← Back
CLASS 6A · District 23-6A

Waller Bulldogs

Enrollment: 3,191 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4
Rank
#41
was #41
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1938
#41 of 249
OVR Grade
83.2
#41 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
Aldine Davis (0-0) 1416
90% (+21)
2
Spring (0-0) 955
> 98% (+39)
3
@Conroe (0-0) 1483
87% (+18)
5
#39Fulshear (0-0) 1944
49% (0)
6
@Cy Park (0-0) 764
> 98% (+47)
7
Cy Springs (0-0) 1592
81% (+14)
8
Richmond Foster (0-0) 1325
93% (+25)
9
@#31Cy Ranch (0-0) 2039
40% (-4)
10
#32Bridgeland (0-0) 2023
41% (-3)
11 95% (+28)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 23-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 31
Mustangs
84.7
2039
0-0 0-0 5.5-1.5 96% D1
2 32
Bears
84.5
2023
0-0 0-0 5.4-1.6 95.6% D1
3 39
Chargers
83.3
1944
0-0 0-0 5-2 91.4% D2
4 41
Bulldogs
83.2
1938
0-0 0-0 5-2 90.6% D2
5 96
Panthers
78
1592
0-0 0-0 3.2-3.8 22.5%
6 164
Falcons
74
1325
0-0 0-0 2-5 2.9%
7 176
Longhorns
72.6
1232
0-0 0-0 1.6-5.4 < 2%
8 230
Tigers
65.5
764
0-0 0-0 0.3-6.7 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Waller’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2025
7-4
Rating 599 (77th)
#2 · 2024
4-6
Rating 503 (45th)
#3 · 2023
2-8
Rating 450 (28th)
#4 · 2022
0-10
Rating 364 (9th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 7-4 1801 41.2 25.8 +15.4 1467 +12.2 −2.2 +14.4 1859 −0.45 +1.28 −1.73 599(77th)
2024 4-6 1206 31.1 28.0 +3.1 1421 +2.1 +0.5 +1.6 1540 −3.58 +0.20 −3.78 503(45th)
2023 2-8 1112 20.1 36.5 −16.4 1567 −6.0 +6.8 −12.8 1181 −4.79 +0.17 −4.96 450(28th)
2022 0-10 899 12.8 50.1 −37.3 1628 −13.0 +17.7 −30.7 733 −6.65 0.00 −6.65 364(9th)
2021 1-0 1086 62.0 0.0 +62.0 402 +3.4 −1.6 +4.9 1624 +0.00 +0.00 0.00
2020 0-2 1037 23.5 34.0 −10.5 1550 −3.9 +4.2 −8.1 1298 −1.87 0.00 −1.87
2019 0-1 1174 3.0 14.0 −11.0 1085 −34.2 −4.7 −29.5 762 −0.85 0.00 −0.85
2018 0-1 1204 10.0 20.0 −10.0 1439 −8.6 −0.1 −8.4 1289 −0.87 0.00 −0.87
2017 1-0 1250 40.0 0.0 +40.0 544 −8.8 −3.5 −5.3 1368 +0.02 +0.02 0.00
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.