| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35% (-6) | W 29-26 | 2442 | +17.9 | −19.7 | +0.90 | — | |
| 2 | #23Alvin Shadow Creek (5-1) 2203 |
51% (+0) | W 28-7 | 2986 | +21.2 | −38.3 | +0.86 | — |
| 3 | 80% (+13) | W 56-35 | 2799 | +42.3 | −9.7 | +0.72 | — | |
| 4 | Strake Jesuit (2-5) 1493 |
> 98% (+39) | W 38-6 | 2279 | +13.6 | −17.5 | +0.17 | — |
| 5 | @Fort Bend Clements (3-4) 1095 |
> 98% (+51) | W 40-3 | 2124 | +4.2 | −20.8 | +0.05 | — |
| 6 | Fort Bend Austin (1-6) 869 |
> 98% (+62) | W 41-6 | 2075 | +9.6 | −13.4 | +0.02 | — |
| 7 | @Fort Bend Elkins (2-5) 1464 |
> 98% (+39) | W 61-7 | 2784 | +32.9 | −18.5 | +0.17 | — |
| 9 | Fort Bend Bush (1-6) 1215 |
> 98% (+49) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | @Fort Bend Travis (6-1) 1770 |
94% (+27) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | Fort Bend Hightower (5-2) 1828 |
93% (+25) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#10
was #8
Record
7-0
4-0 district
Elo
2445
#10 of 249
OVR Grade
90.9
#10 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
89.2
#17 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
91.8
#14 of 249 in 6A
Perf
2499
#11 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 21-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Fort Bend Ridge Point’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2025
11-1
Rating 724 (96th)
#2 · 2021
11-2
Rating 702 (94th)
#3 · 2024
10-2
Rating 697 (94th)
#4 · 2023
9-3
Rating 685 (92nd)
#5 · 2022
10-3
Rating 675 (91st)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.