← Back
CLASS 6A · District 18-6A

Clear Brook Wolverines

Enrollment: 2,425 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 7
Rank
#233
was #233
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
739
#233 of 249
OVR Grade
65.1
#233 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
Houston Madison
25% (-10)
2
@Friendswood
< 2% (-42)
3
Cy Ridge (0-0) 730
51% (+0)
4
Deer Park (0-0) 1800
< 2% (-42)
5
@Clear Falls (0-0) 1685
< 2% (-38)
6
Barbers Hill (0-0) 1822
< 2% (-43)
8
Clear Lake (0-0) 965
28% (-9)
9
@Clear Springs (0-0) 1594
3% (-34)
10
Clear Creek (0-0) 1136
16% (-16)
11
@#13Dickinson (0-0) 2378
< 2% (-66)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 18-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 13
Gators
89.9
2378
0-0 0-0 6.7-0.3 > 98% D1
2 58
Eagles
81.5
1822
0-0 0-0 4.9-2.1 90% D2
3 63
Deer
81.1
1800
0-0 0-0 4.8-2.2 88.6% D1
4 78
Knights
79.4
1685
0-0 0-0 4.2-2.8 73.4% D2
5 94
Chargers
78
1594
0-0 0-0 3.8-3.2 46.1%
6 191
Wildcats
71.1
1136
0-0 0-0 1.9-5.2 < 2%
7 210
Falcons
68.5
965
0-0 0-0 1.2-5.8 < 2%
8 233
Wolverines
65.1
739
0-0 0-0 0.5-6.5 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Clear Brook’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2016
8-5
Rating 588 (74th)
#2 · 2012
6-6
Rating 552 (62nd)
#3 · 2010
5-5
Rating 538 (58th)
#4 · 2008
7-4
Rating 536 (57th)
#5 · 2017
5-4
Rating 536 (57th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 0-10 664 18.8 57.2 −38.4 1502 −11.5 +27.6 −39.2 521 −7.36 0.00 −7.36 317(4th)
2024 1-9 876 18.5 46.7 −28.2 1460 −12.2 +17.5 −29.7 757 −6.20 +0.00 −6.20 369(9th)
2023 3-7 1160 9.2 36.2 −27.0 1613 −14.6 +5.1 −19.7 1006 −3.89 +0.45 −4.34 431(22nd)
2022 1-9 1036 14.6 33.3 −18.7 1575 −11.1 +3.4 −14.5 1138 −5.75 +0.06 −5.80 430(22nd)
2021 3-6 1253 26.8 31.8 −5.0 1540 −0.9 +1.7 −2.6 1434 −3.45 +0.26 −3.72 485(38th)
2020 4-6 1213 16.1 25.7 −9.6 1486 −10.8 −0.7 −10.0 1249 −3.34 +0.45 −3.79 452(28th)
2019 2-8 1171 19.4 39.5 −20.1 1565 −6.7 +9.5 −16.1 1096 −4.79 +0.10 −4.88 434(23rd)
2018 3-8 1324 23.5 33.2 −9.7 1613 −5.3 +0.6 −5.8 1354 −4.35 +0.22 −4.58 482(37th)
2017 5-4 1643 33.6 35.1 −1.6 1558 +6.1 +4.5 +1.5 1539 −1.07 +0.81 −1.88 536(57th)
2016 8-5 1774 33.2 27.3 +5.8 1598 +7.0 −3.3 +10.3 1757 0.00 +1.89 −1.89 588(74th)
2015 3-7 1368 26.7 34.3 −7.6 1626 +0.1 +3.5 −3.4 1415 −3.38 +0.20 −3.58 494(42nd)
2014 1-8 1168 22.2 37.1 −14.9 1639 −3.6 +5.3 −8.9 1277 −5.51 +0.06 −5.57 458(30th)
2013 5-5 1314 18.4 25.5 −7.1 1506 −8.8 −2.1 −6.7 1332 −2.36 +1.73 −4.09 480(37th)
2012 6-6 1656 27.8 27.3 +0.4 1505 −0.3 −2.2 +2.0 1549 −2.31 +1.09 −3.40 552(62nd)
2011 4-7 1503 21.4 32.4 −11.0 1630 −3.9 +3.4 −7.4 1316 −3.43 +0.46 −3.90 498(43rd)
2010 5-5 1513 25.8 28.5 −2.7 1669 +1.1 −3.0 +4.1 1603 −1.94 +0.83 −2.77 538(58th)
2009 3-7 1345 29.8 30.0 −0.2 1461 +2.5 +5.0 −2.5 1437 −5.23 +0.46 −5.69 500(44th)
2008 7-4 1539 27.4 26.0 +1.4 1493 +4.4 +3.0 +1.4 1535 −1.63 +1.33 −2.96 536(57th)
2007 3-8 1467 22.5 25.9 −3.5 1581 0.0 +0.3 −0.3 1493 −3.99 +0.52 −4.51 520(52nd)
2006 2-8 1277 17.0 30.1 −13.1 1614 −5.5 +3.0 −8.5 1287 −5.00 +0.36 −5.36 476(35th)
2005 5-5 1449 15.8 19.5 −3.7 1439 −6.8 −1.1 −5.8 1356 −2.95 +0.48 −3.43 502(45th)
2004 6-5 1507 21.9 22.3 −0.4 1490 −1.5 −0.1 −1.3 1467 −2.50 +0.82 −3.32 524(53rd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.