| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | @Katy Mayde Creek (1-5) 1114 |
56% (+2) | W 41-18 | 1745 | +4.1 | −5.7 | +0.13 | — |
| 3 | Fort Bend Austin (1-6) 869 |
94% (+26) | W 46-21 | 1825 | +14.6 | +1.6 | +0.02 | — |
| 4 | Jersey Village (1-5) 923 |
96% (+30) | W 28-21 | 1507 | +3.3 | +3.0 | +0.01 | — |
| 6 | @Cy-Fair (4-2) 1782 |
17% (-15) | W 35-24 | 2175 | +10.5 | −16.5 | +0.61 | — |
| 7 | @Langham Creek (5-1) 1754 |
54% (+1) | L 14-16 | 1741 | −3.9 | −13.5 | — | −0.64 |
| 8 | @Cy Creek (0-6) 788 |
98% (+37) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | @Cy Ridge (3-3) 644 |
> 98% (+42) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | Cy Lakes (4-2) 1523 |
68% (+7) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | 25% (-11) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#85
was #71
Record
4-1
2-1 district
Elo
1704
#85 of 249
OVR Grade
79.7
#85 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
79
#84 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
80.3
#69 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1799
#77 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 16-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Cy Woods’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2011
9-3
Rating 650 (88th)
#2 · 2010
10-4
Rating 648 (87th)
#3 · 2009
11-3
Rating 643 (86th)
#4 · 2008
8-3
Rating 622 (83rd)
#5 · 2024
8-3
Rating 620 (82nd)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.