← Back
CLASS 6A · District 21-6A

Fort Bend Ridge Point Panthers

Enrollment: 2,644 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4
Rank
#19
was #19
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
2225
#19 of 249
OVR Grade
87.5
#19 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@#13Dickinson (0-0) 2378
35% (-6)
2
#28Alvin Shadow Creek (0-0) 2095
63% (+5)
3
@#32Bridgeland (0-0) 2023
70% (+8)
4
Strake Jesuit (0-0) 1623
93% (+24)
5 > 98% (+60)
6 > 98% (+53)
7
@Fort Bend Elkins (0-0) 1292
> 98% (+37)
9
Fort Bend Bush (0-0) 1433
96% (+32)
10
@Fort Bend Travis (0-0) 1526
95% (+28)
11 88% (+19)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 21-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 19
Panthers
87.5
2225
0-0 0-0 6.7-0.3 > 98% D2
2 65
Hurricanes
80.5
1756
0-0 0-0 5.1-1.9 94% D2
3 88
Crusaders
78.5
1623
0-0 0-0 4.4-2.5 82.5% D1
4 105
Tigers
77
1526
0-0 0-0 4-3 67.2% D1
5 138
Broncos
75.6
1433
0-0 0-0 3.5-3.5 41%
6 168
Knights
73.5
1292
0-0 0-0 2.7-4.3 14.9%
7 221
Bulldogs
67.6
901
0-0 0-0 1.1-5.9 < 2%
8 237
Rangers
64.8
718
0-0 0-0 0.5-6.5 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Fort Bend Ridge Point’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2025
11-1
Rating 724 (96th)
#2 · 2021
11-2
Rating 702 (94th)
#3 · 2024
10-2
Rating 697 (94th)
#4 · 2023
9-3
Rating 685 (92nd)
#5 · 2022
10-3
Rating 675 (91st)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 11-1 2256 48.7 12.0 +36.7 1472 +16.5 −18.1 +34.6 2365 +2.74 +2.85 −0.11 724(96th)
2024 10-2 2295 50.5 20.1 +30.4 1563 +21.7 −8.6 +30.3 2258 +2.31 +2.63 −0.32 697(94th)
2023 9-3 2110 48.2 20.2 +28.0 1579 +22.6 −8.2 +30.8 2270 +1.24 +2.03 −0.80 685(92nd)
2022 10-3 2128 37.5 15.8 +21.8 1641 +14.1 −12.8 +26.9 2172 +1.98 +2.39 −0.41 675(91st)
2021 11-2 2293 40.1 15.9 +24.2 1638 +17.7 −12.8 +30.5 2263 +2.93 +3.36 −0.43 702(94th)
2020 8-3 2244 34.9 26.9 +8.0 1807 +14.4 −7.2 +21.6 2041 +2.25 +2.80 −0.56 673(91st)
2019 8-3 2070 36.5 19.3 +17.3 1612 +12.0 −10.8 +22.9 2072 +0.86 +1.32 −0.46 645(87th)
2018 10-2 2131 27.9 19.0 +8.9 1576 +1.3 −11.6 +12.9 1821 +2.39 +2.56 −0.17 617(82nd)
2017 9-2 2146 38.3 15.4 +22.9 1508 +10.0 −11.6 +21.7 2041 +1.94 +2.33 −0.39 669(90th)
2016 10-1 2029 39.5 11.4 +28.1 1480 +9.3 −17.2 +26.5 2163 +1.95 +2.12 −0.17 673(91st)
2015 0-2 1596 28.0 33.5 −5.5 1951 +8.5 −3.5 +12.0 1800 −1.35 0.00 −1.35
2014 2-0 1747 28.5 13.0 +15.5 1669 +7.2 −15.7 +22.9 2073 +0.64 +0.64 0.00
2013 2-1 1503 33.0 20.7 +12.3 1373 +3.7 −8.2 +11.9 1798 −0.34 +0.42 −0.76
2012 1-2 1229 26.7 34.3 −7.7 1454 −0.3 +8.7 −9.0 1275 −1.67 +0.05 −1.71
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.