← Back

CLASS 6A · District 18-6A

Dickinson Gators

Enrollment: 3,858 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 2

Rank

#13

was #13

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

2378

#13 of 249

OVR Grade

89.9

#13 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	#19Fort Bend Ridge Point (0-0) 2225	65% (+6)	—	—	—	—
2	#10Katy (0-0) 2427	45% (-2)	—	—	—	—
3	#12Humble Atascocita (0-0) 2401	48% (-1)	—	—	—	—
4	@Clear Lake (0-0) 965	> 98% (+57)	—	—	—	—
5	Clear Springs (0-0) 1594	96% (+31)	—	—	—	—
6	@Clear Creek (0-0) 1136	> 98% (+50)	—	—	—	—
8	@Barbers Hill (0-0) 1822	91% (+22)	—	—	—	—
9	Deer Park (0-0) 1800	92% (+23)	—	—	—	—
10	@Clear Falls (0-0) 1685	95% (+28)	—	—	—	—
11	Clear Brook (0-0) 739	> 98% (+66)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 18-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		13	Dickinson (2) Gators	89.9 2378	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.7-0.3	> 98%	D1
2		58	Barbers Hill (8) Eagles	81.5 1822	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.9-2.1	90%	D2
3		63	Deer Park (1) Deer	81.1 1800	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.8-2.2	88.6%	D1
4		78	Clear Falls (4) Knights	79.4 1685	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.2-2.8	73.4%	D2
5		94	Clear Springs (3) Chargers	78 1594	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.8-3.2	46.1%	—
6		191	Clear Creek (6) Wildcats	71.1 1136	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.9-5.2	< 2%	—
7		210	Clear Lake (5) Falcons	68.5 965	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.2-5.8	< 2%	—
8		233	Clear Brook (7) Wolverines	65.1 739	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.5-6.5	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Dickinson’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2025

13-1

Rating 744 (97th)

#2 · 2016

10-2

Rating 710 (95th)

#3 · 2021

9-3

Rating 705 (94th)

#4 · 2023

9-2

Rating 705 (94th)

#5 · 2019

10-2

Rating 696 (94th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	13-1	2388	50.0	22.2	+27.8	1768	+23.2	−14.2	+37.5	2436	+5.63	+5.69	−0.06	744(97th)
2024	7-4	2116	48.0	27.4	+20.6	1719	+22.2	−5.5	+27.7	2192	+0.96	+1.77	−0.81	672(91st)
2023	9-2	2117	40.1	15.4	+24.7	1681	+16.9	−17.0	+33.9	2349	+2.07	+2.71	−0.64	705(94th)
2022	8-4	2044	31.8	17.6	+14.2	1681	+9.3	−14.8	+24.1	2102	+1.01	+2.52	−1.52	657(89th)
2021	9-3	2272	38.7	22.8	+15.8	1829	+17.0	−14.1	+31.1	2278	+3.08	+3.35	−0.26	705(94th)
2020	5-3	2042	38.6	23.4	+15.2	1791	+18.4	−8.4	+26.8	2169	+0.69	+1.25	−0.56	656(88th)
2019	10-2	2205	44.8	18.3	+26.4	1721	+19.1	−15.0	+34.1	2351	+2.59	+2.75	−0.16	696(94th)
2018	10-2	2210	41.5	16.8	+24.8	1590	+13.9	−14.4	+28.3	2208	+2.18	+2.54	−0.36	692(93rd)
2017	8-3	2131	34.8	21.5	+13.4	1693	+9.2	−12.1	+21.2	2030	+1.16	+2.70	−1.54	646(87th)
2016	10-2	2213	31.4	11.2	+20.2	1699	+8.1	−21.0	+29.2	2229	+3.29	+3.71	−0.43	710(95th)
2015	12-2	2111	37.7	19.5	+18.2	1589	+11.3	−9.8	+21.2	2029	+2.56	+3.05	−0.50	650(87th)
2014	13-1	2178	38.1	14.8	+23.3	1586	+12.8	−14.0	+26.8	2170	+3.58	+3.79	−0.21	693(93rd)
2013	5-5	1589	24.6	25.7	−1.1	1489	−4.6	−2.8	−1.8	1455	−2.58	+1.05	−3.63	521(52nd)
2012	2-8	1203	30.5	41.0	−10.5	1426	+0.1	+13.4	−13.3	1167	−5.99	+0.16	−6.15	449(27th)
2011	3-6	1394	24.3	27.7	−3.3	1561	−2.4	−0.5	−1.9	1452	−3.55	+0.47	−4.03	507(47th)
2010	6-6	1649	26.2	26.0	+0.2	1654	+1.7	−5.3	+7.0	1675	−2.02	+1.72	−3.74	571(69th)
2009	7-5	1535	25.9	21.5	+4.4	1447	−0.7	−3.0	+2.3	1558	−3.07	+0.73	−3.80	533(56th)
2008	9-3	1669	24.2	19.2	+5.1	1532	+1.2	−5.2	+6.4	1659	+0.03	+1.78	−1.75	570(69th)
2007	1-0	1337	28.0	7.0	+21.0	1154	−0.5	−5.6	+5.0	1626	+0.06	+0.06	0.00	—
2006	1-0	1222	21.0	16.0	+5.0	1205	−17.6	−3.9	−13.6	1159	+0.08	+0.08	0.00	—
2004	0-1	1095	15.0	41.0	−26.0	1272	−13.7	+19.5	−33.2	670	−0.94	0.00	−0.94	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.