← Back
CLASS 6A · District 21-6A

Fort Bend Clements Rangers

Enrollment: 2,626 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6
Rank
#193
was #194
Record
3-4
0-4 district
Elo
1095
#193 of 249
OVR Grade
70.5
#193 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
72.9
#145 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
67.4
#190 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1202
#170 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
@Alvin (0-6) 678
 25% (-10) W 48-30 1204 +1.3 +13.1 +0.03 —
2
Houston Westside (0-7) 464
 66% (+6) W 62-7 1617 +9.4 +4.7 +0.01 —
3
Lamar Consolidated
 18% (-14) W 23-7 1549 −12.0 −14.0 +0.11 —
4
@Fort Bend Travis (6-1) 1770
 9% (-22) L 34-66 859 +10.1 +35.7 — −0.63
5
#10Fort Bend Ridge Point (7-0) 2445
 < 2% (-51) L 3-40 1462 −6.7 −5.2 — −0.08
6
@Strake Jesuit (2-5) 1493
 24% (-11) L 14-45 704 −10.4 +21.5 — −0.85
7
@Fort Bend Hightower (5-2) 1828
 5% (-29) L 3-42 1016 −12.7 +6.7 — −0.53
9
Fort Bend Austin (1-6) 869
 72% (+9) — — — — — —
10
@Fort Bend Elkins (2-5) 1464
 18% (-15) — — — — — —
11
Fort Bend Bush (1-6) 1215
 38% (-5) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 21-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 10
Panthers
90.9
2445
 7-0 4-0 41.9 12.9 6.9-0.1 > 98% D2
2 63
Hurricanes
81.6
1828
 5-2 4-0 36.3 13.4 5.6-1.4 > 98% D2
3 71
Tigers
80.7
1770
 6-1 4-0 32.7 21.0 5.3-1.7 > 98% D1
4 124
Crusaders
76.5
1493
 2-5 2-2 18.4 27.4 3.5-3.5 59.2% D1
5 127
Knights
76.1
1464
 2-5 1-3 22.0 31.0 3.2-3.8 38.9% —
6 174
Broncos
72.3
1215
 1-6 1-3 12.4 35.4 1.9-5.1 < 2% —
7 193
Rangers
70.5
1095
 3-4 0-4 26.7 33.9 1.3-5.7 < 2% —
8 217
Bulldogs
67.1
869
 1-6 0-4 19.3 30.3 0.4-6.6 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Fort Bend Clements’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2007
13-1
Rating 611 (80th)
#2 · 2006
8-3
Rating 555 (64th)
#3 · 2009
7-3
Rating 519 (52nd)
#4 · 2005
7-4
Rating 502 (45th)
#5 · 2008
3-5
Rating 492 (41st)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 2-8 679 16.4 47.0 −30.6 1295 −19.5 +20.0 −39.5 512 −5.91 +0.02 −5.93 317(4th)
2024 1-9 580 12.3 52.3 −40.0 1238 −20.6 +29.8 −50.4 240 −7.06 +0.00 −7.07 273(1st)
2023 4-6 1289 23.0 33.8 −10.8 1418 −6.0 +8.4 −14.4 1139 −3.55 +0.19 −3.75 460(30th)
2022 5-6 1379 20.8 37.5 −16.6 1493 −5.4 +12.1 −17.6 1061 −3.01 +0.36 −3.38 450(28th)
2021 6-4 1394 26.5 25.2 +1.3 1368 −1.0 +3.5 −4.6 1386 −1.20 +0.62 −1.82 491(41st)
2020 4-6 1060 24.6 23.5 +1.1 1195 −8.7 +5.3 −14.0 1150 −4.70 +0.12 −4.81 425(21st)
2019 1-9 705 16.0 38.4 −22.4 1392 −13.2 +14.1 −27.3 818 −6.67 +0.00 −6.68 354(8th)
2018 2-7 684 21.1 35.2 −14.1 1368 −11.7 +9.1 −20.8 979 −4.75 +0.02 −4.77 375(10th)
2017 0-9 582 10.6 49.8 −39.2 1432 −19.0 +22.4 −41.4 466 −7.12 0.00 −7.12 298(3rd)
2016 1-9 666 13.1 43.4 −30.3 1387 −18.2 +15.9 −34.1 646 −7.22 +0.00 −7.23 329(5th)
2015 0-10 795 7.2 33.3 −26.1 1351 −21.0 +10.4 −31.4 714 −8.22 0.00 −8.22 349(7th)
2014 2-8 950 31.4 37.3 −5.9 1354 +1.5 +14.9 −13.3 1167 −6.71 +0.08 −6.79 424(21st)
2013 1-9 904 24.6 47.1 −22.5 1541 −4.4 +16.6 −21.0 975 −6.68 +0.20 −6.88 396(14th)
2012 1-9 935 12.7 29.5 −16.8 1561 −13.0 +1.6 −14.6 1136 −6.79 +0.38 −7.17 420(20th)
2011 1-9 1050 13.5 27.8 −14.3 1432 −11.7 +5.1 −16.7 1082 −7.15 +0.07 −7.22 425(21st)
2010 4-6 1196 26.5 31.7 −5.2 1340 −1.7 +9.0 −10.7 1233 −4.66 +0.32 −4.98 459(30th)
2009 7-3 1533 22.2 19.9 +2.3 1380 −3.3 −1.7 −1.6 1460 −0.77 +0.76 −1.53 519(52nd)
2008 3-5 1411 21.2 24.2 −3.0 1376 −6.0 +0.6 −6.6 1335 −3.66 +0.11 −3.77 492(41st)
2007 13-1 1938 32.9 20.2 +12.6 1440 +8.2 −2.2 +10.4 1760 +2.23 +2.32 −0.09 611(80th)
2006 8-3 1659 29.1 18.3 +10.8 1349 +2.3 −2.2 +4.5 1612 −1.16 +1.07 −2.23 555(64th)
2005 7-4 1458 19.9 20.5 −0.6 1361 −7.1 −1.0 −6.1 1348 −1.58 +0.97 −2.55 502(45th)
2004 5-5 1173 18.1 19.0 −0.9 1199 −11.6 +2.3 −13.9 1152 −3.85 +0.26 −4.12 452(28th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.