← Back
CLASS 6A · District 21-6A

Fort Bend Travis Tigers

Enrollment: 3,175 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 1
Rank
#71
was #70
Record
6-1
4-0 district
Elo
1770
#71 of 249
OVR Grade
80.7
#71 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
77.5
#97 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
77.2
#103 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1652
#100 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
@Richmond Foster (2-4) 1233
 70% (+8) W 43-21 1681 +12.0 +4.7 +0.10 —
2
@Fort Bend Marshall
 26% (-10) W 45-20 2155 +17.6 −8.6 +0.49 —
3
#46Cy Falls (5-1) 1967
 28% (-9) L 11-35 1321 −7.0 +0.2 — −0.34
4
Fort Bend Clements (3-4) 1095
 91% (+22) W 66-34 1999 +30.2 +10.2 +0.06 —
5
@Fort Bend Austin (1-6) 869
 97% (+34) W 12-7 1325 −19.4 −12.4 +0.02 —
6
Fort Bend Elkins (2-5) 1464
 75% (+11) W 17-16 1459 −11.1 −9.5 +0.17 —
7
@Fort Bend Bush (1-6) 1215
 90% (+21) W 35-14 1625 +2.3 −2.7 +0.07 —
9
Fort Bend Hightower (5-2) 1828
 44% (-2) — — — — — —
10
#10Fort Bend Ridge Point (7-0) 2445
 6% (-27) — — — — — —
11
@Strake Jesuit (2-5) 1493
 76% (+11) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 21-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 10
Panthers
90.9
2445
 7-0 4-0 41.9 12.9 6.9-0.1 > 98% D2
2 63
Hurricanes
81.6
1828
 5-2 4-0 36.3 13.4 5.6-1.4 > 98% D2
3 71
Tigers
80.7
1770
 6-1 4-0 32.7 21.0 5.3-1.7 > 98% D1
4 124
Crusaders
76.5
1493
 2-5 2-2 18.4 27.4 3.5-3.5 59.2% D1
5 127
Knights
76.1
1464
 2-5 1-3 22.0 31.0 3.2-3.8 38.9% —
6 174
Broncos
72.3
1215
 1-6 1-3 12.4 35.4 1.9-5.1 < 2% —
7 193
Rangers
70.5
1095
 3-4 0-4 26.7 33.9 1.3-5.7 < 2% —
8 217
Bulldogs
67.1
869
 1-6 0-4 19.3 30.3 0.4-6.6 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Fort Bend Travis’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2019
10-1
Rating 623 (83rd)
#2 · 2018
8-3
Rating 572 (69th)
#3 · 2012
8-5
Rating 567 (67th)
#4 · 2016
7-4
Rating 566 (67th)
#5 · 2021
6-5
Rating 566 (67th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 8-3 1714 37.7 30.5 +7.2 1452 +5.5 +0.3 +5.1 1629 +0.91 +1.40 −0.49 559(65th)
2024 5-6 1382 22.0 29.2 −7.2 1439 −6.7 +3.0 −9.7 1257 −2.83 +0.15 −2.98 480(37th)
2023 7-4 1566 22.9 22.0 +0.9 1454 −5.8 −5.1 −0.7 1482 −0.73 +0.63 −1.36 531(56th)
2022 4-6 1385 21.1 32.0 −10.9 1400 −6.4 +8.9 −15.3 1118 −3.44 +0.16 −3.61 458(30th)
2021 6-5 1614 28.0 19.8 +8.2 1594 +4.6 −7.3 +11.9 1798 −1.17 +0.93 −2.10 566(67th)
2020 4-4 1744 26.5 19.6 +6.9 1542 +0.1 −6.7 +6.8 1671 −1.90 +0.21 −2.10 556(64th)
2019 10-1 1962 43.0 24.1 +18.9 1464 +16.3 −2.9 +19.2 1979 +1.77 +2.12 −0.35 623(83rd)
2018 8-3 1761 44.0 35.9 +8.1 1483 +15.4 +6.4 +9.0 1724 +0.30 +1.29 −0.98 572(69th)
2017 5-5 1521 35.2 27.5 +7.7 1505 +7.7 −0.1 +7.8 1695 −1.90 +0.48 −2.38 546(61st)
2016 7-4 1664 40.8 32.4 +8.5 1535 +12.2 +2.4 +9.8 1744 −0.78 +1.43 −2.21 566(67th)
2015 6-5 1516 28.5 34.0 −5.5 1514 +2.8 +8.1 −5.3 1367 −1.74 +0.76 −2.50 501(45th)
2014 7-5 1606 30.4 35.0 −4.6 1553 +4.8 +5.9 −1.2 1471 −1.26 +1.14 −2.39 535(57th)
2013 3-6 1410 33.0 35.1 −2.1 1551 +4.8 +3.9 +1.0 1524 −3.80 +0.17 −3.97 515(50th)
2012 8-5 1725 31.7 31.2 +0.5 1597 +7.2 +2.7 +4.5 1611 −0.61 +2.68 −3.29 567(67th)
2011 4-6 1333 22.8 27.7 −4.9 1565 −2.4 +1.7 −4.1 1396 −3.22 +0.20 −3.42 493(42nd)
2010 6-5 1652 20.6 18.8 +1.8 1478 −6.3 −8.6 +2.3 1557 −1.54 +0.92 −2.46 545(60th)
2009 5-5 1322 25.7 25.2 +0.5 1339 −0.6 +5.3 −5.9 1353 −3.21 +0.29 −3.50 486(39th)
2008 6-3 1497 26.3 18.9 +7.4 1435 −0.4 −5.0 +4.7 1616 −1.18 +0.92 −2.10 538(58th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.