4	+7.1	1621	+5.7	−4.8	+10.5	1763	−1.68	+1.06	−2.75	579(71st)
2010	11-2	2107	36.5	23.0	+13.5	1646	+10.9	−8.7	+19.6	1990	+3.39	+3.54	−0.15	651(88th)
2009	5-5	1621	30.7	25.2	+5.5	1457	+3.8	+0.9	+2.9	1572	−2.35	+0.40	−2.75	542(59th)
2008	8-4	1725	35.2	30.9	+4.2	1562	+8.2	+1.1	+7.0	1676	+0.27	+1.55	−1.28	575(70th)
2007	4-6	1502	18.8	24.6	−5.8	1600	−3.2	−3.5	+0.3	1507	−2.51	+0.93	−3.44	525(54th)
2006	6-6	1485	26.5	25.9	+0.6	1530	+1.2	−1.2	+2.4	1560	−3.40	+1.12	−4.52	532(56th)
2005	10-3	2023	31.7	13.5	+18.2	1573	+9.0	−11.8	+20.8	2020	+1.28	+2.54	−1.26	667(90th)
2004	10-3	1750	31.9	24.5	+7.5	1526	+7.3	−3.2	+10.4	1761	+0.32	+1.39	−1.07	596(76th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.