← Back

CLASS 6A · District 21-6A

Fort Bend Hightower Hurricanes

Enrollment: 2,232 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 8

Rank

#65

was #65

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1756

#65 of 249

OVR Grade

80.5

#65 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	#31Cy Ranch (0-0) 2039	23% (-11)	—	—	—	—
2	@Cy Springs (0-0) 1592	66% (+7)	—	—	—	—
3	Richmond Foster (0-0) 1325	86% (+17)	—	—	—	—
4	Fort Bend Elkins (0-0) 1292	87% (+19)	—	—	—	—
5	@Strake Jesuit (0-0) 1623	64% (+5)	—	—	—	—
6	@Fort Bend Bush (0-0) 1433	79% (+13)	—	—	—	—
7	Fort Bend Clements (0-0) 718	> 98% (+41)	—	—	—	—
9	@Fort Bend Travis (0-0) 1526	72% (+9)	—	—	—	—
10	Fort Bend Austin (0-0) 901	97% (+34)	—	—	—	—
11	@#19Fort Bend Ridge Point (0-0) 2225	12% (-19)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 21-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		19	Fort Bend Ridge Point (4) Panthers	87.5 2225	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.7-0.3	> 98%	D2
2		65	Fort Bend Hightower (8) Hurricanes	80.5 1756	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.1-1.9	94%	D2
3		88	Strake Jesuit (2) Crusaders	78.5 1623	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.4-2.5	82.5%	D1
4		105	Fort Bend Travis (1) Tigers	77 1526	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-3	67.2%	D1
5		138	Fort Bend Bush (7) Broncos	75.6 1433	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.5-3.5	41%	—
6		168	Fort Bend Elkins (3) Knights	73.5 1292	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.7-4.3	14.9%	—
7		221	Fort Bend Austin (5) Bulldogs	67.6 901	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.1-5.9	< 2%	—
8		237	Fort Bend Clements (6) Rangers	64.8 718	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.5-6.5	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Fort Bend Hightower’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2008

13-1

Rating 752 (97th)

#2 · 2011

13-3

Rating 699 (94th)

#3 · 2023

12-2

Rating 693 (93rd)

#4 · 2009

11-1

Rating 672 (91st)

#5 · 2022

10-3

Rating 639 (86th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	7-4	1670	41.9	31.0	+10.9	1455	+8.9	+1.0	+7.9	1698	−0.66	+1.05	−1.71	566(67th)
2024	9-2	1910	40.6	15.2	+25.5	1400	+9.6	−10.2	+19.8	1995	+0.78	+1.75	−0.97	636(85th)
2023	12-2	2169	42.5	16.8	+25.7	1568	+16.3	−12.2	+28.5	2212	+2.78	+3.24	−0.45	693(93rd)
2022	10-3	1934	36.8	15.9	+20.9	1522	+9.9	−11.0	+20.9	2022	+1.04	+1.70	−0.67	639(86th)
2021	1-1	1623	19.0	19.0	0.0	1939	+2.8	−13.3	+16.1	1903	−0.11	+0.03	−0.14	—
2020	1-1	1625	28.0	31.5	−3.5	2026	+9.8	−4.4	+14.2	1855	+0.42	+0.54	−0.11	—
2019	1-1	1537	33.0	20.5	+12.5	1501	+4.0	−7.3	+11.3	1783	−0.41	+0.19	−0.60	—
2018	0-2	1386	20.5	27.0	−6.5	1679	−9.4	−10.0	+0.6	1514	−1.64	0.00	−1.64	—
2017	5-5	1529	23.3	19.2	+4.1	1446	−5.7	−7.2	+1.5	1537	−2.38	+0.39	−2.77	525(54th)
2016	5-5	1686	33.8	36.0	−2.2	1509	+5.5	+6.9	−1.4	1466	−1.49	+1.14	−2.63	531(55th)
2015	10-1	1844	31.2	13.9	+17.3	1364	+2.6	−9.0	+11.6	1790	+0.98	+1.57	−0.59	600(77th)
2014	7-4	1632	19.4	16.8	+2.5	1366	−9.6	−7.3	−2.3	1442	−2.21	+0.84	−3.05	527(54th)
2013	8-4	1816	22.7	21.7	+1.0	1625	−3.0	−10.0	+6.9	1673	−0.17	+1.38	−1.54	571(69th)
2012	5-5	1670	23.9	19.8	+4.1	1564	−1.0	−7.5	+6.5	1663	−2.81	+0.62	−3.43	557(64th)
2011	13-3	2377	36.3	22.4	+13.9	1688	+14.2	−6.1	+20.3	2007	+3.88	+4.81	−0.93	699(94th)
2010	9-3	2025	37.3	26.7	+10.7	1546	+11.1	−1.5	+12.6	1815	+0.93	+1.98	−1.05	623(83rd)
2009	11-1	2246	31.9	10.1	+21.8	1372	+6.3	−11.2	+17.5	1938	+1.46	+1.80	−0.34	672(91st)
2008	13-1	2356	36.6	11.7	+24.9	1631	+14.6	−16.6	+31.2	2279	+4.58	+4.61	−0.03	752(97th)
2007	10-4	1921	25.8	15.4	+10.4	1515	+3.6	−7.6	+11.2	1779	+0.05	+2.23	−2.18	622(83rd)
2006	9-4	1652	23.5	22.0	+1.5	1433	−0.3	−0.6	+0.4	1509	−1.00	+1.56	−2.56	550(62nd)
2005	5-5	1259	20.7	24.5	−3.8	1422	−3.9	+3.2	−7.2	1321	−3.25	+1.22	−4.47	480(37th)
2004	10-1	1876	30.5	13.0	+17.5	1354	+6.0	−5.8	+11.8	1794	+1.13	+1.35	−0.22	616(81st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.