← Back

CLASS 6A · District 16-6A

Langham Creek Lobos

Enrollment: 2,978 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6

Rank

#89

was #89

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1612

#89 of 249

OVR Grade

78.3

#89 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@Katy Paetow (0-0) 1598	51% (+1)	—	—	—	—
2	Houston Stratford (0-0) 1414	70% (+8)	—	—	—	—
3	@Conroe Grand Oaks (0-0) 1830	29% (-9)	—	—	—	—
4	Cy Lakes (0-0) 1481	63% (+5)	—	—	—	—
6	@Jersey Village (0-0) 827	96% (+31)	—	—	—	—
7	Cy Woods (0-0) 1458	66% (+6)	—	—	—	—
8	Cy Ridge (0-0) 730	98% (+35)	—	—	—	—
9	@#36Cy Falls (0-0) 1963	19% (-14)	—	—	—	—
10	Cy-Fair (0-0) 1710	40% (-4)	—	—	—	—
11	@Cy Creek (0-0) 1081	90% (+21)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 16-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		36	Cy Falls (7) Golden Eagles	83.6 1963	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.3-0.7	> 98%	D2
2		73	Cy-Fair (3) Bobcats	79.8 1710	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.2-1.8	93.3%	D1
3		89	Langham Creek (6) Lobos	78.3 1612	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.7-2.3	85.2%	D2
4		119	Cy Lakes (4) Spartans	76.3 1481	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-3	64.7%	D1
5		129	Cy Woods (1) Wildcats	76 1458	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.9-3.1	52.9%	—
6		198	Cy Creek (5) Cougars	70.3 1081	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.1-4.9	4.1%	—
7		225	Jersey Village (2) Falcons	66.4 827	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-6	< 2%	—
8		235	Cy Ridge (8) Rams	65 730	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.7-6.3	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Langham Creek’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2017

11-2

Rating 654 (88th)

#2 · 2014

9-2

Rating 616 (82nd)

#3 · 2013

8-3

Rating 613 (81st)

#4 · 2012

9-3

Rating 603 (78th)

#5 · 2016

8-4

Rating 600 (78th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	6-4	1477	33.0	25.6	+7.4	1423	+2.6	−1.7	+4.3	1607	−1.13	+1.01	−2.14	536(57th)
2024	4-6	1255	30.0	22.8	+7.2	1441	+1.2	−3.9	+5.1	1627	−3.66	+0.36	−4.03	518(52nd)
2023	4-6	1244	25.5	36.2	−10.7	1402	−5.2	+8.5	−13.7	1158	−3.87	+0.31	−4.18	458(30th)
2022	5-5	1400	34.7	32.8	+1.9	1378	+3.5	+6.7	−3.2	1419	−2.73	+0.68	−3.41	500(44th)
2021	4-6	1387	30.7	28.5	+2.2	1566	+3.0	−2.0	+5.0	1625	−2.51	+0.77	−3.28	522(53rd)
2020	4-5	1387	29.7	32.3	−2.7	1591	−0.5	−0.7	+0.2	1505	−2.27	+0.37	−2.65	502(45th)
2019	2-8	1185	12.6	29.5	−16.9	1544	−14.2	+0.5	−14.7	1132	−5.06	+0.15	−5.21	440(24th)
2018	6-5	1810	30.5	19.7	+10.7	1535	+2.8	−9.0	+11.8	1795	−1.90	+0.61	−2.51	585(73rd)
2017	11-2	2037	36.1	20.0	+16.1	1656	+11.9	−9.5	+21.3	2033	+2.32	+2.63	−0.31	654(88th)
2016	8-4	1737	42.7	31.7	+11.0	1601	+13.4	−1.5	+14.9	1873	−0.11	+1.50	−1.61	600(78th)
2015	5-5	1808	42.8	29.6	+13.2	1569	+12.2	−3.8	+16.0	1900	−1.89	+0.96	−2.85	599(77th)
2014	9-2	1938	40.8	27.2	+13.6	1609	+14.3	−3.3	+17.6	1941	+0.83	+1.93	−1.10	616(82nd)
2013	8-3	1910	36.4	21.4	+15.0	1558	+11.4	−5.7	+17.1	1927	+0.07	+1.85	−1.78	613(81st)
2012	9-3	1919	40.4	29.9	+10.5	1586	+11.4	−2.1	+13.6	1839	+1.60	+2.63	−1.03	603(78th)
2011	6-5	1647	43.5	35.8	+7.6	1501	+15.7	+6.6	+9.1	1727	−1.92	+0.77	−2.70	566(67th)
2010	5-5	1362	29.6	34.6	−5.0	1514	+1.8	+5.9	−4.1	1398	−2.91	+0.63	−3.53	497(43rd)
2009	5-5	1505	29.1	31.7	−2.6	1543	+1.8	+1.6	+0.2	1506	−2.05	+0.65	−2.70	523(53rd)
2008	3-7	1396	25.7	33.4	−7.7	1666	+2.0	+3.3	−1.3	1468	−3.79	+0.62	−4.42	509(48th)
2007	6-4	1616	25.5	24.5	+1.0	1512	−1.5	−3.2	+1.7	1542	−1.28	+0.47	−1.75	541(59th)
2006	6-4	1491	26.9	28.3	−1.4	1454	+2.6	+3.0	−0.4	1490	−1.76	+0.81	−2.57	522(53rd)
2005	6-4	1396	28.9	25.9	+3.0	1403	+4.6	+4.6	0.0	1501	−2.14	+0.87	−3.01	516(51st)
2004	0-10	897	8.8	30.6	−21.8	1458	−14.8	+8.7	−23.6	911	−8.78	0.00	−8.78	395(14th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.