← Back
CLASS 6A · District 4-6A

Keller Central Chargers

Enrollment: 2,397 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 8
Rank
#78
was #67
Record
4-2
1-2 district
Elo
1731
#78 of 249
OVR Grade
80.1
#78 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
77.8
#94 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
80.1
#74 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1748
#86 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
Plano West (2-4) 1342
 52% (+1) W 26-17 1646 +0.8 −5.0 +0.15 —
2
@Mesquite Horn (0-6) 1116
 64% (+6) W 45-18 1600 −9.2 −13.2 +0.13 —
3
@Carrollton Creekview
 94% (+27) W 55-14 1949 +15.5 −2.5 +0.02 —
4
#14Southlake Carroll (4-2) 2362
 5% (-29) L 17-35 1835 +3.2 −10.2 — −0.11
5
Byron Nelson (3-3) 1653
 25% (-11) W 47-34 1939 +12.7 −4.8 +0.53 —
7
@Northwest Eaton (2-4) 1535
 76% (+11) L 27-28 1521 +0.8 −0.1 — −0.82
8
@Keller Timber Creek (3-3) 1510
 72% (+9) — — — — — —
9
Fort Worth Boswell (3-3) 1350
 83% (+15) — — — — — —
10
@Keller (6-0) 1806
 42% (-3) — — — — — —
11
@Justin Northwest (0-6) 1148
 92% (+23) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 4-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 14
Dragons
89.6
2362
 4-2 3-0 34.5 26.5 6.8-0.2 > 98% D2
2 66
Indians
81.2
1806
 6-0 3-0 51.5 34.3 5.4-1.6 > 98% D1
3 78
Chargers
80.1
1731
 4-2 1-2 36.2 24.3 3.9-3.1 79.4% D2
4 93
Bobcats
78.9
1653
 3-3 1-2 33.8 43.5 3.4-3.6 53.8% D1
5 114
Eagles
77.1
1535
 2-4 1-2 22.3 31.5 3.3-3.7 34.5% —
6 122
Falcons
76.8
1510
 3-3 2-1 24.0 37.3 3.1-3.9 29.7% —
7 154
Pioneers
74.3
1350
 3-3 1-2 37.7 29.8 1.7-5.3 3.2% —
8 184
Texans
71.3
1148
 0-6 0-3 22.2 34.2 0.4-6.6 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Keller Central’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2011
8-3
Rating 611 (80th)
#2 · 2014
6-4
Rating 584 (73rd)
#3 · 2016
6-5
Rating 553 (63rd)
#4 · 2019
7-4
Rating 545 (60th)
#5 · 2025
5-5
Rating 535 (57th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 5-5 1566 29.9 30.6 −0.7 1561 +1.9 +0.4 +1.6 1539 −1.43 +0.62 −2.04 535(57th)
2024 1-9 909 17.9 37.2 −19.3 1650 −7.9 +5.9 −13.8 1154 −4.87 +0.02 −4.89 424(21st)
2023 0-10 780 10.7 41.7 −31.0 1553 −17.3 +10.5 −27.7 807 −6.74 0.00 −6.74 370(10th)
2022 1-9 1030 17.3 39.7 −22.4 1612 −11.0 +7.5 −18.5 1039 −5.89 +0.05 −5.95 416(18th)
2021 2-8 1166 18.2 33.1 −14.9 1692 −7.3 −0.9 −6.4 1340 −4.32 +0.27 −4.60 465(32nd)
2020 3-5 1401 13.6 29.2 −15.6 1670 −11.5 −4.0 −7.5 1313 −2.31 +0.48 −2.79 478(36th)
2019 7-4 1632 17.7 21.5 −3.8 1725 −5.1 −9.7 +4.7 1617 +0.21 +1.55 −1.33 545(60th)
2018 2-8 1309 16.4 32.5 −16.1 1712 −6.3 +1.1 −7.4 1315 −4.45 +0.25 −4.70 476(35th)
2017 6-5 1457 17.8 18.5 −0.7 1511 −8.9 −8.5 −0.4 1491 −2.15 +0.86 −3.01 514(49th)
2016 6-5 1700 29.7 25.3 +4.5 1498 +0.8 −4.2 +5.0 1625 −2.05 +0.80 −2.85 553(63rd)
2015 4-6 1543 22.5 30.7 −8.2 1654 −4.0 −1.6 −2.5 1439 −2.52 +1.12 −3.64 513(49th)
2014 6-4 1748 31.4 32.8 −1.4 1809 +6.3 −4.0 +10.3 1758 +0.31 +1.85 −1.53 584(73rd)
2013 5-6 1490 18.0 22.4 −4.4 1635 −7.4 −8.6 +1.1 1529 −2.31 +1.06 −3.38 522(53rd)
2012 6-5 1498 14.2 25.7 −11.5 1556 −11.2 −3.3 −7.9 1302 −2.00 +0.50 −2.50 493(42nd)
2011 8-3 1897 27.0 16.7 +10.3 1586 +2.7 −11.5 +14.2 1855 +1.13 +2.17 −1.04 611(80th)
2010 5-5 1343 25.1 28.2 −3.1 1527 −2.2 −0.4 −1.8 1454 −2.42 +0.40 −2.82 503(45th)
2009 3-7 1168 21.1 31.4 −10.3 1487 −7.6 +3.7 −11.2 1220 −4.69 +0.14 −4.83 454(29th)
2008 3-7 1263 22.0 27.0 −5.0 1549 −4.1 −0.3 −3.8 1404 −3.90 +0.14 −4.04 488(40th)
2007 1-9 1085 24.5 46.2 −21.7 1633 +1.8 +18.4 −16.6 1085 −5.85 +0.04 −5.88 432(22nd)
2006 4-6 1299 22.1 33.5 −11.4 1677 −1.3 +3.0 −4.3 1392 −3.34 +0.38 −3.72 492(41st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.