← Back
CLASS 6A · District 16-6A

Cy Ridge Rams

Enrollment: 2,697 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 8
Rank
#236
was #229
Record
3-3
1-2 district
Elo
644
#236 of 249
OVR Grade
63.7
#236 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
64.9
#221 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
55.4
#239 of 249 in 6A
Perf
566
#234 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
Aldine MacArthur (4-2) 943
 51% (+0) L 14-48 185 −23.4 +29.2 — −0.99
2
@Cy Park (1-5) 782
 36% (-6) W 28-27 723 −13.1 +18.0 +0.01 —
3
@Clear Brook (1-5) 686
 36% (-6) W 35-30 804 −14.8 +13.0 +0.01 —
5
Cy Creek (0-6) 788
 38% (-5) W 42-40 796 +0.8 +29.0 +0.01 —
6
@Cy Lakes (4-2) 1523
 8% (-24) L 17-54 580 −10.6 +26.2 — −0.88
7
Jersey Village (1-5) 923
 45% (-2) L 0-41 307 −24.7 +23.0 — −0.99
8
@Langham Creek (5-1) 1754
 < 2% (-44) — — — — — —
9
Cy Woods (4-1) 1704
 < 2% (-42) — — — — — —
10
#46Cy Falls (5-1) 1967
 < 2% (-53) — — — — — —
11
@Cy-Fair (4-2) 1782
 < 2% (-46) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 16-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 72
Lobos
80.4
1754
 5-1 3-0 29.2 16.2 5.7-1.3 > 98% D2
2 46
Golden Eagles
83.7
1967
 5-1 2-1 36.3 15.7 5.4-1.6 97.2% D2
3 85
Wildcats
79.7
1704
 4-1 2-1 32.8 20.0 4.9-2.1 90.3% D1
4 70
Bobcats
80.9
1782
 4-2 1-2 40.8 26.5 4.2-2.8 64.4% D1
5 117
Spartans
77
1523
 4-2 2-1 30.2 25.2 4.4-2.5 48% —
6 212
Falcons
67.9
923
 1-5 1-2 16.0 23.3 1.8-5.2 < 2% —
7 236
Rams
63.7
644
 3-3 1-2 22.7 40.0 1-6 < 2% —
8 225
Cougars
65.9
788
 0-6 0-3 15.0 36.3 0.4-6.6 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Cy Ridge’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2007
11-2
Rating 650 (87th)
#2 · 2008
9-3
Rating 633 (85th)
#3 · 2016
11-3
Rating 626 (84th)
#4 · 2006
6-5
Rating 598 (77th)
#5 · 2009
7-5
Rating 598 (77th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 1-9 643 17.3 41.4 −24.1 1266 −15.7 +17.7 −33.4 666 −7.25 +0.00 −7.26 335(5th)
2024 3-7 893 20.6 35.5 −14.9 1250 −11.1 +13.0 −24.1 898 −5.05 +0.06 −5.11 388(13th)
2023 2-8 715 14.8 36.9 −22.1 1215 −20.6 +14.9 −35.5 612 −6.46 +0.00 −6.46 338(6th)
2022 2-8 838 15.1 40.8 −25.7 1307 −18.8 +15.3 −34.1 648 −5.58 +0.01 −5.58 346(7th)
2021 2-8 1006 19.9 37.6 −17.7 1447 −10.2 +8.0 −18.2 1046 −5.50 +0.04 −5.54 411(17th)
2020 2-8 1031 27.5 35.8 −8.3 1371 −3.4 +10.1 −13.5 1162 −5.74 +0.01 −5.75 424(21st)
2019 5-5 1484 27.0 22.2 +4.8 1479 0.0 −2.1 +2.1 1552 −1.84 +0.89 −2.73 522(53rd)
2018 7-3 1708 31.9 18.2 +13.7 1446 +3.8 −7.6 +11.4 1784 −0.46 +1.39 −1.85 576(71st)
2017 1-8 1393 20.7 28.2 −7.6 1638 −3.5 −2.7 −0.8 1480 −5.39 +0.02 −5.41 506(46th)
2016 11-3 1963 37.1 25.6 +11.6 1581 +7.5 −7.4 +15.0 1875 +1.90 +2.90 −1.00 626(84th)
2015 4-6 1410 29.1 32.1 −3.0 1578 −1.7 −1.6 0.0 1499 −2.42 +0.55 −2.98 509(48th)
2014 2-8 1241 14.2 32.2 −18.0 1584 −12.8 +0.4 −13.2 1169 −4.74 +0.12 −4.86 451(28th)
2013 7-5 1618 28.8 27.0 +1.8 1585 +4.4 −0.6 +4.9 1624 −1.07 +1.60 −2.68 547(61st)
2012 5-5 1579 33.6 24.8 +8.8 1546 +3.3 −6.0 +9.3 1732 −1.58 +1.31 −2.89 558(65th)
2011 5-5 1592 23.1 28.0 −4.9 1578 −4.8 −4.4 −0.5 1488 −2.01 +0.59 −2.60 528(55th)
2010 6-5 1733 35.7 22.8 +12.9 1537 +7.5 −6.9 +14.4 1861 −1.80 +0.74 −2.54 592(76th)
2009 7-5 1809 31.4 27.4 +4.0 1734 +8.1 −3.6 +11.7 1794 −0.33 +2.18 −2.51 598(77th)
2008 9-3 1992 40.3 27.5 +12.8 1626 +16.1 −2.0 +18.1 1954 +0.69 +2.40 −1.72 633(85th)
2007 11-2 2086 36.9 18.2 +18.8 1577 +11.8 −9.4 +21.2 2030 +2.42 +3.43 −1.01 650(87th)
2006 6-5 1605 28.5 17.1 +11.4 1663 +5.8 −11.7 +17.5 1937 −1.98 +0.78 −2.76 598(77th)
2005 3-7 1085 19.3 26.6 −7.3 1521 −3.3 +3.9 −7.2 1321 −5.63 +0.43 −6.06 465(32nd)
2004 7-4 1568 24.5 23.7 +0.8 1388 −0.5 +2.1 −2.5 1437 −1.87 +1.07 −2.94 525(54th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.