← Back
CLASS 6A · District 18-6A

Deer Park Deer

Enrollment: 4,104 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 1
Rank
#63
was #63
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1800
#63 of 249
OVR Grade
81.1
#63 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@Pearland Dawson (0-0) 1843
46% (-2)
2
La Porte
55% (+2)
3
@Humble Kingwood (0-0) 1718
58% (+3)
4
@Clear Brook (0-0) 739
> 98% (+42)
5
Clear Lake (0-0) 965
97% (+33)
6
Clear Springs (0-0) 1594
70% (+8)
8
Clear Creek (0-0) 1136
94% (+27)
9
@#13Dickinson (0-0) 2378
8% (-23)
10
@Barbers Hill (0-0) 1822
48% (-1)
11
Clear Falls (0-0) 1685
62% (+5)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 18-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 13
Gators
89.9
2378
0-0 0-0 6.7-0.3 > 98% D1
2 58
Eagles
81.5
1822
0-0 0-0 4.9-2.1 90% D2
3 63
Deer
81.1
1800
0-0 0-0 4.8-2.2 88.6% D1
4 78
Knights
79.4
1685
0-0 0-0 4.2-2.8 73.4% D2
5 94
Chargers
78
1594
0-0 0-0 3.8-3.2 46.1%
6 191
Wildcats
71.1
1136
0-0 0-0 1.9-5.2 < 2%
7 210
Falcons
68.5
965
0-0 0-0 1.2-5.8 < 2%
8 233
Wolverines
65.1
739
0-0 0-0 0.5-6.5 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Deer Park’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2023
9-2
Rating 617 (82nd)
#2 · 2008
8-2
Rating 599 (77th)
#3 · 2007
8-3
Rating 585 (73rd)
#4 · 2021
8-3
Rating 585 (73rd)
#5 · 2024
8-3
Rating 585 (74th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 6-5 1734 34.3 27.9 +6.4 1684 +6.7 −5.1 +11.8 1795 −0.62 +1.29 −1.91 584(73rd)
2024 8-3 1871 32.3 30.0 +2.3 1663 +5.5 −2.9 +8.5 1712 +1.37 +2.02 −0.65 585(74th)
2023 9-2 1813 45.5 18.3 +27.2 1320 +11.8 −6.1 +17.9 1947 −0.35 +0.52 −0.87 617(82nd)
2022 9-2 1752 37.9 17.3 +20.6 1270 +5.3 −5.9 +11.2 1779 −0.17 +0.72 −0.90 584(73rd)
2021 8-3 1780 42.2 23.5 +18.6 1335 +10.6 −2.6 +13.2 1830 +0.05 +0.99 −0.93 585(73rd)
2020 5-6 1428 31.5 28.4 +3.2 1438 +0.7 +1.3 −0.5 1486 −3.22 +0.21 −3.43 504(46th)
2019 7-4 1791 30.3 35.5 −5.2 1737 +6.2 +1.1 +5.0 1625 +0.38 +2.14 −1.76 561(66th)
2018 4-6 1457 36.9 39.9 −3.0 1606 +9.2 +7.9 +1.3 1533 −3.21 +0.29 −3.51 518(52nd)
2017 6-4 1644 28.0 16.7 +11.3 1236 −3.7 −4.2 +0.6 1514 −2.02 +0.52 −2.54 539(58th)
2016 7-4 1580 33.0 23.2 +9.8 1334 +2.4 −1.2 +3.6 1591 −1.61 +0.59 −2.20 538(58th)
2015 4-6 1592 34.3 31.0 +3.3 1660 +8.9 −1.9 +10.8 1769 −2.72 +0.63 −3.35 561(66th)
2014 8-3 1777 27.2 23.5 +3.7 1647 +0.8 −10.6 +11.4 1784 +0.43 +1.56 −1.13 581(72nd)
2013 4-6 1602 27.8 28.7 −0.9 1641 +2.9 −2.8 +5.7 1642 −2.67 +0.72 −3.39 548(61st)
2012 6-6 1685 31.5 22.4 +9.1 1534 +3.3 −7.7 +11.1 1777 −2.18 +0.88 −3.06 584(73rd)
2011 10-2 1812 33.3 22.0 +11.3 1460 +5.9 −3.7 +9.6 1741 +1.09 +1.82 −0.73 582(73rd)
2010 7-4 1539 23.7 20.0 +3.7 1468 −4.0 −5.6 +1.6 1541 −1.22 +1.37 −2.59 532(56th)
2009 7-4 1688 20.0 13.9 +6.1 1359 −6.3 −7.1 +0.8 1519 −1.67 +0.73 −2.40 553(63rd)
2008 8-2 1804 30.3 14.9 +15.4 1410 +4.5 −7.0 +11.5 1788 +0.41 +0.75 −0.35 599(77th)
2007 8-3 1697 31.5 16.5 +14.9 1406 +5.5 −5.6 +11.1 1778 −0.90 +0.83 −1.74 585(73rd)
2006 7-4 1657 25.9 18.7 +7.2 1369 −0.5 −4.0 +3.4 1585 −1.71 +0.93 −2.65 551(62nd)
2005 7-4 1685 25.4 18.3 +7.1 1434 −1.2 −5.2 +4.0 1600 −1.39 +0.83 −2.23 557(64th)
2004 6-4 1520 32.2 21.0 +11.2 1345 +3.7 −0.3 +4.0 1600 −2.15 +0.35 −2.51 543(60th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.