← Back
CLASS 6A · District 22-6A

Katy Jordan Warriors

Enrollment: 3,452 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 3
Rank
#59
was #59
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1820
#59 of 249
OVR Grade
81.4
#59 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@Cy Woods (0-0) 1458
82% (+15)
2
Houston Lamar (0-0) 1805
52% (+1)
3
Katy Paetow (0-0) 1598
72% (+9)
4
@#10Katy (0-0) 2427
7% (-24)
5
Katy Taylor (0-0) 1011
97% (+32)
6
@Katy Mayde Creek (0-0) 1364
87% (+18)
7
Katy Tompkins (0-0) 1710
61% (+4)
9
@Katy Cinco Ranch (0-0) 1726
60% (+4)
10
Katy Seven Lakes (0-0) 1275
91% (+22)
11
@Katy Morton Ranch (0-0) 1182
94% (+26)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 22-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 10
Tigers
90.6
2427
0-0 0-0 7.8-0.2 > 98% D2
2 59
Warriors
81.4
1820
0-0 0-0 5.7-2.3 90.1% D1
3 69
Cougars
80
1726
0-0 0-0 5.1-2.9 77.9% D1
4 72
Falcons
79.8
1710
0-0 0-0 5-3 73.8% D2
5 93
Panthers
78.1
1598
0-0 0-0 4.4-3.6 44.9%
6 153
Rams
74.5
1364
0-0 0-0 2.9-5.2 8.2%
7 170
Spartans
73.2
1275
0-0 0-0 2.3-5.7 3.6%
8 181
Mavericks
71.8
1182
0-0 0-0 1.8-6.2 < 2%
9 206
Mustangs
69.2
1011
0-0 0-0 1-7 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Katy Jordan’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2024
11-2
Rating 647 (87th)
#2 · 2025
9-4
Rating 600 (77th)
#3 · 2023
7-4
Rating 556 (64th)
#4 · 2022
5-5
Rating 543 (60th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 9-4 1841 33.3 21.4 +11.9 1527 +3.9 −8.9 +12.8 1821 −0.62 +1.27 −1.89 600(77th)
2024 11-2 2027 34.3 15.2 +19.1 1511 +7.3 −12.7 +20.0 2000 +1.74 +1.94 −0.19 647(87th)
2023 7-4 1550 35.1 25.9 +9.2 1462 +7.2 −0.1 +7.3 1683 −1.31 +0.52 −1.83 556(64th)
2022 5-5 1520 33.1 31.8 +1.3 1588 +6.5 +0.3 +6.2 1656 −1.57 +0.80 −2.38 543(60th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.