← Back

CLASS 6A · District 22-6A

Katy Seven Lakes Spartans

Enrollment: 3,719 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 1

Rank

#170

was #170

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1275

#170 of 249

OVR Grade

73.2

#170 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@#47Houston Memorial (0-0) 1907	7% (-25)	—	—	—	—
2	Richmond Foster (0-0) 1325	45% (-2)	—	—	—	—
4	@Katy Morton Ranch (0-0) 1182	60% (+4)	—	—	—	—
5	Katy Paetow (0-0) 1598	21% (-13)	—	—	—	—
6	@#10Katy (0-0) 2427	< 2% (-46)	—	—	—	—
7	Katy Taylor (0-0) 1011	75% (+11)	—	—	—	—
8	@Katy Mayde Creek (0-0) 1364	41% (-4)	—	—	—	—
9	Katy Tompkins (0-0) 1710	14% (-17)	—	—	—	—
10	@Katy Jordan (0-0) 1820	9% (-22)	—	—	—	—
11	Katy Cinco Ranch (0-0) 1726	13% (-18)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 22-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		10	Katy (4) Tigers	90.6 2427	0-0	0-0	—	—	7.8-0.2	> 98%	D2
2		59	Katy Jordan (3) Warriors	81.4 1820	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.7-2.3	90.1%	D1
3		69	Katy Cinco Ranch (2) Cougars	80 1726	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.1-2.9	77.9%	D1
4		72	Katy Tompkins (6) Falcons	79.8 1710	0-0	0-0	—	—	5-3	73.8%	D2
5		93	Katy Paetow (7) Panthers	78.1 1598	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.4-3.6	44.9%	—
6		153	Katy Mayde Creek (9) Rams	74.5 1364	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.9-5.2	8.2%	—
7		170	Katy Seven Lakes (1) Spartans	73.2 1275	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.3-5.7	3.6%	—
8		181	Katy Morton Ranch (8) Mavericks	71.8 1182	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.8-6.2	< 2%	—
9		206	Katy Taylor (5) Mustangs	69.2 1011	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-7	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Katy Seven Lakes’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2014

8-3

Rating 634 (85th)

#2 · 2013

6-4

Rating 574 (70th)

#3 · 2021

7-4

Rating 556 (64th)

#4 · 2018

6-5

Rating 546 (61st)

#5 · 2011

6-4

Rating 544 (60th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	3-7	1288	12.3	28.2	−15.9	1554	−15.6	−2.5	−13.1	1172	−4.60	+0.27	−4.88	460(31st)
2024	4-6	1174	13.4	27.3	−13.9	1526	−12.0	+0.8	−12.8	1180	−3.20	+0.36	−3.56	451(28th)
2023	2-8	936	16.8	37.7	−20.9	1446	−10.5	+11.7	−22.2	945	−5.59	+0.32	−5.91	403(15th)
2022	1-9	1195	20.0	38.7	−18.7	1714	−5.2	+4.3	−9.6	1261	−5.63	+0.03	−5.67	460(30th)
2021	7-4	1743	21.5	24.5	−3.0	1690	−2.2	−7.8	+5.7	1641	+0.34	+1.34	−1.01	556(64th)
2020	3-6	1536	19.9	37.7	−17.8	1852	+0.2	+3.6	−3.4	1416	−1.56	+0.53	−2.10	516(51st)
2019	4-6	1441	23.5	30.0	−6.5	1638	−0.9	+0.2	−1.2	1471	−3.41	+0.23	−3.65	508(47th)
2018	6-5	1612	24.8	22.6	+2.2	1527	−1.1	−6.5	+5.4	1634	−1.87	+1.03	−2.90	546(61st)
2017	3-6	1351	20.1	28.9	−8.8	1611	−3.8	−0.1	−3.7	1407	−2.71	+0.14	−2.86	492(41st)
2016	3-7	1277	16.7	33.9	−17.2	1597	−7.8	+4.9	−12.7	1183	−3.85	+0.23	−4.09	455(29th)
2015	4-6	1553	28.8	27.7	+1.1	1438	+1.1	+2.7	−1.7	1458	−3.42	+0.33	−3.75	517(51st)
2014	8-3	1842	40.2	16.3	+23.9	1510	+13.4	−10.0	+23.4	2084	+0.40	+0.98	−0.58	634(85th)
2013	6-4	1584	24.8	14.6	+10.2	1492	−1.3	−12.2	+10.9	1772	−0.83	+0.81	−1.64	574(70th)
2012	5-6	1542	30.1	31.8	−1.7	1673	+4.4	−0.2	+4.6	1615	−2.22	+0.69	−2.91	539(59th)
2011	6-4	1542	25.1	19.3	+5.8	1499	0.0	−5.5	+5.5	1638	−1.34	+0.60	−1.94	544(60th)
2010	4-6	1311	30.6	33.9	−3.3	1534	+2.7	+4.6	−1.8	1454	−3.15	+0.42	−3.57	500(44th)
2009	4-7	1216	23.9	28.9	−5.0	1422	−3.3	+5.3	−8.6	1285	−4.11	+0.23	−4.34	468(32nd)
2008	3-6	1312	26.7	29.8	−3.1	1611	+4.3	+2.3	+2.0	1551	−3.60	+0.31	−3.92	512(49th)
2007	0-3	1102	16.0	21.7	−5.7	1376	−12.4	−1.5	−10.9	1227	−2.36	0.00	−2.36	—
2006	0-3	1131	4.3	51.0	−46.7	1558	−18.9	+24.4	−43.3	417	−2.59	0.00	−2.59	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.