← Back

CLASS 6A · District 21-6A

Fort Bend Austin Bulldogs

Enrollment: 2,639 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 5

Rank

#221

was #221

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

901

#221 of 249

OVR Grade

67.6

#221 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Houston Bellaire (0-0) 757	65% (+6)	—	—	—	—
2	Katy Taylor (0-0) 1011	39% (-4)	—	—	—	—
3	@Cy Woods (0-0) 1458	9% (-22)	—	—	—	—
4	@Fort Bend Bush (0-0) 1433	10% (-21)	—	—	—	—
5	Fort Bend Travis (0-0) 1526	7% (-25)	—	—	—	—
6	@#19Fort Bend Ridge Point (0-0) 2225	< 2% (-53)	—	—	—	—
7	Strake Jesuit (0-0) 1623	5% (-29)	—	—	—	—
9	@Fort Bend Clements (0-0) 718	68% (+7)	—	—	—	—
10	@Fort Bend Hightower (0-0) 1756	3% (-34)	—	—	—	—
11	Fort Bend Elkins (0-0) 1292	16% (-16)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 21-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		19	Fort Bend Ridge Point (4) Panthers	87.5 2225	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.7-0.3	> 98%	D2
2		65	Fort Bend Hightower (8) Hurricanes	80.5 1756	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.1-1.9	94%	D2
3		88	Strake Jesuit (2) Crusaders	78.5 1623	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.4-2.5	82.5%	D1
4		105	Fort Bend Travis (1) Tigers	77 1526	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-3	67.2%	D1
5		138	Fort Bend Bush (7) Broncos	75.6 1433	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.5-3.5	41%	—
6		168	Fort Bend Elkins (3) Knights	73.5 1292	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.7-4.3	14.9%	—
7		221	Fort Bend Austin (5) Bulldogs	67.6 901	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.1-5.9	< 2%	—
8		237	Fort Bend Clements (6) Rangers	64.8 718	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.5-6.5	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Fort Bend Austin’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2013

6-6

Rating 580 (72nd)

#2 · 2012

7-4

Rating 555 (64th)

#3 · 2005

6-4

Rating 516 (51st)

#4 · 2014

5-5

Rating 492 (41st)

#5 · 2006

3-7

Rating 479 (36th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	2-8	934	27.4	54.4	−27.0	1333	−6.9	+26.1	−33.0	675	−5.57	+0.01	−5.58	363(9th)
2024	4-6	1085	24.0	30.3	−6.3	1370	−8.0	+5.3	−13.4	1166	−3.27	+0.07	−3.35	442(25th)
2023	5-5	1130	17.3	26.7	−9.4	1289	−13.9	+3.7	−17.6	1060	−2.86	+0.20	−3.06	435(23rd)
2022	2-8	703	16.4	35.8	−19.4	1304	−13.4	+15.8	−29.2	771	−6.28	+0.05	−6.33	351(7th)
2021	0-10	675	11.3	38.4	−27.1	1354	−16.0	+16.9	−32.9	678	−7.98	0.00	−7.98	332(5th)
2020	2-6	1024	14.4	36.5	−22.1	1252	−15.5	+16.3	−31.8	705	−4.96	+0.06	−5.02	363(9th)
2019	3-7	1193	20.8	34.6	−13.8	1516	−5.0	+6.8	−11.8	1205	−4.28	+0.30	−4.58	450(28th)
2018	3-7	975	26.9	38.3	−11.4	1445	−3.3	+9.6	−12.9	1177	−4.94	+0.21	−5.15	428(21st)
2017	1-8	931	22.4	46.3	−23.9	1393	−7.2	+21.2	−28.4	790	−5.86	+0.01	−5.86	372(10th)
2016	3-7	1175	25.6	33.5	−7.9	1427	−5.2	+4.8	−10.0	1249	−4.97	+0.11	−5.08	455(29th)
2015	3-7	1149	12.6	20.7	−8.1	1325	−17.1	−1.8	−15.3	1117	−5.30	+0.06	−5.36	435(23rd)
2014	5-5	1453	19.4	20.3	−0.9	1331	−10.9	−4.3	−6.6	1334	−3.67	+0.37	−4.04	492(41st)
2013	6-6	1720	36.5	29.4	+7.1	1546	+7.4	−1.6	+9.0	1725	−2.79	+1.29	−4.08	580(72nd)
2012	7-4	1606	35.5	25.7	+9.7	1471	+7.9	+0.1	+7.8	1695	−1.76	+1.46	−3.21	555(64th)
2011	4-6	1273	17.0	19.6	−2.6	1369	−11.4	−2.7	−8.6	1284	−4.41	+0.39	−4.79	473(34th)
2010	1-9	863	14.2	31.7	−17.5	1406	−14.5	+6.7	−21.3	968	−7.16	+0.11	−7.26	395(14th)
2009	0-9	815	9.0	33.7	−24.7	1430	−15.4	+11.4	−26.8	831	−7.09	0.00	−7.09	371(10th)
2008	3-5	1181	18.6	27.4	−8.8	1450	−6.8	+5.6	−12.4	1190	−3.55	+0.29	−3.84	452(29th)
2007	4-6	1175	18.8	22.6	−3.8	1391	−6.1	+2.1	−8.2	1296	−4.57	+0.31	−4.88	468(33rd)
2006	3-7	1267	11.0	15.8	−4.8	1355	−15.1	−5.4	−9.7	1258	−5.49	+0.25	−5.73	479(36th)
2005	6-4	1413	20.7	16.9	+3.8	1350	−5.7	−3.8	−1.9	1451	−2.44	+0.59	−3.03	516(51st)
2004	3-7	1165	15.2	19.7	−4.5	1318	−11.0	+1.0	−12.1	1199	−5.63	+0.09	−5.72	457(30th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.