← Back
CLASS 6A · District 18-6A

Clear Brook Wolverines

Enrollment: 2,425 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 7
Rank
#233
was #235
Record
1-5
0-3 district
Elo
686
#233 of 249
OVR Grade
64.3
#233 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
67.4
#204 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
57
#235 of 249 in 6A
Perf
703
#226 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
Houston Madison
 25% (-10) W 27-26 984 −11.8 +8.8 +0.03 —
2
@Friendswood
 < 2% (-41) L 11-71 303 −10.9 +36.9 — −0.55
3
Cy Ridge (3-3) 644
 64% (+6) L 30-35 410 −20.0 +23.6 — −0.99
4
#30Deer Park (6-0) 2095
 < 2% (-55) L 7-54 1057 −6.2 +11.5 — −0.28
5
@Clear Falls (3-3) 1637
 2% (-37) L 21-52 778 −8.7 +20.1 — −0.74
6
#43Barbers Hill (6-0) 2004
 < 2% (-53) L 11-72 688 −6.7 +25.8 — −0.34
8
Clear Lake (2-4) 1116
 14% (-17) — — — — — —
9
@Clear Springs (2-4) 1518
 3% (-33) — — — — — —
10
Clear Creek (1-5) 1150
 13% (-19) — — — — — —
11
@#22Dickinson (3-3) 2210
 < 2% (-61) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 18-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 22
Gators
87.3
2210
 3-3 3-0 39.5 17.5 6.2-0.8 > 98% D1
2 30
Deer
85.6
2095
 6-0 3-0 45.8 9.8 5.8-1.2 > 98% D1
3 43
Eagles
84.2
2004
 6-0 3-0 50.7 15.2 5.6-1.4 > 98% D2
4 96
Knights
78.7
1637
 3-3 2-1 31.2 31.8 3.7-3.3 65.3% D2
5 118
Chargers
76.9
1518
 2-4 1-2 18.2 29.3 3.3-3.7 34.9% —
6 183
Wildcats
71.3
1150
 1-5 0-3 16.5 37.0 1.6-5.4 < 2% —
7 188
Falcons
70.8
1116
 2-4 0-3 18.5 46.0 1.5-5.5 < 2% —
8 233
Wolverines
64.3
686
 1-5 0-3 17.8 51.7 0.3-6.7 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Clear Brook’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2016
8-5
Rating 588 (74th)
#2 · 2012
6-6
Rating 552 (62nd)
#3 · 2010
5-5
Rating 538 (58th)
#4 · 2008
7-4
Rating 536 (57th)
#5 · 2017
5-4
Rating 536 (57th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 0-10 664 18.8 57.2 −38.4 1502 −11.5 +27.6 −39.2 521 −7.36 0.00 −7.36 317(4th)
2024 1-9 876 18.5 46.7 −28.2 1460 −12.2 +17.5 −29.7 757 −6.20 +0.00 −6.20 369(9th)
2023 3-7 1160 9.2 36.2 −27.0 1613 −14.6 +5.1 −19.7 1006 −3.89 +0.45 −4.34 431(22nd)
2022 1-9 1036 14.6 33.3 −18.7 1575 −11.1 +3.4 −14.5 1138 −5.75 +0.06 −5.80 430(22nd)
2021 3-6 1253 26.8 31.8 −5.0 1540 −0.9 +1.7 −2.6 1434 −3.45 +0.26 −3.72 485(38th)
2020 4-6 1213 16.1 25.7 −9.6 1486 −10.8 −0.7 −10.0 1249 −3.34 +0.45 −3.79 452(28th)
2019 2-8 1171 19.4 39.5 −20.1 1565 −6.7 +9.5 −16.1 1096 −4.79 +0.10 −4.88 434(23rd)
2018 3-8 1324 23.5 33.2 −9.7 1613 −5.3 +0.6 −5.8 1354 −4.35 +0.22 −4.58 482(37th)
2017 5-4 1643 33.6 35.1 −1.6 1558 +6.1 +4.5 +1.5 1539 −1.07 +0.81 −1.88 536(57th)
2016 8-5 1774 33.2 27.3 +5.8 1598 +7.0 −3.3 +10.3 1757 0.00 +1.89 −1.89 588(74th)
2015 3-7 1368 26.7 34.3 −7.6 1626 +0.1 +3.5 −3.4 1415 −3.38 +0.20 −3.58 494(42nd)
2014 1-8 1168 22.2 37.1 −14.9 1639 −3.6 +5.3 −8.9 1277 −5.51 +0.06 −5.57 458(30th)
2013 5-5 1314 18.4 25.5 −7.1 1506 −8.8 −2.1 −6.7 1332 −2.36 +1.73 −4.09 480(37th)
2012 6-6 1656 27.8 27.3 +0.4 1505 −0.3 −2.2 +2.0 1549 −2.31 +1.09 −3.40 552(62nd)
2011 4-7 1503 21.4 32.4 −11.0 1630 −3.9 +3.4 −7.4 1316 −3.43 +0.46 −3.90 498(43rd)
2010 5-5 1513 25.8 28.5 −2.7 1669 +1.1 −3.0 +4.1 1603 −1.94 +0.83 −2.77 538(58th)
2009 3-7 1345 29.8 30.0 −0.2 1461 +2.5 +5.0 −2.5 1437 −5.23 +0.46 −5.69 500(44th)
2008 7-4 1539 27.4 26.0 +1.4 1493 +4.4 +3.0 +1.4 1535 −1.63 +1.33 −2.96 536(57th)
2007 3-8 1467 22.5 25.9 −3.5 1581 0.0 +0.3 −0.3 1493 −3.99 +0.52 −4.51 520(52nd)
2006 2-8 1277 17.0 30.1 −13.1 1614 −5.5 +3.0 −8.5 1287 −5.00 +0.36 −5.36 476(35th)
2005 5-5 1449 15.8 19.5 −3.7 1439 −6.8 −1.1 −5.8 1356 −2.95 +0.48 −3.43 502(45th)
2004 6-5 1507 21.9 22.3 −0.4 1490 −1.5 −0.1 −1.3 1467 −2.50 +0.82 −3.32 524(53rd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.