| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @Klein Collins (5-2) 1934 |
28% (-9) | L 21-42 | 1567 | +1.4 | −1.3 | — | −0.41 |
| 2 | #24Bridgeland (5-1) 2199 |
17% (-15) | L 7-35 | 1574 | −6.7 | −9.7 | — | −0.31 |
| 3 | #5Katy (7-0) 2587 |
< 2% (-38) | L 21-45 | 1972 | +13.6 | −5.2 | — | −0.05 |
| 4 | @Katy Taylor (5-2) 1540 |
77% (+11) | W 29-12 | 1866 | +3.4 | −11.2 | +0.10 | — |
| 5 | Katy Mayde Creek (1-5) 1114 |
89% (+20) | W 44-20 | 1770 | +7.1 | −3.7 | +0.05 | — |
| 7 | @Katy Jordan (4-2) 1745 |
26% (-10) | W 52-28 | 2483 | +30.2 | −9.1 | +0.59 | — |
| 8 | Katy Cinco Ranch (3-3) 1510 |
82% (+14) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | @Katy Seven Lakes (0-6) 1008 |
97% (+35) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | Katy Morton Ranch (2-4) 1216 |
94% (+26) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | @Katy Paetow (2-4) 1511 |
82% (+14) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#57
was #87
Record
3-3
3-1 district
Elo
1870
#57 of 249
OVR Grade
82.2
#57 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
80.7
#71 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
80.7
#67 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1872
#66 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 22-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Katy Tompkins’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2020
10-1
Rating 755 (98th)
#2 · 2021
11-2
Rating 735 (96th)
#3 · 2019
11-2
Rating 675 (91st)
#4 · 2022
8-3
Rating 665 (90th)
#5 · 2023
7-4
Rating 603 (78th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.