← Back

CLASS 6A · District 23-6A

Cy Springs Panthers

Enrollment: 2,569 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6

Rank

#96

was #96

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1592

#96 of 249

OVR Grade

78

#96 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	College Station	15% (-16)	—	—	—	—
2	Fort Bend Hightower (0-0) 1756	34% (-7)	—	—	—	—
3	@Cy-Fair (0-0) 1710	38% (-5)	—	—	—	—
5	Cy Park (0-0) 764	97% (+33)	—	—	—	—
6	@#32Bridgeland (0-0) 2023	14% (-17)	—	—	—	—
7	@#41Waller (0-0) 1938	19% (-14)	—	—	—	—
8	Richmond George Ranch (0-0) 1232	82% (+14)	—	—	—	—
9	@Richmond Foster (0-0) 1325	75% (+11)	—	—	—	—
10	#39Fulshear (0-0) 1944	19% (-14)	—	—	—	—
11	@#31Cy Ranch (0-0) 2039	13% (-18)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 23-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		31	Cy Ranch (2) Mustangs	84.7 2039	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.5-1.5	96%	D1
2		32	Bridgeland (1) Bears	84.5 2023	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.4-1.6	95.6%	D1
3		39	Fulshear (3) Chargers	83.3 1944	0-0	0-0	—	—	5-2	91.4%	D2
4		41	Waller (4) Bulldogs	83.2 1938	0-0	0-0	—	—	5-2	90.6%	D2
5		96	Cy Springs (6) Panthers	78 1592	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.2-3.8	22.5%	—
6		164	Richmond Foster (7) Falcons	74 1325	0-0	0-0	—	—	2-5	2.9%	—
7		176	Richmond George Ranch (8) Longhorns	72.6 1232	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.6-5.4	< 2%	—
8		230	Cy Park (5) Tigers	65.5 764	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.3-6.7	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Cy Springs’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2024

8-3

Rating 570 (69th)

#2 · 2023

8-3

Rating 564 (67th)

#3 · 2025

6-4

Rating 546 (61st)

#4 · 2017

4-5

Rating 534 (57th)

#5 · 2009

4-6

Rating 515 (50th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	6-4	1463	35.1	24.5	+10.6	1444	+5.2	−2.6	+7.8	1695	−1.81	+0.91	−2.72	546(61st)
2024	8-3	1692	35.0	22.5	+12.5	1386	+5.8	−2.9	+8.7	1717	−0.29	+0.95	−1.25	570(69th)
2023	8-3	1677	33.6	24.6	+9.0	1393	+3.3	−2.9	+6.2	1656	−0.21	+1.17	−1.38	564(67th)
2022	4-6	1360	28.1	27.6	+0.5	1414	−1.3	+1.4	−2.8	1431	−3.25	+0.53	−3.78	499(44th)
2021	2-8	1007	18.6	36.4	−17.8	1564	−9.7	+6.5	−16.2	1095	−4.51	+0.09	−4.60	417(19th)
2020	1-9	870	14.3	47.0	−32.7	1599	−13.8	+15.4	−29.2	770	−5.63	+0.07	−5.70	357(8th)
2019	0-10	751	8.8	37.1	−28.3	1643	−17.6	+5.1	−22.7	933	−7.15	0.00	−7.15	374(10th)
2018	1-9	1072	14.5	40.1	−25.6	1576	−10.9	+10.8	−21.7	957	−6.05	+0.02	−6.07	407(16th)
2017	4-5	1450	29.0	29.0	0.0	1632	+4.9	−1.2	+6.1	1652	−2.33	+0.37	−2.70	534(57th)
2016	3-7	1289	40.7	53.1	−12.4	1565	+10.9	+19.4	−8.5	1288	−4.07	+0.22	−4.29	471(34th)
2015	3-7	1253	34.8	44.9	−10.1	1502	+4.2	+12.5	−8.2	1295	−3.55	+0.30	−3.85	468(33rd)
2014	3-7	1113	28.2	37.9	−9.7	1534	+0.8	+8.3	−7.5	1312	−3.90	+0.15	−4.05	458(30th)
2013	3-7	1041	22.9	33.3	−10.4	1500	−2.8	+7.3	−10.1	1247	−4.24	+0.23	−4.47	444(26th)
2012	1-9	802	14.8	48.7	−33.9	1535	−15.0	+16.8	−31.8	705	−5.91	+0.03	−5.94	351(7th)
2011	0-10	842	18.1	48.1	−30.0	1546	−9.8	+16.8	−26.6	835	−6.35	0.00	−6.35	374(10th)
2010	2-8	1195	22.6	36.1	−13.5	1469	−5.9	+8.1	−14.0	1149	−5.78	+0.18	−5.96	449(27th)
2009	4-6	1395	24.3	29.3	−5.0	1626	−0.3	−1.2	+0.9	1524	−2.64	+0.35	−3.00	515(50th)
2008	4-5	1318	24.0	33.9	−9.9	1631	−1.4	+3.0	−4.4	1390	−2.53	+0.65	−3.18	491(41st)
2007	2-8	1157	16.3	29.0	−12.7	1619	−8.5	−0.1	−8.4	1289	−4.28	+0.16	−4.44	466(32nd)
2006	1-9	1095	19.1	24.6	−5.5	1640	−3.8	−3.8	−0.1	1499	−5.89	+0.19	−6.08	488(39th)
2005	1-9	915	14.0	30.3	−16.3	1541	−8.3	+7.1	−15.4	1114	−7.08	+0.14	−7.22	421(20th)
2004	3-7	1198	18.0	27.6	−9.6	1435	−6.4	+5.1	−11.5	1212	−5.45	+0.21	−5.66	463(31st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.