| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fort Bend Travis (6-1) 1770 |
30% (-8) | L 21-43 | 1109 | −2.9 | +12.7 | — | −0.80 |
| 2 | @Katy Seven Lakes (0-6) 1008 |
50% (+0) | W 35-14 | 1514 | −3.8 | −4.4 | +0.08 | — |
| 3 | @Fort Bend Hightower (5-2) 1828 |
24% (-11) | L 0-54 | 641 | −15.7 | +18.7 | — | −0.70 |
| 5 | @Richmond George Ranch (3-3) 1355 |
55% (+2) | L 14-28 | 974 | −16.6 | +4.4 | — | −0.92 |
| 6 | 3% (-34) | L 0-38 | 1065 | −14.1 | +3.3 | — | −0.29 | |
| 7 | Cy Park (1-5) 782 |
84% (+16) | W 24-0 | 1298 | −17.1 | −9.0 | +0.01 | — |
| 8 | 5% (-29) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 9 | Cy Springs (2-4) 1559 |
20% (-13) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | #25Cy Ranch (5-1) 2165 |
< 2% (-37) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | < 2% (-39) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#171
was #177
Record
2-4
1-2 district
Elo
1233
#171 of 249
OVR Grade
72.6
#171 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
66.8
#209 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
71.4
#165 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1100
#186 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 23-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Richmond Foster’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2024
4-7
Rating 481 (37th)
#2 · 2025
3-8
Rating 457 (30th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.