← Back

CLASS 6A · District 4-6A

Keller Central Chargers

Enrollment: 2,397 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 8

Rank

#130

was #130

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1456

#130 of 249

OVR Grade

75.9

#130 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Plano West (0-0) 1440	52% (+1)	—	—	—	—
2	@Mesquite Horn (0-0) 1599	35% (-6)	—	—	—	—
3	@Carrollton Creekview	87% (+18)	—	—	—	—
4	#9Southlake Carroll (0-0) 2444	< 2% (-40)	—	—	—	—
5	#30Byron Nelson (0-0) 2077	7% (-25)	—	—	—	—
7	@Northwest Eaton (0-0) 1456	50% (+0)	—	—	—	—
8	@Keller Timber Creek (0-0) 1477	48% (-1)	—	—	—	—
9	Fort Worth Boswell (0-0) 1376	58% (+3)	—	—	—	—
10	@Keller (0-0) 1583	37% (-5)	—	—	—	—
11	@Justin Northwest (0-0) 1333	63% (+5)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 4-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		9	Southlake Carroll (6) Dragons	90.9 2444	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.7-0.3	> 98%	D2
2		30	Byron Nelson (2) Bobcats	85.3 2077	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.8-1.2	> 98%	D1
3		98	Keller (3) Indians	77.9 1583	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.5-3.5	66.1%	D1
4		123	Keller Timber Creek (4) Falcons	76.3 1477	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.8-4.2	39%	D2
5		130	Keller Central (8) Chargers	75.9 1456	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.6-4.4	32.7%	—
6		130	Northwest Eaton (1) Eagles	75.9 1456	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.6-4.4	31.7%	—
7		150	Fort Worth Boswell (7) Pioneers	74.7 1376	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.1-4.9	17.9%	—
8		158	Justin Northwest (5) Texans	74.1 1333	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.9-5.1	12.8%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Keller Central’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2011

8-3

Rating 611 (80th)

#2 · 2014

6-4

Rating 584 (73rd)

#3 · 2016

6-5

Rating 553 (63rd)

#4 · 2019

7-4

Rating 545 (60th)

#5 · 2025

5-5

Rating 535 (57th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	5-5	1566	29.9	30.6	−0.7	1561	+1.9	+0.4	+1.6	1539	−1.43	+0.62	−2.04	535(57th)
2024	1-9	909	17.9	37.2	−19.3	1650	−7.9	+5.9	−13.8	1154	−4.87	+0.02	−4.89	424(21st)
2023	0-10	780	10.7	41.7	−31.0	1553	−17.3	+10.5	−27.7	807	−6.74	0.00	−6.74	370(10th)
2022	1-9	1030	17.3	39.7	−22.4	1612	−11.0	+7.5	−18.5	1039	−5.89	+0.05	−5.95	416(18th)
2021	2-8	1166	18.2	33.1	−14.9	1692	−7.3	−0.9	−6.4	1340	−4.32	+0.27	−4.60	465(32nd)
2020	3-5	1401	13.6	29.2	−15.6	1670	−11.5	−4.0	−7.5	1313	−2.31	+0.48	−2.79	478(36th)
2019	7-4	1632	17.7	21.5	−3.8	1725	−5.1	−9.7	+4.7	1617	+0.21	+1.55	−1.33	545(60th)
2018	2-8	1309	16.4	32.5	−16.1	1712	−6.3	+1.1	−7.4	1315	−4.45	+0.25	−4.70	476(35th)
2017	6-5	1457	17.8	18.5	−0.7	1511	−8.9	−8.5	−0.4	1491	−2.15	+0.86	−3.01	514(49th)
2016	6-5	1700	29.7	25.3	+4.5	1498	+0.8	−4.2	+5.0	1625	−2.05	+0.80	−2.85	553(63rd)
2015	4-6	1543	22.5	30.7	−8.2	1654	−4.0	−1.6	−2.5	1439	−2.52	+1.12	−3.64	513(49th)
2014	6-4	1748	31.4	32.8	−1.4	1809	+6.3	−4.0	+10.3	1758	+0.31	+1.85	−1.53	584(73rd)
2013	5-6	1490	18.0	22.4	−4.4	1635	−7.4	−8.6	+1.1	1529	−2.31	+1.06	−3.38	522(53rd)
2012	6-5	1498	14.2	25.7	−11.5	1556	−11.2	−3.3	−7.9	1302	−2.00	+0.50	−2.50	493(42nd)
2011	8-3	1897	27.0	16.7	+10.3	1586	+2.7	−11.5	+14.2	1855	+1.13	+2.17	−1.04	611(80th)
2010	5-5	1343	25.1	28.2	−3.1	1527	−2.2	−0.4	−1.8	1454	−2.42	+0.40	−2.82	503(45th)
2009	3-7	1168	21.1	31.4	−10.3	1487	−7.6	+3.7	−11.2	1220	−4.69	+0.14	−4.83	454(29th)
2008	3-7	1263	22.0	27.0	−5.0	1549	−4.1	−0.3	−3.8	1404	−3.90	+0.14	−4.04	488(40th)
2007	1-9	1085	24.5	46.2	−21.7	1633	+1.8	+18.4	−16.6	1085	−5.85	+0.04	−5.88	432(22nd)
2006	4-6	1299	22.1	33.5	−11.4	1677	−1.3	+3.0	−4.3	1392	−3.34	+0.38	−3.72	492(41st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.