| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @Pasadena Dobie (2-4) 1248 |
67% (+7) | L 15-17 | 1152 | −16.7 | −2.8 | — | −0.85 |
| 2 | Houston Heights (2-4) 1367 |
54% (+1) | W 30-27 | 1481 | +3.5 | +4.3 | +0.19 | — |
| 3 | @Richmond George Ranch (3-3) 1355 |
82% (+15) | L 13-14 | 1299 | −17.6 | −9.6 | — | −0.93 |
| 4 | Clear Creek (1-5) 1150 |
82% (+15) | W 23-21 | 1216 | −10.7 | +0.7 | +0.05 | — |
| 5 | 6% (-26) | L 7-59 | 1067 | −4.1 | +13.3 | — | −0.19 | |
| 6 | 9% (-22) | L 21-38 | 1807 | +7.8 | −4.5 | — | −0.28 | |
| 8 | @Clear Falls (3-3) 1637 |
38% (-5) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | Clear Brook (1-5) 686 |
97% (+33) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | @Clear Lake (2-4) 1116 |
84% (+16) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | #43Barbers Hill (6-0) 2004 |
12% (-19) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#118
was #117
Record
2-4
1-2 district
Elo
1518
#118 of 249
OVR Grade
76.9
#118 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
70.6
#174 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
74.8
#120 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1337
#154 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 18-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Clear Springs’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2023
7-5
Rating 657 (89th)
#2 · 2016
9-2
Rating 654 (88th)
#3 · 2017
8-3
Rating 654 (88th)
#4 · 2022
8-4
Rating 647 (87th)
#5 · 2021
7-5
Rating 644 (86th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.